Skip to main content

On the Realization of Cloud-RAN on Mobile Edge Computing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 655))

  • 673 Accesses

Abstract

The cellular network architecture is evolving to support a wide variety of applications with different traffic characteristics expected for 5G and beyond. Providing shared computing and network resources, Cloud based Radio Access Network (Cloud-RAN) in conjunction with Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) are considered key enablers to building 5G networks in a cost-efficient way. Understanding the limits and constraints of deploying the Cloud-RAN on MEC servers, allows the system to be engineered meeting latency and capacity requirements. By conducting a literature review, this paper discusses sharing computing and networking resources in MEC servers, which run software implementation of the Base Band Unit (vBBU) along with collocated applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhushan, N., et al.: Network densification: the dominant theme for wireless evolution into 5g. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52(2), 82–89 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ge, X., Song, T., Mao, G., Wang, C.-X., Han, T.: 5g ultra-dense cellular networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 23(1), 72–79 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Checko, A., et al.: Cloud ran for mobile networks-a technology overview. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(1), 405–426 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, Y.C., Patel, M., Sabella, D., Sprecher, N., Young, N.: Mobile edge computing-a key technology towards 5g. ETSI White Paper 11(11), 1–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. CPRI. Common public radio interface: ECPRI interface specification. CPRI Specification V7.0 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CPRI: Common public radio interface: ECPRi interface specification. eCPRI Specification V2.0 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. OBSAI: Open base station architecture initiative. BTS System Reference Document version, 2 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Checko, A., et al.: Cloud ran for mobile networks-a technology overview. IEEE Commun Surv. Tutor. 17(1), 405–426 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 3GPP TR 38.801. Study on new radio access technology: Radio access architecture and interfaces (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IEEE. IEEE STD 1914.1-2019: Standard for packet-based fronthaul transport network. IEEE Standards (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larsen, L.M.P., Checko, A., Christiansen, H.K.: A survey of the functional splits proposed for 5g mobile crosshaul networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(1), 146–172 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. RCRWireless. Exploring functional splits in 5g ran: Tradeoffs and use cases. Accessed Dec 2021

    Google Scholar 

  13. Assimakopulos, P., Birring, G.S., Kenan Al-Hares, M., Gomes, N.J. Ethernet-based fronthauling for cloud-radio access networks. In: 2017 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), pp. 1–4 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE. IEEE standard for packet-based fronthaul transport networks. IEEE Std. 1914.1-2019, pp. 1–94 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. IEEE. IEEE standard for radio over ethernet encapsulations and mappings. IEEE Std. 1914.3-2018, pp. 1–77 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gomes, N.J., Chanclou, P., Turnbull, P., Magee, A., Jungnickel. V.: Fronthaul evolution: from CPRI to ethernet. Opt. Fiber Technol. 26, 50–58 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finn, N.: Introduction to time-sensitive networking. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2(2), 22–28 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IEEE-P802.1CM. IEEE 802.1qbu-2016 - IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - bridges and bridged networks - amendment 26: Frame preemption. IEEE Std. 802.1Q-2014 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. IEEE-P802.1CM. IEEE 802.1qbv-2015 - IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - bridges and bridged networks - amendment 25: Enhancements for scheduled traffic. IEEE Std. 802.1Q-2014 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattacharjee, S., Schmidt, R., Katsalis, K., Chang, C.-Y., Bauschert, T., Nikaein, N.: Time-sensitive networking for 5g fronthaul networks. In: ICC 2020–2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–7 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacharjee, S., et al.: Network slicing for TSN-based transport networks. IEEE Access 9, 62788–62809 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomaszewski, L., Kukliński, S., Kołakowski, R.: A new approach to 5G and MEC integration. In: Maglogiannis, I., Iliadis, L., Pimenidis, E. (eds.) AIAI 2020. IAICT, vol. 585, pp. 15–24. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49190-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Reghenzani, F., Massari, G., Fornaciari, W.: The real-time linux kernel: A survey on preempt_rt. ACM Comput. Surv. 52(1), 36 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mosnier, A.: Embedded/real-time linux survey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Timmerman, M.: Real-time capabilities in the standard linux kernel: How to enable and use them? Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. 3(1), 131–135 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Yodaiken, V., et al.: The rtlinux manifesto. In: Proceedings of the 5th Linux Expo (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Molnar, I.: Linux low latency patch. Accessed Dec 2021

    Google Scholar 

  28. The Linux Foundation. Preempt_rt patch. https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/preempt_rt_versions

  29. Nikaein, N., et al.: Openairinterface: an open LTE network in a PC. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 305–308 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Giacobbi, G.: The GNU Netcat project. Accessed Nov 2021

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaltenberger, F., Wagner, S.: Experimental analysis of network-aided interference-aware receiver for LTE MU-MIMO. In: 2014 IEEE 8th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), pp. 325–328, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alyafawi, I., Schiller, E., Braun, T., Dimitrova, D., Gomes, A., Nikaein, N.: Critical issues of centralized and cloudified LTE-FDD radio access networks. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 5523–5528. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bhaumik, S., et al.: Cloudiq: a framework for processing base stations in a data center. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 125–136. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fajjari, I., Aitsaadi, N., Amanou, S.: Optimized resource allocation and RRH attachment in experimental SDN based cloud-ran. In: 2019 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Molnar, I.: Linux low latency patch. Accessed Dec 2021

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huang, S.-C., Luo, Y.-C., Chen, B.L., Chung, Y.-C., Chou, J.: Application-aware traffic redirection: a mobile edge computing implementation toward future 5g networks. In: 2017 IEEE 7th International Symposium on Cloud and Service Computing (SC2), pp. 17–23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Younis, A., Tran, T.X., Pompili, D.: Bandwidth and energy-aware resource allocation for cloud radio access networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 17(10), 6487–6500 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nikaein, N.: Processing radio access network functions in the cloud: Critical issues and modeling. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing and Services, MCS 2015, pp. 36–43, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Foukas, X., Nikaein, N., Kassem, M.M., Marina, M.K., Kontovasilis, K.: Flexran: a flexible and programmable platform for software-defined radio access networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International on Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, CoNEXT 2016, pp. 427–441, New York, NY, USA Association for Computing Machinery (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, H., Rajkumar, R.: Predictable shared cache management for multi-core real-time virtualization. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 17 (1) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Reghenzani, F., Massari, G., Fornaciari, W.: The real-time linux kernel: a survey on preempt_rt. ACM Comput. Surv. 52(1), 36 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xi, S., et al.: Real-time multi-core virtual machine scheduling in xen. In: 2014 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT), pp. 1–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pahl, C.: Containerization and the PAAS cloud. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2(3), 24–31 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Struhár, V., Behnam, M., Ashjaei, M., Papadopoulos, A.V.: Real-time containers: a survey. In: Cervin, A., Yang, Y. (eds.) 2nd Workshop on Fog Computing and the IoT (Fog-IoT 2020), volume 80 of OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs), pp. 7:1–7:9, Dagstuhl, Germany. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, Z., Kihl, M., Lu, Q., Andersson, J.A.: Performance overhead comparison between hypervisor and container based virtualization. In: 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp 955–962 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nikaein, N., Schiller, E., Favraud, R., Knopp, R., Alyafawi, I., Braun, T.: Towards a cloud-native radio access network. In: Mavromoustakis, C.X., Mastorakis, G., Dobre, C. (eds.) Advances in Mobile Cloud Computing and Big Data in the 5G Era. SBD, vol. 22, pp. 171–202. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45145-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Mao, C.N., et al.: Minimizing latency of real-time container cloud for software radio access networks. In: 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pp. 611–616 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cavicchioli, R., Capodieci, N., Bertogna, N.: Memory interference characterization between CPU cores and integrated GPUs in mixed-criticality platforms. In: 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  49. De, P., Mann, V., Mittaly, U.: Handling OS jitter on multicore multithreaded systems. In: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, pp. 1–12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Barletta, M.C., De Simone, L., Corte, R.D.: Achieving isolation in mixed-criticality industrial edge systems with real-time containers. In: 34th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2022). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Burns, A., Davis, R.I.: Mixed Criticality Systems-A Review (February 2022). (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reghenzani, F., Massari, G., Fornaciari. W.: Mixed time-criticality process interferences characterization on a multicore linux system. In: 2017 Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), pp. 427–434 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shekhar, S., Gokhale, A.: Dynamic resource management across cloud-edge resources for performance-sensitive applications. In: 2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID), pp. 707–710 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Singh, A.K., Shafique, M., Kumar, A., Henkel, J.: Mapping on multi/many-core systems: survey of current and emerging trends. In: 2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fried, J., Ruan, Z., Ousterhout, A., Belay, A.: Caladan: Mitigating interference at microsecond timescales. In: Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI 2020, USA. USENIX Association (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fornaciari, W., Pozzi, G., Reghenzani, F., Marchese, A., Belluschi, M.: Runtime resource management for embedded and HPC systems. In: PARMA-DITAM 2016, pp. 31–36, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Niknafs, M., Ukhov, I., Eles, P., Peng, Z.: Runtime resource management with workload prediction. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Design Automation Conference 2019, DAC 2019, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Khasanov, R., Castrillon, J.: Energy-efficient runtime resource management for adaptable multi-application mapping. In: 2020 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), pp. 909–914 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Khasanov, R., Robledo, J., Menard, C., Goens, A., Castrillon, J.: Domain-specific hybrid mapping for energy-efficient baseband processing in wireless networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 20(5s), (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Manvi , S.S., Shyam, G.K.: Resource management for infrastructure as a service (IAAS) in cloud computing: a survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 41, 424–440 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Alves, M.P., Delicato, F.C., Santos, I.L., Pires, P.F.: Lw-coedge: a lightweight virtualization model and collaboration process for edge computing. World Wide Web 23(2), 1127–1175 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Azarmipour, M., Elfaham, H., Grothoff, J., von Trotha, C., Gries, G., Epple, U.: Dynamic resource management for virtualization in industrial automation. In: IECON 2018–44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 2878–2883 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Begam, R., Wang, W., Zhu, D.: Timer-cloud: Time-sensitive VM provisioning in resource-constrained clouds. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 8(1), 297–311 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Doan, T.V., et al.: Containers vs virtual machines: choosing the right virtualization technology for mobile edge cloud. In: 2019 IEEE 2nd 5G World Forum (5GWF), pp. 46–52 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Foukas, X., Radunovic, B.: Concordia: teaching the 5g VRAN to share compute. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference, SIGCOMM ’21, pp. 580–596, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres F. Ocampo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ocampo, A.F., Bryhni, H. (2023). On the Realization of Cloud-RAN on Mobile Edge Computing. In: Barolli, L. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28694-0_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics