Skip to main content

Geometrical Feature Identification of Cuneiform Signs on Micro-Survey Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ArtsIT, Interactivity and Game Creation (ArtsIT 2022)

Abstract

According to the increasing possibilities offered by technological innovation, new ways of visualizing and exploring data are now accessible in the context of 3D digital documentation. Surveying small artifacts and accurately representing their geometry, however, remains challenging. This can be ascribed to the still high cost of the most popular equipment for that purpose (active sensors) as well as the requirement for professional expertise when employing less expensive methods (passive sensors).

This project aims to provide a low-cost configuration for an image-based approach to the demand for a digital survey and 3D representation of sub-millimeter morphological features. A portable USB microscope was used as equipment. The subject of the experiments is a cuneiform tablet belonging to the collection of Ghent University (Belgium) and datable to the end of the 3rd millennium B.C. More specifically, the study seeks to examine the geometry of the wedge-shaped impressions on the clay artifact. Going beyond the traditional practices of text analysis, an accurate representation of the cuneiform signs can be helpful for researchers in conducting comparative geometric studies. This goal can be enriched by recognizing from the analysis the type of stylus used to validate a manufacturing identity and a chronological classification. It is desirable that the data collected can then be shared, on the one hand, by enabling descriptive assessments even between different collections around the world and, on the other hand, by improving the promotion and interaction with the contents of a future exhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The most expensive systems, direct competitors of micro-photogrammetry nowadays, are structured light scanners. Among the best-performing ones currently available on the market, there are desktop scanners that achieve accuracies of 0.01 mm, resolution down to 0.03 mm, color acquisition, and marker-less registration. The cost is around €30,000 (e.g., artec3d.com/it/portable-3d-scanners/artec-micro). Whereas with slightly lower performance, the average cost can be around €10,000 (e.g., einscan.com/handheld-3d-scanner/einscan-pro-hd/). However, one also comes across low-cost scanners, i.e., from €500, which are naturally designed for non-professional applications, with correspondingly much lower accuracy and resolution and mostly for educational and/or amateur use, and which do not perform well enough for micro-metrological applications (e.g. it.shop.revopoint3d).

  2. 2.

    It is noteworthy to point out that the reported magnification for Dino-Lite USB microscopes includes digital magnification forms. As the manufacturer advises, it is frequently more beneficial to compare the field of view in this instance rather than the magnification, that is, to compare the actual dimensions of the original object being enlarged to the final size of the object on the display.

References

  1. Gallo, A., Muzzupappa, M., Bruno, F.: 3D reconstruction of small sized objects from a sequence of multi-focused images. J. Cult. Herit. 15(2), 173–182 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hansen, H.N., Carneiro, K., Haitjemac, H., De Chiffrea, L.: Dimensional micro and nano metrology. CIRP Ann. 55(2), 721–743 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caine, M., Magen, M.: Low cost heritage imaging techniques compared. In: EVA-Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, pp. 430–743. BCS Learning and Development Ltd., London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, T., Woolley, S.I., Gehlken, E., Ch’ng, E.: Automated low-cost photogrammetric acquisition of 3D models from small form-factor artefacts. Electronics 8(12), 1441–1458 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F.: Optimized configurations for micro-photogrammetric surveying adaptable to macro optics and digital microscope. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLVI-2/W1-2022, 25–32 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F., Surdi, M.: Cuneiform tablets micro-surveying in an optimized photogrammetric configuration. Heritage 5, 3133–3164 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, J., et al.: iClay: digitizing cuneiform. In: Chrysanthou, Y., Cain, K., Silberman, N., Niccolucci, F. (eds.) The 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST, pp. 135–143. The Eurographics Association (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bogacz, B., Mara, H.: Digital assyriology—Advances in visual cuneiform analysis. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 1–22 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Homburg, T., Zwick, R., Mara, H., Bruhn, K.-C.: Annotated 3D-models of cuneiform tablets. J. Open Archaeol. Data 10, 1–8 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Official Website of the European Union. https://culture.ec.europa.eu/it/cultural-heritage/cultural-heritage-in-eu-policies/european-digital-heritage

  11. Esmaeli, F., Ebadi, H.: Handy microscopic close-range videogrammetry. ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLII-4/W4, 65–67 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mokobi, F.: Digital Microscope. https://www.academia.edu/42195781/Digital_Microscope

  13. Dino-Lite. https://www.dino-lite.eu/it/component/eshop/am7013mzt?Itemid=0

  14. Lavecchia, F., Guerra, M.G., Galatucci, L.M.: Performance verification of a photogrammetric scanning system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96(9), 4267–4279 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clini, P., Frapiccini, N., Mengoni, M., Nespeca, R., Ruggeri, L.: SFM technique and focus stacking for digital documentation of archaeological artifacts. ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLI-B5, 229–236 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F.: Optimized configurations for micro-photogrammetric surveying adaptable to macro optics and digital microscope. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLVI-2/W1, 25–32 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Messerschmidt, L.: Zur Technik des Tontafel-Schreibens. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 9, 185–196, 304–312, 372–380 (1906)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richardson, A., Smilansky, U.: Geometrical feature extraction for cuneiforms. In: Schaub, T., et al. (eds.) ECAI 2014 - 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1173–1178. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cammarosano, M. The cuneiform stylus. Mesopotamia XLIX, 53–90 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisseler, D., Weichert, F., Müller, G. G.W., Cammarosano, M.: Towards an interactive and automated script feature analysis of 3D scanned cuneiform tablets. Sci. Comput. Cult. Herit. 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cammarosano, M., Müller, G.G.W., Fisseler, D., Weichert, F.: Schriftmetrologie des Keils: Dreidimensionale Analyse von Keileindrücken und Handschriften. Die Welt des Orients 2–36 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cuneiform Analyser. http://www.cuneiform.de

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Antinozzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Antinozzi, S., Fiorillo, F., Surdi, M. (2023). Geometrical Feature Identification of Cuneiform Signs on Micro-Survey Reconstruction. In: Brooks, A.L. (eds) ArtsIT, Interactivity and Game Creation. ArtsIT 2022. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 479. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28993-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28993-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28992-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28993-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics