Skip to main content

An Ergonomics Assessment in India Post Manual Sorting Centre Using EDAS – A MCDM Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2022)

Abstract

Since workplace circumstances have improved over the past ten years, machining workloads have dramatically decreased in several industries. Due to the operators’ increased responsibilities, there are also increased cognitive demands on the individual. Any diversion or loss of focus results in subpar work or harm to people. The goal of the current study is to evaluate ergonomic concerns regarding the physical and cognitive demands placed on postal employee operators, such as scanners, sorters, managers, and stampers, who operate in post office environments. The study uses a survey and a pain scale to evaluate physical discomfort on a subjective basis. Utilizing questionnaires, cognitive demand as reported by the employee was assessed in a multitasking work environment that calls on a variety of skills. In the body, the lower leg, shoulder, neck, and back were named as key areas that cause discomfort. More people become aware of the higher cognitive demand they are experiencing as a result of the different skill needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rashid, T., Ali, A., Chu, Y.M.: Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection. PLoS One 16(2), 6738 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhanalakshmi, C.S., Madhu, P., Karthick, A., Manoj Mathew, R., Kumar, V.: A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS and EDAS as an auxiliary tool for pyrolysis material selection and its application. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 12(12), 5845–5860 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01009-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yalçin, N., Nuşin, U.N.C.U.: Applying EDAS as an applicable MCDM method for industrial robot selection. Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 37(3), 779–796 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Ghorabaee, M.K., Turskis, Z.: An extension of the EDAS method based on the use of interval grey numbers. Stud. Inform. Control 26(1), 5–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z.: Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica 26(3), 435–451 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghorabaee, M.K, Zavadskas, E.K., Amiri, M., Turskis, Z.: Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 11(3), 358–371 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ulutaş, A.: Sewing machine selection for a textile workshop by using EDAS method. J. Bus. Res. Turk 9(2), 169–183 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zindani, D., Maity, S.R., Bhowmik, S.: Fuzzy-EDAS (evaluation based on distance from average solution) for material selection problems. In: Narayanan, R.G., Joshi, S.N., Dixit, U.S. (eds.) Advances in Computational Methods in Manufacturing. LNMIE, pp. 755–771. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9072-3_63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bagal, D.K., Giri, A., Pattanaik, A.K., Jeet, S., Barua, A., Panda, S.N.: MCDM optimization of characteristics in resistance spot welding for dissimilar materials utilizing advanced hybrid Taguchi method-coupled CoCoSo, EDAS and WASPAS method. In: Bag, S., Paul, C.P., Baruah, M. (eds.) Next Generation Materials and Processing Technologies. SPM, vol. 9, pp. 475–490. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0182-8_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: A Comparative analysis of the rank reversal phenomenon in the EDAS and TOPSIS methods. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 52(3), 121–134 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kundakcı, N.: An integrated method using MACBETH and EDAS methods for evaluating steam boiler alternatives. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 26(1–2), 27–34 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A.E., Santibanez-Gonzalez, E.D., Otaghsara, S.K.: Evaluation of renewable energy resources using integrated Shannon Entropy—EDAS model. Sustainable Operations and Computers 1(1), 35–42 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sudha, A.S.: Application of EDAS method on water requirement in agriculture. Management 8(9), 20–22 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vadivel, S.M., Sequeira, A.H., Umoh, U., Chandana, V. (2023). An Ergonomics Assessment in India Post Manual Sorting Centre Using EDAS – A MCDM Approach. In: Abraham, A., Pllana, S., Casalino, G., Ma, K., Bajaj, A. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 646. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27440-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics