Abstract
Among the drivers of innovation and entrepreneurship in today’s knowledge-based economy, the role of universities received increased attention. Students were attributed a key role as they are both initiators and drivers in an entrepreneurial ecosystem. While the literature on scaling and managing entrepreneurship and innovation is growing rapidly, there are few studies on the experiences students encounter while becoming entrepreneurs. Hence, this study identifies experiences along academic journeys influencing students’ decision to engage in entrepreneurial activities. By the application of tools from domains of service design thinking (customer journey) and decision-making theory (theory of planned behavior), a qualitative research design was developed to conduct 18 in-depth interviews including three different stakeholder groups (entrepreneurs, participants, and organizers) within the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Graz University of Technology, Austria. The findings of this study include the identification and characterization of 113 experiences to develop a tool called ‘Touchpoint Contribution Chart’ with the aim to support designers of curricula, courses, entrepreneurial events and ultimately designers of any touchpoint to foster entrepreneurial commitment within an academic entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajzen, I.: The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and human decision processes, p. 188 (1991)
Bae, T.J., Qian, S., Miao, C., Fiet, J.O.: The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: a meta-analytic review. Entrep. Theory Pract. 38(2), 217–254 (2014)
Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., Sternberg, R.: What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Bus. Econ. 47(1), 53–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9700-6
Engel, S.J.: What I have learned about teaching entrepreneurship: perspectives of five master educators. Annals Entrepr. Educ. Pedagogy, 3 (2016)
European Commission. Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan. Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe, p. 6 f. 2013 evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, New York, pp. 313–330 (2000)
Evers, J.: From the Past into the Future. How Technological Developments Change Our Ways of Data Collection, Transcription and Analysis (2019), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1636/3161. (Accessed 21 February 2019)
Fallast, M., Vorbach, S.: The entrepreneurial student’s experience journey through engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 9(4), 122–124 (2019)
Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L.: Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1), 15–31 (2013)
Gird, A., Bagraim, J.: The theory of planned behavior as predictor of entrepreneurial intent amongst final-year university students. South African J. Psychol. 38, 711–724 (2008)
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Reprint Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick (2006)
Glaeser, J., Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, 4, Aufl Lehrbuch. VS Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden (2010)
Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., Fink, M.: Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 655 (2015)
Kent, C.A., Rushing, F.W.: Coverage of entrepreneurship in principles of economics textbooks: an update. J. Econ. Educ. 30(2), 184–188 (1990)
Kolvereid, L.: Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory Pract. 21, 47–57 (1996)
Kolvereid, L., Isaksen, E.: New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. J. Bus. Ventur. 21, 866–885 (2006)
Kuratko, D.F.: The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 29(5), 577. Bloomington (Indiana) (2005)
Lilischkis, S., Volkmann, C., Gruenhagen M., Bischoff, K., Halbfas B.: Supporting the Entrepreneurial Potential of Higher Education, Final Report (2015)
Mager, B.: Introduction to Service Design. Digital communications tool. Culminatum Innovation, n.pag., Cologne (2009)
Mars, M., et al.: ASHE higher education report. Entrepreneurship Educ. 34(5), 72 (2009)
Mayring, P., Fenzl, T.: Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (eds.) Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, pp. 543–556. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0_38
Miettinen, S., Koivisto, M. (Eds.) Designing Services with Innovative Methods (2009)
Publication Series University of Art and Design Helsinki, B 93. Kuopio Academy of Design. Taitemia Publication Series 33, Otava Keuruu
Plaschka, G.R., Welsch, H.P.: Emerging structures in entrepreneurship education: Curricular designs and strategies. Entrep. Theory Pract. 14(3), 55–71 (1990)
Risdon, C.: Unsucking the touchpoint (2018). https://articles.uie.com/un-sucking-the-touchpoint/. (Accessed 02 May 2018)
Rosenbaum, M.S., Otalora, M.L., Ramírez, G.C.: How to create a realistic customer journey map. Bus. Horiz. 60(1), 143–150 (2017)
Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions. Int. J. Res. Market. 137 (1995)
Whittle, S., Foster, M.: Customer profiling: getting into your customer’s shoes. Manag. Decis. 27(6) (1989)
Yang, J.: The Theory of planned behavior and prediction of entrepreneurial intention among Chinese undergraduates. Soc. Behav. Pers. 41(3), 367–376 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neubauer, J., Glinik, M., Fallast, M. (2023). Identification and Characterization of Entrepreneurship Related Touchpoints in Student Customer Journeys. In: Auer, M.E., Pachatz, W., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Learning in the Age of Digital and Green Transition. ICL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 633. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26876-2_100
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26876-2_100
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26875-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26876-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)