Skip to main content

How Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence influence Digital Sovereignty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2022)

Abstract

Digital Sovereignty is an ascending field that is viewed from a society, politics and enterprise perspective. When considering the situation from an economic standpoint, it is still unclear how to understand the issue of what businesses can do to strengthen their Digital Sovereignty. Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain are disruptive technologies that have significant impact on Digital Transformation. This article studies the relationship between Digital Sovereignty and novel technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain. A quantitative survey with 163 respondents is the empirical basis of the analysis. We propose seven measures to strengthen Digital Sovereignty: preserve Data Sovereignty, address concerns and create awareness, define responsibilities, co-create transformation, expand expertise, promote freedom of choice and measurement criteria. The proposed measures support formulating a Digital Sovereignty strategy to ensure the vision, goals and requirements for balancing heteronomy and autarky in a self-determined manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M.R., McCarthy, G., Rahman, M.: Transforming business using digital innovations: the application of AI, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Ann. Oper. Res. 308(1), 7–39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03620-w

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blossfeld, H.P., et al.: Digitale Souveränität und Bildung. Waxmann, Gutachten. Münster (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bons, R.W.H., Versendaal, J., Zavolokina, L., Shi, W.L.: Potential and limits of Blockchain technology for networked businesses. Electron. Mark. 30(2), 189–194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00421-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruckner, F., Howar, F.: Utilizing remote evaluation for providing data sovereignty in data-sharing ecosystems. In: 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2021). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.842

  5. Buhl, H.U., Schweizer, A., Urbach, N.: Blockchain-Technologie als Schlüssel für die Zukunft. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Kreditwesen 12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calp, M.H.: The role of artificial intelligence within the scope of digital transformation in enterprises. In: Advanced MIS and Digital Transformation for Increased Creativity and Innovation in Business. IGI Global (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carayannis, E.G., Christodoulou, K., Christodoulou, P., Chatzichristofis, S.A., Zinonos, Z.: Known unknowns in an era of technological and viral disruptions-implications for theory, policy, and practice. J. Knowl. Econ. 13(1), 587–610 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee, R., Chatterjee, R.: An overview of the emerging technology: blockchain. In: 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339

  10. Circiumaru, A.: The EU’s digital sovereignty-the role of artificial intelligence and competition policy. SSRN: 3831815 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalmolen, S., Bastiaansen, H., Kollenstart, M., Punter, M.: Infrastructural sovereignty over agreement and transaction data (’metadata’) in an open network-model for multilateral sharing of sensitive data. In: 40th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2019. Association for Information Systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bundesregierung, D.: Datenstrategie der Bundesregierung: Eine Innovationsstrategie für gesellschaftlichen Fortschritt und nachhaltiges Wachstum. Bundeskanzleramt, Berlin (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diekmann, G.: Digitale Souveränität: Positionsbestimmung und erste Handlungsempfehlungen für Deutschland und Europa. Bitkom, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dreo, G., Eiseler, V., Gehrke, W., Helmbrecht, U., Hommel, W., Zahn, J., et al.: Europäische Digitale Souveränität: Weg zum Erfolg?-Ein Bericht zur Jahrestagung CODE 2020. Zeitschrift für Außen-und Sicherheitspolitik 13(4), 399–404 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Europäische Kommission, Generaldirektion Kommunikationsnetze, Inhalte und Technologien Kommission: Ethikleitlinien für eine vertrauenswürdige KI. Publications Office (2019). https://doi.org/data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/22710

  16. Friedrichsen, M., Bisa, P.J. (eds.): Digitale Souveränität. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07349-7, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-07349-7

  17. Fries, I., Greiner, M., Hofmeier, M., Hrestic, R., Lechner, U., Wendeborn, T.: Towards a layer model for digital sovereignty: a holistic approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Critical Information Infrastructures Security (CRITIS 2022). Springer (2022). in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fritzsche, K., Pohle, J., Bauer, S., Haenel, F., Eichbaum, F.: Digitalisierung nachhaltig und souverän gestalten. DINA, Positionspapier, CO (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glasze, G., Odzuck, E., Staples, R. (eds.): Was heißt digitale Souveränität?: Diskurse, Praktiken und Voraussetzungen »individueller« und »staatlicher Souveränität« im digitalen Zeitalter. Transcript Verlag (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hartmann, E.A.: Digitale Souveränität: Soziotechnische Bewertung und Gestaltung von Anwendungen algorithmischer Systeme. In: Digitalisierung souverän gestalten II. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kagermann, H., Streibich, K.H.: Digitale Souveränität - Status quo und Handlungsfelder. acatech IMPULS (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, J., Suh, T., Roy, D., Baucus, M.: Emerging technology and business model innovation: the case of artificial intelligence. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 5(3), 44 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann, D.R., Gupta, S., Steckel, J.H., Gupta, S.: Marketing Research. Addison-Wesley Reading, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, Y., Huang, X., Dai, Y., Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y.: Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial IoT. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 16(6), 4177–4186 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Massaro, M.: Digital transformation in the healthcare sector through blockchain technology. Insights Acad. Res. Bus. Dev. Technovation, 102386 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merkel, A., Frederiksen, M., Marin, S., Kallas, K.: Letter to the President-Digital Sovereignty. European Commission, Berlin (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Müller-Böling, D., Klandt, H.: Methoden empirischer Wirtschafts-und Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung mit wirtschaftswissenschaftlichem Schwerpunkt 3 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Philipp, U.: Schriftliche Frage an die Bundesregierung (2022). https://mdb.anke.domscheit-berg.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/1-76-Domscheit-BergGeschwaerzt.pdf

  30. Pohle, J.: Digital sovereignty. a new key concept of digital policy in Germany and Europe. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Berlin (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pohle, J., Thiel, T.: Digitale Souveränität – Von der Karriere eines einenden und doch problematischen Konzepts. In: Der Wert der Digitalisierung: Gemeinwohl in der digitalen Welt. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shinde, P.P., Shah, S.: A review of machine learning and deep learning applications. In: 4th International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA). IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vogt, R.: Digitale Souveränität und Künstliche Intelligenz für den Menschen. In: Digitalisierung souverän gestalten. Springer Vieweg, Berlin (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weber, H.: Digitale Souveränität. Informatik Spektrum 1–12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, M., Chen, X., Kou, G.: A systematic review of blockchain. Fin. Innov. 5(1), 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-019-0147-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Project LIONS is funded by dtec.bw - Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr which we gratefully acknowledge. We would also like to thank Bayern Innovativ for funding the project “Federated Learning Enhancing IT Security (FLEIS)” (DIK 0241_2104_0080). We thank our partners and fellow researchers and all study participants.

Contributions can be attributed to the coauthors as described below:

– Martha Klare addressed the volunteers with the survey and wrote the results section on Digital Sovereignty in Enterprises (4.1).

– Lisa Verlande wrote the section Towards Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain in Enterprises (4.2) and the Implications and Discussions of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for Digital Sovereignty (4.3).

– Maximilian Greiner added implications regarding the Discussions on Blockchain for Digital Sovereignty (4.3).

– The authors jointly designed the study and co-authored the introduction (Sect. 1), methodology (Sect. 2), theoretical background (Sect. 3) and conclusion (Sect. 5).

– Ulrike Lechner contributed to the research design, data collection, interpretation and revisions of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha Klare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Klare, M., Verlande, L., Greiner, M., Lechner, U. (2023). How Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence influence Digital Sovereignty. In: Papadaki, M., Rupino da Cunha, P., Themistocleous, M., Christodoulou, K. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 464. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30693-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30694-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics