Abstract
The UN global sustainable development goals (SDGs) framework can guide software development strategies to achieve more sustainable solutions. From an educational perspective, this is of high importance, as software can reach millions of people worldwide, helping to spread the key messages of sustainable development. EdTech Companies can reach these goals not only by optimising their software from a resource demand perspective, allowing for equitable use and inclusion, partnering with socially responsible actors, using clean energy, and investing back in socially and environmentally impactful projects; but also, by nudging their users for more sustainable choices through designing their software solutions to trigger more sustainable behaviour.
EdTech companies, being important actors in digital transition in education, bear a responsibility to help educators embed sustainable development into teaching and learning through their digital educational solutions, thereby contributing to sustainability awareness raising among students (UNESCO, 2018). Many of the key messages of sustainable development are reported by EdTech companies in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. Where terms such as net-zero, low carbon emissions, and carbon-offsetting often appear and used as measures of impact [1]. In contrast these reports rarely focus on how companies support sustainable development awareness raising and learning through their practices and software development.
In this working paper we explore, how EdTech providers approach sustainability through their products and in their practices and what makes the latter impactful, focusing on a specific case of Ansys Granta EduPack. This has been achieved by developing a framework for assessment of EdTech sustainability practices and using it to analyse their CSR reports. To validate this framework, we have applied it to a case study of Ansys Granta EduPack teaching software, its tools and educational resources to support sustainability teaching/learning. The next step would be to approach its users among academics and students to provide their feedback on intended versus achieved Learning Outcomes for sustainable development teaching. We aim to explore gaps, identified in the framework, which EdTech companies can fill to act truly sustainably. As a result, we are aiming to suggest further areas of research, the most impactful areas for EdTech to support teaching sustainable development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shayan, N.F., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., Zahed, M.A.: Sustainable development goals as a framework for corporate social responsibility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031222
Bernhard, F.: United Nations Global Impact, Reporting on the SDGs - Enhance and mainstream corporate reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved June 27, 2022 (2022). https://www.unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action-platforms/sdg-reporting
UNESCO: Education for sustainable development goals: learning objectives. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives; 2017 (unesco.de) (2017). Accessed 11 Jul 2022
Kioupi, V., Voulvoulis, N.: Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(21) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216104
Sajeva, M., Sahota, P.S., Lemon, M.: Giving sustainability a chance: a participatory framework for choosing between alternative futures. J. Organ. Trans. Soc. Change 12(1), 57–89 (2015)
Porritt, J., Parkin, S.: Forum for the Future, 2007. The Five Capitals Model–a framework for sustainability. Action for a Sustainable World (2007). https://www.forumforthefuture.org/. Accessed 11 Jul 22
Ansys.com, Ansys Education Resources | Ansys Granta EduPack https://www.ansys.com/academic/educators/education-resources
Ansys Inc. 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report. [online] Canonsburg: Ansys Inc. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01670-X. Accessed 11 Jul 2022
Ashby, M.: Materials and Sustainable Development. ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01670-X
Vakhitova, T., Ashby, M.: A tool for introducing Social Life Cycle Assessment of products and feedback from its users. In: Proceedings EESD 2020 Conference (2020). https://www.eesd2020.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Vakhitova_et_al_EESD2020_11_Style.pdf
Vakhitova, T., Shercliff H., Ashby, M.: Taking Stock: Sustainability in Engineering Teaching; case of CES EduPack – software for academics, Proceedings EESD 2015 (2015). https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/52657/items/1.0064736
Ashby, et al.: White Paper “A tool for introducing Social Life Cycle Assessment of products and feedback from its users”. In: Paper: Social Life-Cycle Assessment and Social Impact Audit Tool | Ansys (2017)
United Nations: The Sustainable Development Goals Report (2018). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2569Partnership_Exchange_2018_Report.pdf. Accessed 17 Jun 2022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vakhitova, T.V., Oti, A., Kioupi, V., Giannopoulos, G. (2023). The Gaps and Strategies for Sustainable Digital Transition in Education. In: Auer, M.E., Pachatz, W., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Learning in the Age of Digital and Green Transition. ICL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 633. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26876-2_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26876-2_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26875-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26876-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)