Skip to main content

Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for Automated PET/CT Segmentation and Survival Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation and Outcome Prediction (HECKTOR 2022)

Abstract

Background: Accurate prognostic stratification as well as segmentation of Head-and-Neck Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can be an important clinical reference when designing therapeutic strategies. We set to enable automated segmentation of tumors and prediction of recurrence-free survival (RFS) using advanced deep learning techniques and Hybrid Machine Learning Systems (HMLSs).

Method: In this work, 883 subjects were extracted from HECKTOR-Challenge: ~60% of the total subjects were considered for the training and validation procedure, and the remaining subjects for external testing were employed to validate our models. PET images were registered to CT. First, a weighted fusion technique was employed to combine PET and CT information. We also employed Cascade-Net to enable automated segmentation of HNSCC tumors. Moreover, we extracted deep learning features (DF) via a 3D auto-encoder algorithm from PET and the fused image. Subsequently, we employed an HMLS including a feature selection algorithm such as Mutual Information (MI) linked with a survival prediction algorithm such as Random Survival Forest (RSF) optimized by 5-fold cross-validation and grid search. The dataset with DFs was normalized by the z-score technique. Moreover, dice score and c-Index were reported to evaluate the segmentation and prediction models, respectively.

Result: For segmentation, the weighted fusion technique followed by the Cascade-Net segmentation algorithm resulted in a validation dice score of 72%. External testing of 71% confirmed our findings. DFs extracted from sole PET and MI followed by RSF enabled us to receive a validation c-index of 66% for RFS prediction. The external testing of 59% confirmed our finding.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that using the fusion technique followed by an appropriate automated segmentation technique provides good performance. Moreover, employing DFs extracted from sole PET and HMLS, including MI linked with RSF, enables us to perform the appropriate survival prediction. We also showed imaging information extracted from PET outperformed the usage of the fused images in the prediction of RFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fatan, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Askari, D., Sheikhi, H., Rezaeijo, S.M., Salmanpour, M.R.: Fusion-based head and neck tumor segmentation and survival prediction using robust deep learning techniques and advanced hybrid machine learning systems. In: Andrearczyk, V., Oreiller, V., Hatt, M., Depeursinge, A. (eds.) HECKTOR 2021. LNCS, vol. 13209, pp. 211–223. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98253-9_20

  2. Salmanpour, M.R., Hajianfar, G., Rezaeijo, S.M., Ghaemi, M., Rahmim, A.: Advanced automatic segmentation of tumors and survival prediction in head and neck cancer. In: Andrearczyk, V., Oreiller, V., Hatt, M., Depeursinge, A. (eds.) HECKTOR 2021. LNCS, vol. 13209, pp. 202–210. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98253-9_19

  3. Singh, Y., Bhatia, P.K., Sangwan, O.: A review of studies on machine learning techniques. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Secur. 1(1), 70–84 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salmanpour, M.R., Shamsaei, M., Rahmim, A.: Feature selection and machine learning methods for optimal identification and prediction of subtypes in Parkinson’s disease. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 206, 106131 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salmanpour, M.R., et al.: Optimized machine learning methods for prediction of cognitive outcome in Parkinson’s disease. Comput. Biol. Med. 111, 103347 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salmanpour, M.R., et al.: Machine learning methods for optimal prediction of motor outcome in Parkinson’s disease. Physica Med. 69, 233–240 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oreiller, V., et al.: Head and neck tumor segmentation in PET/CT: the HECKTOR challenge. Med. Image Anal. 77, 102336 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iddi, S., Li, D., Aisen, P.S., Rafii, M.S., Thompson, W.K., Donohue, M.C.: Predicting the course of Alzheimer’s progression. Brain Inform. 6(1), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-019-0099-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vallieres, M., et al.: Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancer. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Javanmardi, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., Hajianfar, G., Nabizadeh, A.H., Rezaeijo, S.M., Rahmim, A., Salmanpour, M.: Multi-modality fusion coupled with deep learning for improved outcome prediction in head and neck cancer. In: Book Multi-Modality Fusion Coupled with Deep Learning for Improved Outcome Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer, pp. 664–668. SPIE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Butowski, N.A.: Epidemiology and diagnosis of brain tumors. CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learn. Neurol. 21(2), 301–313 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumari, N., Saxena, S.: Review of brain tumor segmentation and classification. In: Book Review of Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daisne, J.-F., et al.: Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology 233(1), 93–100 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodrigues, R.S., et al.: Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J. Nucl. Med. 50(8), 1205–1213 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roh, J.-L., et al.: 2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography as guidance for primary treatment in patients with advanced-stage resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO) 33(6), 790–795 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eyassu, E., Young, M.: Nuclear medicine PET/CT head and neck cancer assessment, protocols, and interpretation. StatPearls [Internet] (2022). StatPearls Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taxak, N., Scholar, M.T., Singhal, S.: A Review of Image Fusion Methods

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Q., Shen, Y., Jin, J.: Performance evaluation of image fusion techniques. Image Fusion: Algorithms Appl. 19, 469–492 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salmanpour, M.R., Hajianfar, G., Lv, W., Lu, L., Rahmim, A.: Multitask outcome prediction using hybrid machine learning and PET-CT fusion radiomics. In: Book Multitask Outcome Prediction using Hybrid Machine Learning and PET-CT Fusion Radiomics (2021). Soc. Nuclear. Med.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zwanenburg, A., et al.: The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 295(2), 328–338 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salmanpour, M.R., Shamsaei, M., Saberi, A., Hajianfar, G., Soltanian-Zadeh, H., Rahmim, A.: Robust identification of Parkinson’s disease subtypes using radiomics and hybrid machine learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 129, 104142 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bank, D., Koenigstein, N., Giryes, R.: Autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05991 (2020)

  23. Rahmim, A., Zaidi, H.: PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges. Nucl. Med. Commun. 29(3), 193–207 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, G., Huang, Z., Shen, H., Hu, Z.: The head and neck tumor segmentation in PET/CT based on multi-channel attention network. In: Andrearczyk, V., Oreiller, V., Hatt, M., Depeursinge, A. (eds.) Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation and Outcome Prediction. HECKTOR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13209, pp. 68–74. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98253-9_5

  25. Xie, J., Peng, Y.: The head and neck tumor segmentation based on 3D U-Net. In: Andrearczyk, V., Oreiller, V., Hatt, M., Depeursinge, A. (eds.) HECKTOR 2021. LNCS, vol. 13209, pp. 92–98. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98253-9_8

  26. Salmanpour, M.R., et al.: Advanced survival prediction in head and neck cancer using hybrid machine learning systems and radiomics features. In: Book Advanced Survival Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer Using Hybrid Machine Learning Systems and Radiomics Features, pp. 314–321. SPIE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salmanpour, M.R., et al.: Prediction of TNM stage in head and neck cancer using hybrid machine learning systems and radiomics features. In: Book Prediction of TNM Stage in Head and Neck Cancer Using Hybrid Machine Learning Systems and Radiomics Features, pp. 648–653. SPIE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Salmanpour, M.R., et al.: Deep versus handcrafted tensor radiomics features: application to survival prediction in head and neck cancer. In: EANM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tang, M., Zhang, Z., Cobzas, D., Jagersand, M., Jaremko, J.L.: Segmentation-by-detection: a cascade network for volumetric medical image segmentation. In: Book Segmentation-By-Detection: A Cascade Network for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation, pp. 1356–1359. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Jay, N., Papillon, S., Olsen, C., El-, N., Bontempi, G., Haibe-Kains, B.: mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selection. Bioinformatics 29(18), 2365–2368 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U.B., Blackstone, E.H., Lauer, M.S.: Random survival forests. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2(3), 841–860 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the Technological Virtual Collaboration Corporation (TECVICO Corp.), Vancouver, BC, Canada, as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant RGPIN-2019–06467.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad R. Salmanpour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Code Availability

All codes are publicly shared at: https://github.com/Tecvico.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Salmanpour, M.R. et al. (2023). Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for Automated PET/CT Segmentation and Survival Prediction in Head and Neck Cancer. In: Andrearczyk, V., Oreiller, V., Hatt, M., Depeursinge, A. (eds) Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation and Outcome Prediction. HECKTOR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27420-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27420-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27419-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27420-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics