Skip to main content

Improving the Generalizability of the Dense Passage Retriever Using Generated Datasets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2023)

Abstract

Dense retrieval methods have surpassed traditional sparse retrieval methods for open-domain retrieval. While these methods, such as the Dense Passage Retriever (DPR), work well on datasets or domains they have been trained on, there is a noticeable loss in accuracy when tested on out-of-distribution and out-of-domain datasets. We hypothesize that this may be, in large part, due to the mismatch in the information available to the context encoder and the query encoder during training. Most training datasets commonly used for training dense retrieval models contain an overwhelming majority of passages where there is only one query from a passage. We hypothesize that this imbalance encourages dense retrieval models to overfit to a single potential query from a given passage leading to worse performance on out-of-distribution and out-of-domain queries. To test this hypothesis, we focus on a prominent dense retrieval method, the dense passage retriever, build generated datasets that have multiple queries for most passages, and compare dense passage retriever models trained on these datasets against models trained on single query per passage datasets. Using the generated datasets, we show that training on passages with multiple queries leads to models that generalize better to out-of-distribution and out-of-domain test datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/facebookresearch/DPR.

  2. 2.

    https://www.kaggle.com/namanj27/ner-dataset.

References

  1. Asadi, N., Metzler, D., Elsayed, T., Lin, J.: Pseudo test collections for learning web search ranking functions. In: Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1073–1082. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azzopardi, L., de Rijke, M.: Automatic construction of known-item finding test beds. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval, pp. 603–604. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berendsen, R., Tsagkias, M., de Rijke, M., Meij, E.: Generating pseudo test collections for learning to rank scientific articles. In: Catarci, T., Forner, P., Hiemstra, D., Peñas, A., Santucci, G. (eds.) CLEF 2012. LNCS, vol. 7488, pp. 42–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33247-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berendsen, R., Tsagkias, M., Weerkamp, W., de Rijke, M.: Pseudo test collections for training and tuning microblog rankers. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 53–62. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bondarenko, A., et al.: Overview of touché 2022: argument retrieval. In: International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages, pp. 311–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6_21

  6. Boteva, V., Gholipour, D., Sokolov, A., Riezler, S.: A full-text learning to rank dataset for medical information retrieval. In: Ferro, N., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9626, pp. 716–722. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohan, A., Feldman, S., Beltagy, I., Downey, D., Weld, D.: SPECTER: Document-level representation learning using citation-informed transformers. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 2270–2282. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.207, https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.207

  8. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding (2018). arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805

  9. Diggelmann, T., Boyd-Graber, J., Bulian, J., Ciaramita, M., Leippold, M.: Climate-fever: a dataset for verification of real-world climate claims (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2012.00614, https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00614

  10. Hasibi, F., et al.:Dbpedia-entity v2: a test collection for entity search. In: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2017, pp. 1265–1268. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017) . https://doi.org/10.1145/3077136.3080751

  11. Hawking, D., Billerbeck, B., Thomas, P., Craswell, N.: Simulating Information Retrieval Test Collections. Morgan & Claypool (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoogeveen, D., Verspoor, K.M., Baldwin, T.: Cqadupstack: a benchmark data set for community question-answering research. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, pp. 1–8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karpukhin, V., et al.: Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 6769–6781. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khattab, O., Zaharia, M.: Colbert: efficient and effective passage search via contextualized late interaction over bert. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 39–48 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, J., Croft, W.B.: Retrieval experiments using pseudo-desktop collections. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1297–1306. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kwiatkowski, T., et al.: Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 7, 453–466 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Y., et al.: Roberta: a robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 (2019)

  18. Maia, M., et al.: Www’18 open challenge: financial opinion mining and question answering. In: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, WWW 2018, pp. 1941–1942 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3192301

  19. Raffel, C., et al.: Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683 (2019)

  20. Tafjord, O., Clark, P.: General-purpose question-answering with macaw. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.02593 (2021)

  21. Tague, J., Nelson, M., Wu, H.: Problems in the simulation of bibliographic retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Butterworth & Co., pp. 236–255 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thakur, N., Reimers, N., Rücklé, A., Srivastava, A., Gurevych, I.: BEIR: a heterogeneous benchmark for zero-shot evaluation of information retrieval models. In: Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=wCu6T5xFjeJ

  23. Thorne, J., Vlachos, A., Christodoulopoulos, C., Mittal, A.: FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and VERification. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (Long Papers), pp. 809—819. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1074, https://aclanthology.org/N18-1074

  24. Voorhees, E., et al.: Trec-covid: constructing a pandemic information retrieval test collection. SIGIR Forum 54(1) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3451964.3451965

  25. Voorhees, E.M.: The trec-8 question answering track report. In: Proceedings of TREC-8, pp. 77–82 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wachsmuth, H., Syed, S., Stein, B.: Retrieval of the best counterargument without prior topic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1: Long Papers, pp. 241–251. Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1023, https://aclanthology.org/P18-1023

  27. Wadden, D., et al.: Fact or fiction: verifying scientific claims. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 7534–7550. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609, https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.609

  28. Xiong, L., et al.: Approximate nearest neighbor negative contrastive learning for dense text retrieval (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00808

  29. Yang, Z., et al.: HotpotQA: a dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2369–2380. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1259, https://aclanthology.org/D18-1259

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Dreams Lab, a collaboration between Huawei, the University of Amsterdam, and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and by the Hybrid Intelligence Center, a 10-year program funded by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science through the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, https://hybrid-intelligence-centre.nl. All content represents the opinion of the authors, which is not necessarily shared or endorsed by their respective employers and/or sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thilina C. Rajapakse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rajapakse, T.C., de Rijke, M. (2023). Improving the Generalizability of the Dense Passage Retriever Using Generated Datasets. In: Kamps, J., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13981. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28238-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28238-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28238-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics