Abstract
Digital Sovereignty is an ascending field that is viewed from a society, politics and enterprise perspective. When considering the situation from an economic standpoint, it is still unclear how to understand the issue of what businesses can do to strengthen their Digital Sovereignty. Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain are disruptive technologies that have significant impact on Digital Transformation. This article studies the relationship between Digital Sovereignty and novel technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain. A quantitative survey with 163 respondents is the empirical basis of the analysis. We propose seven measures to strengthen Digital Sovereignty: preserve Data Sovereignty, address concerns and create awareness, define responsibilities, co-create transformation, expand expertise, promote freedom of choice and measurement criteria. The proposed measures support formulating a Digital Sovereignty strategy to ensure the vision, goals and requirements for balancing heteronomy and autarky in a self-determined manner.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M.R., McCarthy, G., Rahman, M.: Transforming business using digital innovations: the application of AI, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Ann. Oper. Res. 308(1), 7–39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03620-w
Blossfeld, H.P., et al.: Digitale Souveränität und Bildung. Waxmann, Gutachten. Münster (2018)
Bons, R.W.H., Versendaal, J., Zavolokina, L., Shi, W.L.: Potential and limits of Blockchain technology for networked businesses. Electron. Mark. 30(2), 189–194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00421-8
Bruckner, F., Howar, F.: Utilizing remote evaluation for providing data sovereignty in data-sharing ecosystems. In: 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2021). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.842
Buhl, H.U., Schweizer, A., Urbach, N.: Blockchain-Technologie als Schlüssel für die Zukunft. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Kreditwesen 12 (2017)
Calp, M.H.: The role of artificial intelligence within the scope of digital transformation in enterprises. In: Advanced MIS and Digital Transformation for Increased Creativity and Innovation in Business. IGI Global (2020)
Carayannis, E.G., Christodoulou, K., Christodoulou, P., Chatzichristofis, S.A., Zinonos, Z.: Known unknowns in an era of technological and viral disruptions-implications for theory, policy, and practice. J. Knowl. Econ. 13(1), 587–610 (2022)
Chatterjee, R., Chatterjee, R.: An overview of the emerging technology: blockchain. In: 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE). IEEE (2017)
Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339
Circiumaru, A.: The EU’s digital sovereignty-the role of artificial intelligence and competition policy. SSRN: 3831815 (2021)
Dalmolen, S., Bastiaansen, H., Kollenstart, M., Punter, M.: Infrastructural sovereignty over agreement and transaction data (’metadata’) in an open network-model for multilateral sharing of sensitive data. In: 40th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2019. Association for Information Systems (2020)
Bundesregierung, D.: Datenstrategie der Bundesregierung: Eine Innovationsstrategie für gesellschaftlichen Fortschritt und nachhaltiges Wachstum. Bundeskanzleramt, Berlin (2021)
Diekmann, G.: Digitale Souveränität: Positionsbestimmung und erste Handlungsempfehlungen für Deutschland und Europa. Bitkom, Berlin (2015)
Dreo, G., Eiseler, V., Gehrke, W., Helmbrecht, U., Hommel, W., Zahn, J., et al.: Europäische Digitale Souveränität: Weg zum Erfolg?-Ein Bericht zur Jahrestagung CODE 2020. Zeitschrift für Außen-und Sicherheitspolitik 13(4), 399–404 (2020)
Europäische Kommission, Generaldirektion Kommunikationsnetze, Inhalte und Technologien Kommission: Ethikleitlinien für eine vertrauenswürdige KI. Publications Office (2019). https://doi.org/data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/22710
Friedrichsen, M., Bisa, P.J. (eds.): Digitale Souveränität. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07349-7, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-07349-7
Fries, I., Greiner, M., Hofmeier, M., Hrestic, R., Lechner, U., Wendeborn, T.: Towards a layer model for digital sovereignty: a holistic approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Critical Information Infrastructures Security (CRITIS 2022). Springer (2022). in preparation
Fritzsche, K., Pohle, J., Bauer, S., Haenel, F., Eichbaum, F.: Digitalisierung nachhaltig und souverän gestalten. DINA, Positionspapier, CO (2022)
Glasze, G., Odzuck, E., Staples, R. (eds.): Was heißt digitale Souveränität?: Diskurse, Praktiken und Voraussetzungen »individueller« und »staatlicher Souveränität« im digitalen Zeitalter. Transcript Verlag (2022)
Hartmann, E.A.: Digitale Souveränität: Soziotechnische Bewertung und Gestaltung von Anwendungen algorithmischer Systeme. In: Digitalisierung souverän gestalten II. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2022)
Kagermann, H., Streibich, K.H.: Digitale Souveränität - Status quo und Handlungsfelder. acatech IMPULS (2021)
Lee, J., Suh, T., Roy, D., Baucus, M.: Emerging technology and business model innovation: the case of artificial intelligence. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 5(3), 44 (2019)
Lehmann, D.R., Gupta, S., Steckel, J.H., Gupta, S.: Marketing Research. Addison-Wesley Reading, Boston (1998)
Lu, Y., Huang, X., Dai, Y., Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y.: Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial IoT. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 16(6), 4177–4186 (2019)
Massaro, M.: Digital transformation in the healthcare sector through blockchain technology. Insights Acad. Res. Bus. Dev. Technovation, 102386 (2021)
McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR (2017)
Merkel, A., Frederiksen, M., Marin, S., Kallas, K.: Letter to the President-Digital Sovereignty. European Commission, Berlin (2021)
Müller-Böling, D., Klandt, H.: Methoden empirischer Wirtschafts-und Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung mit wirtschaftswissenschaftlichem Schwerpunkt 3 (1996)
Philipp, U.: Schriftliche Frage an die Bundesregierung (2022). https://mdb.anke.domscheit-berg.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/1-76-Domscheit-BergGeschwaerzt.pdf
Pohle, J.: Digital sovereignty. a new key concept of digital policy in Germany and Europe. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Berlin (2020)
Pohle, J., Thiel, T.: Digitale Souveränität – Von der Karriere eines einenden und doch problematischen Konzepts. In: Der Wert der Digitalisierung: Gemeinwohl in der digitalen Welt. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag (2021)
Shinde, P.P., Shah, S.: A review of machine learning and deep learning applications. In: 4th International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA). IEEE (2018)
Vogt, R.: Digitale Souveränität und Künstliche Intelligenz für den Menschen. In: Digitalisierung souverän gestalten. Springer Vieweg, Berlin (2021)
Weber, H.: Digitale Souveränität. Informatik Spektrum 1–12 (2022)
Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2004)
Xu, M., Chen, X., Kou, G.: A systematic review of blockchain. Fin. Innov. 5(1), 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-019-0147-z
Acknowledgments
The Project LIONS is funded by dtec.bw - Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr which we gratefully acknowledge. We would also like to thank Bayern Innovativ for funding the project “Federated Learning Enhancing IT Security (FLEIS)” (DIK 0241_2104_0080). We thank our partners and fellow researchers and all study participants.
Contributions can be attributed to the coauthors as described below:
– Martha Klare addressed the volunteers with the survey and wrote the results section on Digital Sovereignty in Enterprises (4.1).
– Lisa Verlande wrote the section Towards Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain in Enterprises (4.2) and the Implications and Discussions of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for Digital Sovereignty (4.3).
– Maximilian Greiner added implications regarding the Discussions on Blockchain for Digital Sovereignty (4.3).
– The authors jointly designed the study and co-authored the introduction (Sect. 1), methodology (Sect. 2), theoretical background (Sect. 3) and conclusion (Sect. 5).
– Ulrike Lechner contributed to the research design, data collection, interpretation and revisions of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Klare, M., Verlande, L., Greiner, M., Lechner, U. (2023). How Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence influence Digital Sovereignty. In: Papadaki, M., Rupino da Cunha, P., Themistocleous, M., Christodoulou, K. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 464. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30693-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30694-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)