Skip to main content

Temporal SWARA-SPOTIS for Multi-Criteria Assessment of European Countries Regarding Sustainable RES Exploitation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology for Management: Approaches to Improving Business and Society (FedCSIS-AIST 2022, ISM 2022)

Abstract

This paper aims to introduce a novel Temporal SWARA-SPOTIS method for multi-criteria temporal performance evaluation of alternatives. The proposed method combines the Step-Wise Weights Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method for determining the significance values of particular periods and the Stable Preference Ordering Towards Ideal Solution (SPOTIS) method for the multi-criteria assessment of alternatives. The developed method was applied to construct a framework for assessing the sustainable use of renewable energy sources (RES) by European countries in various branches of the economy and industry, considering multiple criteria and the dynamics of change of the obtained results over time. The application of the proposed method is presented in an illustrative example covering the assessment of 30 selected European countries over the five years 2015–2019 with data from Eurostat. The presented approach proved its usefulness in the problem investigated and allowed obtaining reliable and straightforward results indicating that the best-scored countries regarding sustainable use of RES are dominantly the Nordic countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andreopoulou, Z., Koliouska, C., Galariotis, E., Zopounidis, C.: Renewable energy sources: using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 131, 31–37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bączkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B.: Towards sustainable energy consumption evaluation in Europe for industrial sector based on MCDA methods. Procedia Comput. Sci. 192, 1334–1346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bączkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., Wątróbski, J., Sałabun, W.: Methodical aspects of MCDM based E-commerce recommender system. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 16(6), 2192–2229 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bączkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., Yelmikheiev, M., Kozlov, V., Sałabun, W.: Comparative analysis of solar panels with determination of local significance levels of criteria using the MCDM methods resistant to the rank reversal phenomenon. Energies 14(18), 5727 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: Towards sustainability in E-banking website assessment methods. Sustainability 12(17), 7000 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: On the assessment of e-banking websites supporting sustainable development goals. Energies 15(1), 378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M., Fandrejewska, A., Atasever, M.: The contribution of socio-cultural aspects of smartphone applications to smart city creation. Poland-Turkey Comparison. Energies 14(10), 2821 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cucchiella, F., D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Koh, S.L., Rosa, P.: A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: a sustainability index. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 401–413 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Delponte, I., Schenone, C.: RES implementation in urban areas: an updated overview. Sustainability 12(1), 382 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dezert, J., Tchamova, A., Han, D., Tacnet, J.M.: The spotis rank reversal free method for multi-criteria decision-making support. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2020). https://doi.org/10.23919/FUSION45008.2020.9190347

  11. energyinpython: Towards the Temporal Multi-Criteria Assessment of Sustainable RES Exploitation in European Countries (2022). https://github.com/energyinpython/fedcsis-2022-RES

  12. Eurostat: Energy from renewable sources (2022). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/shares

  13. Faizi, S., Sałabun, W., Rashid, T., Zafar, S., Wątróbski, J.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in multi-criteria group decision making problems using the characteristic objects method. Symmetry 12(9), 1382 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091382

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Frini, A., Benamor, S.: Making decisions in a sustainable development context: a state-of-the-art survey and proposal of a multi-period single synthesizing criterion approach. Comput. Econ. 52(2), 341–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9677-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gökgöz, F., Güvercin, M.T.: Energy security and renewable energy efficiency in EU. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 96, 226–239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Sapuan, S., Ismail, M.Y., Bahraminasab, M.: A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 58(1–4), 411–420 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3366-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jankowski, J., Kolomvatsos, K., Kazienko, P., Wątróbski, J.: Fuzzy modeling of user behaviors and virtual goods purchases in social networking platforms. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 22(3), 416–437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-022-03-0416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jankowski, J., Sałabun, W., Wątróbski, J.: Identification of a multi-criteria assessment model of relation between editorial and commercial content in web systems. In: Zgrzywa, A., Choroś, K., Siemiński, A. (eds.) Multimedia and Network Information Systems. AISC, vol. 506, pp. 295–305. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43982-2_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Wątróbski, J., Kazienko, P.: Towards the tradeoff between online marketing resources exploitation and the user experience with the use of eye tracking. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawiński, B., Fujita, H., Hong, T.-P. (eds.) ACIIDS 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9621, pp. 330–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49381-6_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Urosevic, S., Maksimovic, M.: Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods. Acta Montanistica Slovaca 20(2), 116–124 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kizielewicz, B., Więckowski, J., Shekhovtsov, A., Wątróbski, J., Depczyński, R., Sałabun, W.: Study towards the time-based MCDA ranking analysis-a supplier selection case study. Facta Universitatis. Series: Mech. Eng. 19(3), 381–399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210130048K

  22. Kooij, H.J., Oteman, M., Veenman, S., Sperling, K., Magnusson, D., Palm, J., Hvelplund, F.: Between grassroots and treetops: Community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 52–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A.R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., Bansal, R.: A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69, 596–609 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Łatuszyńska, M., Nermend, K.: Energy decision making: problems, methods, and tools-an overview. Energies 15(15), 5545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, H.C., Chang, C.T.: Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 92, 883–896 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lombardi Netto, A., Salomon, V.A.P., Ortiz Barrios, M.A.: Multi-criteria analysis of green bonds: Hybrid multi-method applications. Sustainability 13(19), 10512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910512

  27. Marinakis, V., Doukas, H., Xidonas, P., Zopounidis, C.: Multicriteria decision support in local energy planning: an evaluation of alternative scenarios for the Sustainable Energy Action Plan. Omega 69, 1–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McIntosh, R.D., Becker, A.: Applying MCDA to weight indicators of seaport vulnerability to climate and extreme weather impacts for U.S. North Atlantic ports. Environ. Syst. Decisions 40(3), 356–370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09767-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neofytou, H., Nikas, A., Doukas, H.: Sustainable energy transition readiness: a multicriteria assessment index. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 131, 109988 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Piwowarski, M., Borawski, M., Nermend, K.: The problem of non-typical objects in the multidimensional comparative analysis of the level of renewable energy development. Energies 14(18), 5803 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Piwowarski, M., Miłaszewicz, D., Łatuszyńska, M., Borawski, M., Nermend, K.: Application of the vector measure construction method and technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution for the analysis of the dynamics of changes in the poverty levels in the European union countries. Sustainability 10(8), 2858 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sajjad, M., Sałabun, W., Faizi, S., Ismail, M., Wątróbski, J.: Statistical and analytical approach of multi-criteria group decision-making based on the correlation coefficient under intuitionistic 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 193, 116341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sałabun, W., et al.: A fuzzy inference system for players evaluation in multi-player sports: the football study case. Symmetry 12(12), 2029 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shabani, M., Dahlquist, E., Wallin, F., Yan, J.: Techno-economic comparison of optimal design of renewable-battery storage and renewable micro pumped hydro storage power supply systems: A case study in Sweden. Appl. Energy 279, 115830 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuş, A., Aytaç Adalı, E.: The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. Opsearch 56(2), 528–538 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Urli, B., Frini, A., Amor, S.B.: PROMETHEE-MP: a generalisation of PROMETHEE for multi-period evaluations under uncertainty. Int. J. Multicriteria Decision Making 8(1), 13–37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCDM.2019.098042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Król, R., Sałabun, W.: Green electricity generation assessment using the CODAS-COMET method. Ecol. Ind. 143, 109391 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Sałabun, W.: New multi-criteria method for evaluation of sustainable RES management. Appl. Energy 324, 119695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Sałabun, W.: pyrepo-mcda-Reference objects based MCDA software package. SoftwareX 19, 101107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Ziemba, E., Sałabun, W.: Sustainable cities and communities assessment using the DARIA-TOPSIS method. Sustainable Cities and Society, p. 103926 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103926

  41. Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Piotrowski, Z.: The selection of multicriteria method based on unstructured decision problem description. In: Hwang, D., Jung, J.J., Nguyen, N.-T. (eds.) ICCCI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8733, pp. 454–465. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86, 107–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ziemba, E.: The contribution of ICT adoption to sustainability: households’ perspective. Inf. Technol. People 32(3), 731–753 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2018-0090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ziemba, E.: The contribution of ICT adoption to the sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 59(2), 116–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1312635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zolfani, S.H., Chatterjee, P.: Comparative evaluation of sustainable design based on Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Best Worst Method (BWM) methods: a perspective on household furnishing materials. Symmetry 11(1), 74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010074

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was partially funded by National Science Centre, Poland 2022/45/N/HS4/03050

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Bączkiewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bączkiewicz, A. (2023). Temporal SWARA-SPOTIS for Multi-Criteria Assessment of European Countries Regarding Sustainable RES Exploitation. In: Ziemba, E., Chmielarz, W., Wątróbski, J. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Approaches to Improving Business and Society. FedCSIS-AIST ISM 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 471. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29570-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29570-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29569-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29570-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics