Skip to main content

Time Lag Analysis of Adding Scholarly References to English Wikipedia

How Rapidly Are They Added to and How Fresh Are They?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity (iConference 2023)

Abstract

Referencing scholarly documents as information sources on Wikipedia is important because they complement and improve the quality of Wikipedia content. However, little is known about them, such as how rapidly they are added and how fresh they are. To answer these questions, we conduct a time-series analysis of adding scholarly references to the English Wikipedia as of October 2021. Consequently, we detect no tendencies in Wikipedia articles created recently to refer to more fresh references because the time lag between publishing the scholarly articles and adding references of the corresponding paper to Wikipedia articles has remained generally constant over the years. In contrast, tendencies to decrease over time in the time lag between creating Wikipedia articles and adding the first scholarly references are observed. The percentage of cases where scholarly references were added simultaneously as Wikipedia articles are created is found to have increased over the years, particularly since 2007–2008. This trend can be seen as a response to the policy changes of the Wikipedia community at that time that was adopted by various editors, rather than depending on massive activities by a small number of editors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Day 1 report of Wikimania 2006 - Wikinews, the free news source. https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Day_1_report_of_Wikimania_2006. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  2. Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Seigenthaler_biography_incident. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  3. Wikipedia: Core content policies - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Core_content_policies. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  4. WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology. Wikipedia Signpost. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2008-01-28/WikiProject_report. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  5. USATODAY.com - A false Wikipedia ‘biography’ (2005). http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  6. Bilder, G.: Geoffrey Bilder: Strategic Initiatives Update #crossref15. https://www.slideshare.net/CrossRef/geoffrey-bilder-crossref15. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  7. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., Bordons, M.: Referencing patterns of individual researchers: do top scientists rely on more extensive information sources? J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(12), 2433–2450 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crossref: Crossref Metadata API JSON Format (2021). https://github.com/CrossRef/rest-api-doc/blob/master/api_format.md

  9. Halfaker, A., Taraborelli, D.: Research: Scholarly article citations in Wikipedia - Meta (2019). https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Scholarly_article_citations_in_Wikipedia

  10. Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., Riedl, J.: Don’t bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, WikiSym 2011, pp. 163–172 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F.: DOI links on Wikipedia: analyses of English, Japanese, and Chinese Wikipedias. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries (ICADL 2016), pp. 369-380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_40

  12. Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F.: A method to identify the edits adding bibliographic references to wikipedia. J. Japan Soc. Inf. Knowl. 30(3), 370–389 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2964/jsik_2020_033, (in Japanese, English abstract available)

  13. Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F.: Analyses of Wikipedia editors adding bibliographic references based on DOI links. J. Jpn. Soc. Inf. Knowl. 30(1), 21-41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2964/jsik_004, (in Japanese, English abstract available)

  14. Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F.: Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on English Wikipedia articles as of 1 March 2017 and as of 1 October 2021. Zenodo (2021). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5595573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F.: Time-series analyses of the editors and their edits for adding bibliographic references on Wikipedia. J. Japan Soc. Inf. Knowl. 31(1), 3–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2964/jsik_2020_037, (in Japanese, English abstract available)

  16. Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F.: Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia articles. Scientific Data 9, article no. 85, pp. 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01190-z

  17. Kousha, K., Thelwall, M.: Are Wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 68(3), 762–779 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y.: Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900–2004). J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59(2), 288–296 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20744

  19. Lin, J., Fenner, M.: An analysis of Wikipedia references across PLOS publications. figshare (2014). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1048991.v3

  20. Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC) Program Team: Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(26), 16899–16903 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242603899

  21. Nielsen, F.Å.: Scientific citations in Wikipedia. First Monday 12(8) (2007). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i8.1997

  22. Ota, T., Suzuki, Y., Nishikawa, T., et al.: Complete sequencing and characterization of 21,243 full-length human cDNAs. Nature Genetics 36(1), 40–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1285

  23. Pooladian, A., Borrego, Á.: Methodological issues in measuring citations in Wikipedia: a case study in Library and Information Science. Scientometrics 113(1), 455–464 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2474-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Raan, A.F.J.: On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics 47(2), 347–362 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005647328460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teplitskiy, M., Lu, G., Duede, E.: Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 68(9), 2116–2127 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thelwall, M.: Does Astronomy research become too dated for the public? Wikipedia citations to Astronomy and Astrophysics journal articles 1996–2014. El Profesional de la Información 25(6), 893–900 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.nov.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Varga, A.: The narrowing of literature use and the restricted mobility of papers in the sciences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119(17), e2117488119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117488119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wikimedia Foundation: Editor Trends Study/Results - Strategic Planning. https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_Trends_Study/Results. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  29. Wikimedia Foundation: Wikimedia Downloads. https://dumps.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  30. Wikipedia: User:ProteinBoxBot - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ProteinBoxBot. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  31. Wikipedia: User: Qbugbot - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Qbugbot. Accessed 14 Sept 2022

  32. Zhang, L., Glänzel, W.: A citation-based cross-disciplinary study on literature aging: part I—the synchronous approach. Scientometrics 111(3), 1573–1589 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2289-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP21K21303, JP22K18147, JP20K12543, and JP21K12592. The authors are deeply grateful to Professor Hideaki Takeda at the National Institute of Informatics (NII), Japan, for valuable suggestions and discussions. We would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.com/) for the English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiro Kikkawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F. (2023). Time Lag Analysis of Adding Scholarly References to English Wikipedia. In: Sserwanga, I., et al. Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity. iConference 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13972. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28031-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28032-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics