Skip to main content

“It’s Nice to Mix Up the Rhythm”: Undergraduates’ Experiences in a Large Blended Learning Course in Information Science in the Context of COVID-19

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity (iConference 2023)

Abstract

The abrupt transition to online instruction in the COVID-19 pandemic presented an opportunity for instructors in information science to engage with new teaching and learning modalities. After their online semester (i.e., Spring 2020), some decided to utilize the insights they gained and offer blended-learning courses in the post-pandemic semester. In this mixed-methods study, we surveyed a sample of 388 students in a large undergraduate information science course that transitioned from online to blended learning: 212 students in the online offering and 176 students in the blended offering of the course. We compared students’ experiences in online and blended learning modalities and examined their perspectives on the blended learning component. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses yielded mixed results. Findings showed students preferred blended learning over online learning. They perceived it to be more engaging and active and reported that it allowed more peer interaction. Students had mostly positive perspectives of the blended learning components. However, some offered feedback on improving attendance requirements for the online component of the blended learning. Others reported online fatigue following online instruction during the pandemic. We discuss the findings and offer suggestions for effectively incorporating blended instruction in large information science courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christensen, C., Raynor, M.E., McDonald, R.: Disruptive Innovation. Harvard Business Review, Brighton, MA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mali, D., Hyoungjoo, L.: How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The Int. J. Manage. Educ. 19, 10052 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, B., Huang, C.: Turn crisis into opportunity in response to COVID-19: experience from a Chinese university and future prospects. Stud. High. Educ. 46(1), 121–132 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trout, B.S.: The coronavirus-induced transition to online learning perceptions and intentions of first-time online students. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 21(1), 1–1 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hajjej, F., Ayouni, S., Shaiba, H., Alluhaidan, A.S.: Student perspective-based evaluation of online transition during the COVID-19 outbreak: a case study of PNU Students. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. (IJWLTT) 16(5), 21–38 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang, Y.M., et al.: Comparative analysis of Student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Comput. Educ. 168, 104211 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benito, Á., et al.: Changes that should remain in higher education post COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis of the experiences at three universities. High. Learn. Res. Commun. 11, 51–75 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, L., Lee, C.S.: Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37(5), 1397–1408 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vo, H.M., Zhu, C., Diep, N.A.: The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: a meta-analysis. Stud. Educ. Eval. 53, 17–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Owston, R., York, D., Murtha, S.: Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet High. Educ. 18, 38–46 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Güzer, B., Caner, H.: The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 116, 4596–4603 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Finlay, M.J., Tinnion, D.J., Simpson, T.: A virtual versus blended learning approach to higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experiences of a sport and exercise science student cohort. J. Hospitality, Leisure, Sport Tourism Educ. 30, 100363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jonker, H., März, V., Voogt, J.: Collaboration in teacher design teams: Untangling the relationship between experiences of the collaboration process and perceptions of the redesigned curriculum. Stud. Educ. Eval. 61, 138–149 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L.: Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 818–826 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh, J., Steele, K., Singh, L.: Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post pandemic world. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 50(2), 140–171 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bamoallem, B., Altarteer, S.: Remote emergency learning during COVID-19 and its impact on university students perception of blended learning in KSA. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27(1), 157–179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10660-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., Bélisle, M.: An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 18(1), 1–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., Vanslambrouck, S.: Experts speaking: crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet Higher Educ. 48, 100772 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.A., Welch, K.R.: Blended learning in higher education: institutional adoption and implementation. Comput. Educ. 75, 185–195 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.: Affect detection: an interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 1(1), 18–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nesher Shoshan, H., Wehrt, W.: Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: a mixed-method approach. Appl. Psychol. 71(3), 827–852 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alon, L., Sung, S., Kizilcec, R.F.: How does active learning change undergraduate learning experiences? A case of a large technology design course. In: Innovate Learning Summit, pp. 201–208. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2021)‏

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jaggars, S.S., Xu, D.: How do online course design features influence student performance? Comput. Educ. 95, 270–284 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, K., Fanguy, M., Bligh, B., Lu, X.S.: Adoption of online teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a systematic analysis of changes in university teaching activity. Educ. Rev. 74(3), 460–483 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cartwright, N.M., Patil, P., Liddle, D.M., Newton, G., Monk, J.M.: Enhancement of professional behaviours and perceptions of critical skill job preparedness through the use of a group work contract in fourth-year nutritional science students. Int. J. Higher Educ. 10(2), 27–41 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McDonald, J.K., Michela, E.: The design critique and the moral goods of studio pedagogy. Des. Stud. 62, 1–35 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo, J., Pan, J., Guo, J., Gu, F., Kuusisto, J.: Measurement framework for assessing disruptive innovations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 139, 250–265 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Flavin, M.: A disruptive innovation perspective on students’ opinions of online assessment. Res. Learn. Technol. 29, 1–22 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilach Alon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alon, L., Sung, S., Kizilcec, R.F. (2023). “It’s Nice to Mix Up the Rhythm”: Undergraduates’ Experiences in a Large Blended Learning Course in Information Science in the Context of COVID-19. In: Sserwanga, I., et al. Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity. iConference 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13971. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28034-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28035-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics