Abstract
The abrupt transition to online instruction in the COVID-19 pandemic presented an opportunity for instructors in information science to engage with new teaching and learning modalities. After their online semester (i.e., Spring 2020), some decided to utilize the insights they gained and offer blended-learning courses in the post-pandemic semester. In this mixed-methods study, we surveyed a sample of 388 students in a large undergraduate information science course that transitioned from online to blended learning: 212 students in the online offering and 176 students in the blended offering of the course. We compared students’ experiences in online and blended learning modalities and examined their perspectives on the blended learning component. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses yielded mixed results. Findings showed students preferred blended learning over online learning. They perceived it to be more engaging and active and reported that it allowed more peer interaction. Students had mostly positive perspectives of the blended learning components. However, some offered feedback on improving attendance requirements for the online component of the blended learning. Others reported online fatigue following online instruction during the pandemic. We discuss the findings and offer suggestions for effectively incorporating blended instruction in large information science courses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christensen, C., Raynor, M.E., McDonald, R.: Disruptive Innovation. Harvard Business Review, Brighton, MA (2013)
Mali, D., Hyoungjoo, L.: How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The Int. J. Manage. Educ. 19, 10052 (2021)
Yang, B., Huang, C.: Turn crisis into opportunity in response to COVID-19: experience from a Chinese university and future prospects. Stud. High. Educ. 46(1), 121–132 (2021)
Trout, B.S.: The coronavirus-induced transition to online learning perceptions and intentions of first-time online students. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 21(1), 1–1 (2020)
Hajjej, F., Ayouni, S., Shaiba, H., Alluhaidan, A.S.: Student perspective-based evaluation of online transition during the COVID-19 outbreak: a case study of PNU Students. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. (IJWLTT) 16(5), 21–38 (2021)
Tang, Y.M., et al.: Comparative analysis of Student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Comput. Educ. 168, 104211 (2021)
Benito, Á., et al.: Changes that should remain in higher education post COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis of the experiences at three universities. High. Learn. Res. Commun. 11, 51–75 (2021)
Ma, L., Lee, C.S.: Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37(5), 1397–1408 (2021)
Vo, H.M., Zhu, C., Diep, N.A.: The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: a meta-analysis. Stud. Educ. Eval. 53, 17–28 (2017)
Owston, R., York, D., Murtha, S.: Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet High. Educ. 18, 38–46 (2013)
Güzer, B., Caner, H.: The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 116, 4596–4603 (2014)
Finlay, M.J., Tinnion, D.J., Simpson, T.: A virtual versus blended learning approach to higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experiences of a sport and exercise science student cohort. J. Hospitality, Leisure, Sport Tourism Educ. 30, 100363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100363
Jonker, H., März, V., Voogt, J.: Collaboration in teacher design teams: Untangling the relationship between experiences of the collaboration process and perceptions of the redesigned curriculum. Stud. Educ. Eval. 61, 138–149 (2019)
López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L.: Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 818–826 (2011)
Singh, J., Steele, K., Singh, L.: Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post pandemic world. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 50(2), 140–171 (2021)
Bamoallem, B., Altarteer, S.: Remote emergency learning during COVID-19 and its impact on university students perception of blended learning in KSA. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(1), 157–179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10660-7
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., Bélisle, M.: An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 18(1), 1–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., Vanslambrouck, S.: Experts speaking: crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet Higher Educ. 48, 100772 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772
Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.A., Welch, K.R.: Blended learning in higher education: institutional adoption and implementation. Comput. Educ. 75, 185–195 (2014)
Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.: Affect detection: an interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 1(1), 18–37 (2010)
Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)
Nesher Shoshan, H., Wehrt, W.: Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: a mixed-method approach. Appl. Psychol. 71(3), 827–852 (2022)
Alon, L., Sung, S., Kizilcec, R.F.: How does active learning change undergraduate learning experiences? A case of a large technology design course. In: Innovate Learning Summit, pp. 201–208. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2021)
Jaggars, S.S., Xu, D.: How do online course design features influence student performance? Comput. Educ. 95, 270–284 (2016)
Lee, K., Fanguy, M., Bligh, B., Lu, X.S.: Adoption of online teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a systematic analysis of changes in university teaching activity. Educ. Rev. 74(3), 460–483 (2022)
Cartwright, N.M., Patil, P., Liddle, D.M., Newton, G., Monk, J.M.: Enhancement of professional behaviours and perceptions of critical skill job preparedness through the use of a group work contract in fourth-year nutritional science students. Int. J. Higher Educ. 10(2), 27–41 (2021)
McDonald, J.K., Michela, E.: The design critique and the moral goods of studio pedagogy. Des. Stud. 62, 1–35 (2019)
Guo, J., Pan, J., Guo, J., Gu, F., Kuusisto, J.: Measurement framework for assessing disruptive innovations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 139, 250–265 (2019)
Flavin, M.: A disruptive innovation perspective on students’ opinions of online assessment. Res. Learn. Technol. 29, 1–22 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alon, L., Sung, S., Kizilcec, R.F. (2023). “It’s Nice to Mix Up the Rhythm”: Undergraduates’ Experiences in a Large Blended Learning Course in Information Science in the Context of COVID-19. In: Sserwanga, I., et al. Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity. iConference 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13971. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28034-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28035-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)