Abstract
A straightforward approach to handling missing values is dropping incomplete records from the dataset. However, for many forms of missingness, this method is known to affect the center and spread of the data distribution. In this paper, we perform an extensive empirical evaluation of the effect of the drop method on the data distribution. In particular, we analyze two scenarios that are likely to occur in practice but are not often considered in simulation studies: 1) when features are skewed rather than symmetrically distributed and 2) when multiple forms of missingness occur simultaneously in one feature. Furthermore, we investigate implications of the drop method for classification accuracy and demonstrate that dropping incomplete records is doubtful, even when test cases are dropped as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
N.B.: in the general case, this may affect training and test distribution, but it is unclear how. Homogeneity might increase, but the data might also become more scattered and hence variance might increase. Since the distribution can be affected in a wide variety of possible ways, we will simply ignore this effect; note that technically this might affect the definition of accuracy.
References
Acuna, E., Rodriguez, C.: The treatment of missing values and its effect on classifier accuracy. In: Banks, D., McMorris, F.R., Arabie, P., Gaul, W. (eds.) Classification, Clustering, and Data Mining Applications. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organisation, pp. 639–647. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17103-1_60
Brand, J.P., van Buuren, S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K., Gelsema, E.S.: A toolkit in SAS for the evaluation of multiple imputation methods. Stat. Neerl. 57(1), 36–45 (2003)
van Buuren, S.: Flexible Imputation of Missing Data, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2018)
van Buuren, S., Brand, J.P., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., Rubin, D.B.: Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 76(12), 1049–1064 (2006)
van Buuren, S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K.: MICE: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J. Stat. Softw. 45, 1–67 (2011)
Correia, A., Peharz, R., de Campos, C.P.: Joints in random forests. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 11404–11415 (2020)
García-Laencina, P.J., Sancho-Gómez, J.L., Figueiras-Vidal, A.R.: Pattern classification with missing data: a review. Neural Comput. Appl. 19(2), 263–282 (2010)
Garciarena, U., Santana, R.: An extensive analysis of the interaction between missing data types, imputation methods, and supervised classifiers. Expert Syst. Appl. 89, 52–65 (2017)
Hoogland, J., et al.: Handling missing predictor values when validating and applying a prediction model to new patients. Stat. Med. 39(25), 3591–3607 (2020)
Little, R.J.: Regression with missing X’s: a review. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87(420), 1227–1237 (1992)
Little, R.J., Rubin, D.B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, vol. 793. Wiley, Hoboken (2019)
Mangasarian, O.L., Street, W.N., Wolberg, W.H.: Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Oper. Res. 43(4), 570–577 (1995)
Miller, I., Miller, M., Freund, J.E.: John E. Freund’s Mathematical Statistics, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. (1999)
Raji, I.D., Kumar, I.E., Horowitz, A., Selbst, A.: The fallacy of AI functionality. In: ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 959–972 (2022)
Rubin, D.B.: Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3), 581–592 (1976)
Schafer, J.L., Graham, J.W.: Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol. Methods 7(2), 147 (2002)
Schouten, R.M., Lugtig, P., Vink, G.: Generating missing values for simulation purposes: a multivariate amputation procedure. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 88(15), 2909–2930 (2018)
Schouten, R.M., Vink, G.: The dance of the mechanisms: how observed information influences the validity of missingness assumptions. Sociol. Methods Res. 50(3), 1243–1258 (2021)
Schouten, R.M., Zamanzadeh, D., Singh, P.: pyampute: a python library for data amputation, August 2022. https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-212e5952-03e
Street, W.N., Wolberg, W.H., Mangasarian, O.L.: Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. In: Acharya, R.S., Goldgof, D.B. (eds.) Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 1905, pp. 861–870, July 1993
Toutenburg, H., Srivastava, V.K.: Shalabh: amputation versus imputation of missing values through ratio method in sample surveys. Stat. Pap. 49(2), 237–247 (2008)
Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M., Gama, J.: An overview of concept drift applications. In: Japkowicz, N., Stefanowski, J. (eds.) Big Data Analysis: New Algorithms for a New Society. SBD, vol. 16, pp. 91–114. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26989-4_4
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to dr. Wouter Duivesteijn and prof. Mykola Pechenizkiy for their continuous support in all possible ways. Thank you Hilde Weerts for being a sparring partner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schouten, R.M., Taşcău, V., Ziegler, G.G., Casano, D., Ardizzone, M., Erotokritou, MA. (2023). Dropping Incomplete Records is (not so) Straightforward. In: Crémilleux, B., Hess, S., Nijssen, S. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis XXI. IDA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30047-9_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30047-9_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30046-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30047-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)