Skip to main content

Automatic Short Answer Grading Using Universal Sentence Encoder

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning in the Age of Digital and Green Transition (ICL 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 633))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 730 Accesses

Abstract

Automatic Evaluation of Text Answers, popularly known as Automatic Short Answer Grading (ASAG) is an area of research and development currently. The widespread acceptance of online learning and increased number of enrolments in such courses has necessitated the creation of a method that can be applied across platforms for all types of supply based answers. The current paper proposes a simple technique using the Deep Learning Based Universal Sentence Encoder to generate vectors for each answer. These vectors can then be compared against vectors generated from model answers to get the final score for the student’s answer. Experimental results show that for a sizeable dataset, the approach works well and can be considered a reliable approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakraborty, M.: Here’s why DU teachers are not evaluating answer papers since May 24. Hindustan Times, June 15, 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gafoor, K.A., Umer Farooque, T.K.: Incongruence in scoring practices of answer scripts and their implications: need for urgent examination reforms in secondary pre-service teacher education. In: Proceedings of UGC sponsored national seminar on Fostering 21 st Century Skills: Challenges to Teacher quality, August 22–23, 2014, Kerala, pp. 2–5 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma, R.: (2017), “Model Rules: Board to train teachers how to evaluate answer-sheets”. The Indian Express, September 8, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows, S., Gurevych, I., Stein, B.: The eras and trends of automatic short answer grading. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 25(1), 60–117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0026-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, S.-H., Lin, P.-C., Lin, Z.C.: Measures of partial knowledge and unexpected responses in multiple-choice tests. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10(4), 95–109 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lau, P.N.K., Lau, S.H., Hong, K.S., Usop, H.: Guessing, partial knowledge, and misconceptions in multiple-choice tests. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 14(4), 99–110 (2011). http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.4.99

  7. Yee, F.P.: Using Short Open Ended Mathematics Questions to Promote Thinking and Understanding. National Institute of Education, Singapore (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roy, S.: New Techniques for Automatic Short Answer Grading [Doctoral thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore] (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suzen, N., Gorban, A.N., Mirkes, E.M.: Automatic short answer grading and feedback using text mining methods, ArXiv:abs/1807.10543 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lubis, F.F., et al.: Automated short answer grading using semantic similarity based on word embedding. Int. J. Technol. 12(3), 571–581 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghavidel, H.A., Zouaq, A., Desmarais, M.C.: Using BERT and XLNET for the Automatic Short Answer Grading Task. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2020) - Volume 1, pages 58–67 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hasanah, U., Permanasari, A.E., Kusumawardani, S.S., Pribadi, F.S.: A review of an information extraction technique approach for automatic short answer grading. In: 2016 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE), pp. 192–196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITISEE.2016.7803072

  13. Roy, S., Dandapat, S., Nagesh, A., Narahari, Y.: Wisdom of students: a consistent automatic short answer grading technique. In: Proceedings of the 13th Intl. Conference on Natural Language Processing, Varanasi, India. December 2016, pp. 178–187 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J., Dong, Y.: Measurement of text similarity: a survey. Information 11(9), 421 (2020). MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info11090421

  15. Cer,`D., et al.: Universal Sentence Encoder (2018). arXiv:1803.11175v2 [cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.11175

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udit Kumar Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chakraborty, C., Sethi, R., Chauhan, V., Sarma, B., Chakraborty, U.K. (2023). Automatic Short Answer Grading Using Universal Sentence Encoder. In: Auer, M.E., Pachatz, W., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Learning in the Age of Digital and Green Transition. ICL 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 633. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26876-2_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics