Abstract
According to the increasing possibilities offered by technological innovation, new ways of visualizing and exploring data are now accessible in the context of 3D digital documentation. Surveying small artifacts and accurately representing their geometry, however, remains challenging. This can be ascribed to the still high cost of the most popular equipment for that purpose (active sensors) as well as the requirement for professional expertise when employing less expensive methods (passive sensors).
This project aims to provide a low-cost configuration for an image-based approach to the demand for a digital survey and 3D representation of sub-millimeter morphological features. A portable USB microscope was used as equipment. The subject of the experiments is a cuneiform tablet belonging to the collection of Ghent University (Belgium) and datable to the end of the 3rd millennium B.C. More specifically, the study seeks to examine the geometry of the wedge-shaped impressions on the clay artifact. Going beyond the traditional practices of text analysis, an accurate representation of the cuneiform signs can be helpful for researchers in conducting comparative geometric studies. This goal can be enriched by recognizing from the analysis the type of stylus used to validate a manufacturing identity and a chronological classification. It is desirable that the data collected can then be shared, on the one hand, by enabling descriptive assessments even between different collections around the world and, on the other hand, by improving the promotion and interaction with the contents of a future exhibition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The most expensive systems, direct competitors of micro-photogrammetry nowadays, are structured light scanners. Among the best-performing ones currently available on the market, there are desktop scanners that achieve accuracies of 0.01 mm, resolution down to 0.03 mm, color acquisition, and marker-less registration. The cost is around €30,000 (e.g., artec3d.com/it/portable-3d-scanners/artec-micro). Whereas with slightly lower performance, the average cost can be around €10,000 (e.g., einscan.com/handheld-3d-scanner/einscan-pro-hd/). However, one also comes across low-cost scanners, i.e., from €500, which are naturally designed for non-professional applications, with correspondingly much lower accuracy and resolution and mostly for educational and/or amateur use, and which do not perform well enough for micro-metrological applications (e.g. it.shop.revopoint3d).
- 2.
It is noteworthy to point out that the reported magnification for Dino-Lite USB microscopes includes digital magnification forms. As the manufacturer advises, it is frequently more beneficial to compare the field of view in this instance rather than the magnification, that is, to compare the actual dimensions of the original object being enlarged to the final size of the object on the display.
References
Gallo, A., Muzzupappa, M., Bruno, F.: 3D reconstruction of small sized objects from a sequence of multi-focused images. J. Cult. Herit. 15(2), 173–182 (2014)
Hansen, H.N., Carneiro, K., Haitjemac, H., De Chiffrea, L.: Dimensional micro and nano metrology. CIRP Ann. 55(2), 721–743 (2006)
Caine, M., Magen, M.: Low cost heritage imaging techniques compared. In: EVA-Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, pp. 430–743. BCS Learning and Development Ltd., London (2017)
Collins, T., Woolley, S.I., Gehlken, E., Ch’ng, E.: Automated low-cost photogrammetric acquisition of 3D models from small form-factor artefacts. Electronics 8(12), 1441–1458 (2019)
Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F.: Optimized configurations for micro-photogrammetric surveying adaptable to macro optics and digital microscope. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLVI-2/W1-2022, 25–32 (2022)
Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F., Surdi, M.: Cuneiform tablets micro-surveying in an optimized photogrammetric configuration. Heritage 5, 3133–3164 (2022)
Cohen, J., et al.: iClay: digitizing cuneiform. In: Chrysanthou, Y., Cain, K., Silberman, N., Niccolucci, F. (eds.) The 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST, pp. 135–143. The Eurographics Association (2004)
Bogacz, B., Mara, H.: Digital assyriology—Advances in visual cuneiform analysis. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 1–22 (2022)
Homburg, T., Zwick, R., Mara, H., Bruhn, K.-C.: Annotated 3D-models of cuneiform tablets. J. Open Archaeol. Data 10, 1–8 (2022)
Official Website of the European Union. https://culture.ec.europa.eu/it/cultural-heritage/cultural-heritage-in-eu-policies/european-digital-heritage
Esmaeli, F., Ebadi, H.: Handy microscopic close-range videogrammetry. ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLII-4/W4, 65–67 (2017)
Mokobi, F.: Digital Microscope. https://www.academia.edu/42195781/Digital_Microscope
Dino-Lite. https://www.dino-lite.eu/it/component/eshop/am7013mzt?Itemid=0
Lavecchia, F., Guerra, M.G., Galatucci, L.M.: Performance verification of a photogrammetric scanning system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96(9), 4267–4279 (2018)
Clini, P., Frapiccini, N., Mengoni, M., Nespeca, R., Ruggeri, L.: SFM technique and focus stacking for digital documentation of archaeological artifacts. ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLI-B5, 229–236 (2016)
Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F.: Optimized configurations for micro-photogrammetric surveying adaptable to macro optics and digital microscope. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLVI-2/W1, 25–32 (2022)
Messerschmidt, L.: Zur Technik des Tontafel-Schreibens. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 9, 185–196, 304–312, 372–380 (1906)
Richardson, A., Smilansky, U.: Geometrical feature extraction for cuneiforms. In: Schaub, T., et al. (eds.) ECAI 2014 - 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1173–1178. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2014)
Cammarosano, M. The cuneiform stylus. Mesopotamia XLIX, 53–90 (2014)
Fisseler, D., Weichert, F., Müller, G. G.W., Cammarosano, M.: Towards an interactive and automated script feature analysis of 3D scanned cuneiform tablets. Sci. Comput. Cult. Herit. 1–10 (2013)
Cammarosano, M., Müller, G.G.W., Fisseler, D., Weichert, F.: Schriftmetrologie des Keils: Dreidimensionale Analyse von Keileindrücken und Handschriften. Die Welt des Orients 2–36 (2014)
Cuneiform Analyser. http://www.cuneiform.de
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F., Surdi, M. (2023). Geometrical Feature Identification of Cuneiform Signs on Micro-Survey Reconstruction. In: Brooks, A.L. (eds) ArtsIT, Interactivity and Game Creation. ArtsIT 2022. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 479. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28993-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28993-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28992-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28993-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)