Skip to main content

Speculation and Negation Scope Resolution via Machine Reading Comprehension Formulation with Data Augmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13945))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

As a key sub-task in the field of speculation and negation extraction, Speculation and Negation Scope Resolution (SpNeSR) focuses on extracting speculative and negative texts within sentences, i.e., distinguishing between factual and non-factual information, which means it is an important and fundamental task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) community. Previous work utilized various methods for SpNeSR that are quite domain-specific, and failed to build a unified framework with good generalization. In addition, they were limited by the sizes of datasets and ignored producing more samples for training, since SpNeSR is a data-hungry task. With consideration of the above problems, we not only propose a unified Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) formulation for SpNeSR, but also design a Data Augmentation (DA) method fit for scopes. Experimental results on several English and Chinese corpora manifest that both MRC and DA mechanism are effective, and our MRC model with DA is superior to several state-of-the-arts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apostolova, E., Tomuro, N., Demner-Fushman, D.: Automatic extraction of lexico-syntactic patterns for detection of negation and speculation scopes. In: ACL 2011, pp. 283–287 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, H., Xia, R., Yu, J.: Reinforced counterfactual data augmentation for dual sentiment classification. In: EMNLP 2021, pp. 269–278 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S., Aguilar, G., Neves, L., Solorio, T.: Data augmentation for cross-domain named entity recognition. In: EMNLP 2021, pp. 5346–5356 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: NAACL, pp. 4171–4186 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Du, X., Cardie, C.: Event extraction by answering (almost) natural questions. In: EMNLP 2020, pp. 671–683 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fancellu, F., Lopez, A., Webber, B.L.: Neural networks for negation scope detection. In: ACL 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farkas, R., Vincze, V., Móra, G., Csirik, J., Szarvas, G.: The CoNLL-2010 shared task: Learning to detect hedges and their scope in natural language text. In: CoNLL 2010, pp. 1–12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of CVPR 2016, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu, T., Chen, C., Huang, H., Chen, H.: Semantics-preserved data augmentation for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In: EMNLP 2021, pp. 4417–4422 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Konstantinova, N., de Sousa, S.C.M., Díaz, N.P.C., López, M.J.M., Taboada, M., Mitkov, R.: A review corpus annotated for negation, speculation and their scope. In: LREC 2012, pp. 3190–3195 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, H., Lu, W.: Learning with structured representations for negation scope extraction. In: ACL 2018, pp. 533–539 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, X., Feng, J., Meng, Y., Han, Q., Wu, F., Li, J.: A unified MRC framework for named entity recognition. In: ACL 2020, pp. 5849–5859 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, X., et al.: Entity-relation extraction as multi-turn question answering. In: ACL 2019, pp. 1340–1350 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, J., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Bi, W., Liu, X.: Event extraction as machine reading comprehension. In: EMNLP 2020, pp. 1641–1651 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., Chen, Y., Xu, J.: Machine reading comprehension as data augmentation: a case study on implicit event argument extraction. In: EMNLP, pp. 2716–2725 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mao, Y., Shen, Y., Yu, C., Cai, L.: A joint training dual-mrc framework for aspect based sentiment analysis. In: AAAI 2021, pp. 13543–13551 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morante, R., Blanco, E.: *SEM 2012 shared task: Resolving the scope and focus of negation. In: *SEM 2012, pp. 265–274 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Øvrelid, L., Velldal, E., Oepen, S.: Syntactic scope resolution in uncertainty analysis. In: COLING 2010. pp. 1379–1387 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Özgür, A., Radev, D.R.: Detecting speculations and their scopes in scientific text. In: EMNLP 2009, pp. 1398–1407 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Qian, Z., Li, P., Zhou, G., Zhu, Q.: Speculation and negation scope detection via bidirectional lstm neural networks. J. Software 29(8) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qian, Z., Li, P., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G., Luo, Z., Luo, W.: Speculation and negation scope detection via convolutional neural networks. In: EMNLP, pp. 815–825 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vincze, V., Szarvas, G., Farkas, R., Móra, G., Csirik, J.: The bioscope corpus: biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinform. 9(S-11) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wei, J.W., Zou, K.: EDA: easy data augmentation techniques for boosting performance on text classification tasks. In: EMNLP 2019, pp. 6381–6387 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, A.W., et al.: Qanet: combining local convolution with global self-attention for reading comprehension. In: ICLR 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, Y., Bethard, S.: How does Bert’s attention change when you fine-tune? an analysis methodology and a case study in negation scope. In: ACL 2020, pp. 4729–4747 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, Q., Li, J., Wang, H., Zhou, G.: A unified framework for scope learning via simplified shallow semantic parsing. In: EMNLP 2010. pp. 714–724 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zou, B., Zhou, G., Zhu, Q.: Tree kernel-based negation and speculation scope detection with structured syntactic parse features. In: EMNLP, pp. 968–976 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zou, B., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G.: Negation and speculation identification in Chinese language. In: ACL 2015, pp. 656–665 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their comments. This work was supported by national Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) via Grant Nos. 62006167, 62276177 and 61836007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Qian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qian, Z., Sun, T., Zou, T., Li, P., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G. (2023). Speculation and Negation Scope Resolution via Machine Reading Comprehension Formulation with Data Augmentation. In: Wang, X., et al. Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13945. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30675-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30675-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30674-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30675-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics