Skip to main content

Assessment of Human Activity Classification Algorithms for IoT Devices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IoT Technologies for HealthCare (HealthyIoT 2022)

Abstract

Human activity classification is assuming great relevance in many fields, including the well-being of the elderly. Many methodologies to improve the prediction of human activities, such as falls or unexpected behaviors, have been proposed over the years, exploiting different technologies, but the complexity of the algorithms requires the use of processors with high computational capabilities. In this paper different deep learning techniques are compared in order to evaluate the best compromise between recognition performance and computational effort with the aim to define a solution that can be executed by an IoT device, with a limited computational load. The comparison has been developed considering a dataset containing different types of activities related to human walking obtained from an automotive Radar. The procedure requires a pre-processing of the raw data and then the feature extraction from range-Doppler maps. To obtain reliable results different deep learning architectures and different optimizers are compared, showing that an accuracy of more than 97% is achieved with an appropriate selection of the network parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bianco, S., Cadene, R., Celona, L., Napoletano, P.: Benchmark analysis of representative deep neural network architectures. IEEE Access 6, 64270–64277 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chellapandi, B., Vijayalakshmi, M., Chopra, S.: Comparison of pre-trained models using transfer learning for detecting plant disease. In: 2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), pp. 383–387. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chollet, F.: Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1251–1258 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duchi, J., Hazan, E., Singer, Y.: Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12(7), 2121–2159 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gambi, E., Ciattaglia, G., De Santis, A., Senigagliesi, L.: Millimeter wave radar data of people walking. Data Brief 31, 105996 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105996, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340920308908

  6. Haimovich, A.M., Blum, R.S., Cimini, L.J.: Mimo radar with widely separated antennas. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25(1), 116–129 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Instruments, T.: Awr1642 single-chip 77- and 79-ghz fmcw radar sensor. http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/contentlanguage/all

  9. Instruments, T.: Dca1000evm data capture card. http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruij4a/spruij4a.pdf

  10. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  11. Krieger, G.: Mimo-sar: opportunities and pitfalls. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(5), 2628–2645 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 25, 1097–1105 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maeda-Gutierrez, V., et al.: Comparison of convolutional neural network architectures for classification of tomato plant diseases. Appl. Sci. 10(4), 1245 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan, E.: Object classification using range-doppler plots from a high density PMCW mimo mmwave radar (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ryu, S.J., Suh, J.S., Baek, S.H., Hong, S., Kim, J.H.: Feature-based hand gesture recognition using an FMCW radar and its temporal feature analysis. IEEE Sens. J. 18(18), 7593–7602 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2859815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Senigagliesi, L., Ciattaglia, G., De Santis, A., Gambi, E.: People walking classification using automotive radar. Electronics 9(4), 588 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shu, M.: Deep learning for image classification on very small datasets using transfer learning (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

  19. Sun, S., Petropulu, A.P., Poor, H.V.: Mimo radar for advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving: advantages and challenges. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 37(4), 98–117 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Szegedy, C., et al.: Going deeper with convolutions. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1–9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594

  21. Vandersmissen, B., et al.: Indoor person identification using a low-power FMCW radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 56(7), 3941–3952 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2816812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y., Ren, A., Zhou, M., Wang, W., Yang, X.: A novel detection and recognition method for continuous hand gesture using FMCW radar. IEEE Access 8, 167264–167275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, W., Dasgupta, S., Ramirez, E.E., Peterson, C., Norman, G.J.: Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors. J. Med. Internet Res. 14(5), e130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeiler, M.D.: Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.5701 (2012)

  25. Zhang, L., Wu, X., Luo, D.: Recognizing human activities from raw accelerometer data using deep neural networks. In: 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 865–870. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ennio Gambi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ciattaglia, G., Senigagliesi, L., Gambi, E. (2023). Assessment of Human Activity Classification Algorithms for IoT Devices. In: Spinsante, S., Iadarola, G., Paglialonga, A., Tramarin, F. (eds) IoT Technologies for HealthCare. HealthyIoT 2022. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28663-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28663-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28662-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28663-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics