Abstract
Recent advancements in robotic technologies have boosted new robot applications to perform many tasks that used to be limited to humans. Given this trend towards the ubiquity of robotics in day-to-day life, demand for professionals with expertise in robot development and maintenance is highly expected to increase. It is essential that such talents be fostered in future generations at an early age in order to meet this demand. However, several challenges arise in trying to accomplish this mission. First of all, it might be difficult to hold children’s attention when teaching them a new or potentially challenging subject, especially when the subject is not attractive for them. In addition, lack of mathematical understanding, which can make it challenging to comprehend key principles, is another problem with robotics teaching at young ages. In this paper, we propose a highly-accessible drone design and an accompanying education strategy, which, together, can alleviate the aforementioned problems. The major goals of the developed drone are to remain affordable as well as to enhance students’ attention and motivation while maintaining a high level of functionality and safety. In the proposed educational strategy, students will be divided into four different levels; each level will have its own procedure to enable educators to integrate robotics into existing curricula. At each level, moreover, students will learn increasingly more complex robotics subjects by interacting with the drone through a user-friendly visual coding interface.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bansal, H.O., Sharma, R., Shreeraman, P.: PID controller tuning techniques: a review. J. Control Eng. Technol. 2(4) (2012)
Benitti, F.B.V., Spolaôr, N.: How have robots supported stem teaching? Robotics in STEM Education, pp. 103–129 (2017)
Bennett, S.: Development of the PID controller. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 13(6), 58–62 (1993)
Bermúdez, A., Casado, R., Fernández, G., Guijarro, M., Olivas, P.: Drone challenge: a platform for promoting programming and robotics skills in k-12 education. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 16(1) (2019)
Brand, I., Roy, J., Ray, A., Oberlin, J., Oberlix, S.: Pidrone: an autonomous educational drone using raspberry pi and python. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2018)
Breuch, B., Fislake, M.: First steps in teaching robotics with drones. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds.) RiE 2019. AISC, vol. 1023, pp. 138–144. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_13
Campolettano, E.T., et al.: Ranges of injury risk associated with impact from unmanned aircraft systems. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(12), 2733–2741 (2017)
DeCoito, I., Myszkal, P.: Connecting science instruction and teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs in stem education. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 29(6), 485–503 (2018)
Ekwueme, C.O., Ekon, E.E., Ezenwa-Nebife, D.C.: The impact of hands-on-approach on student academic performance in basic science and mathematics. High. Educ. Stud. 5(6), 47–51 (2015)
Eric, E., Geuna, A., Guerzoni, M., Nuccio, M.: Mapping the evolution of the robotics industry: a cross country comparison (2018)
Jeong, H., et al.: Design of a safe, low cost, open-source, and open-hardware educational drone (2019)
Nikiforos, S., Kontomaris, C., Chorianopoulos, K.: MIT scratch: a powerful tool for improving teaching of programming. In: Conference on Informatics in Education, pp. 1–5 (2013)
Rivera, D.E., Morari, M., Skogestad, S.: Internal model control: PID controller design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 25(1), 252–265 (1986)
Tantawi, K.H., Sokolov, A., Tantawi, O.: Advances in industrial robotics: from industry 3.0 automation to industry 4.0 collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Technology Innovation Management and Engineering Science, pp. 1–4 (2019)
Tournaki, N., Podell, D.M.: The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teach. Teach. Educ. 21(3), 299–314 (2005)
de Wit, C.C., Siciliano, B., Bastin, G. (eds.): Theory of Robot Control. CCE, Springer, London (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1501-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wimer, B., Dannemiller, J., Mahmud, S., Kim, JH. (2023). Low-Cost Entry-Level Educational Drone with Associated K-12 Education Strategy. In: Zaynidinov, H., Singh, M., Tiwary, U.S., Singh, D. (eds) Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. IHCI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13741. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27199-1_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27199-1_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27198-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27199-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)