Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Framework for Measuring Governments’ Digital Initiatives Including Open Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2022)

Abstract

Digital innovation and digital initiatives are generally recognized and considered to be the driving forces behind firm survival and success in the market. This is not the case in the public sector, where digital initiatives have suffered not only from a lack of research trying to explain them but also from a major lack of recognition of their importance. The government’s eagerness to introduce more digital initiatives for better e-government plays an important role in advancing the country. Digital initiatives in several governments are being overlooked, even though these days, private companies are competing to provide their customers with the best products and services. In this study, important attributes and sub-attributes of digital initiatives by governments are identified so that we can get a clearer picture of the government’s digital initiatives (GDIs). The attributes and sub-attributes are extracted and combined with the new, proposed attributes to make our all-encompassing framework (with the passage of time, maybe more attributes and sub-attributes can be added to the list). The identified attributes are either directly or indirectly related to projects under the government’s digital initiatives, which include open data for more transparent and accountable e-governance. The developed framework has been applied to Greece and Pakistan; the authors of the underlying study belong to Pakistan and Greece, and one more reason behind this is to measure the difference between the developing and developed countries’ GDIs and to evaluate the governments’ digital initiatives (GDIs) with respect to each attribute and sub-attribute. This research will help people understand the problems that governments face with GDIs and maybe provide recommendations for further development initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. United Nations: Country classifications, pp. 163–171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18356/036ade46-en

  2. Silver, B.J.: Country classifications. Forces of Labor, p. 204 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615702.009

  3. OECD, Government at a Glance - 2021 edition (2022). https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=66856

  4. Arfeen, M.I., Kamal, M.M.: Future of e-government in Pakistan: a case study approach. In: 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2014, no. 2003, pp. 1–13 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations, E-Government Survey 2022, The Future of Digital Government (2022). https://publicadministration.un.org/en/

  6. United Nations: World e-government rankings, pp. 9–35 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission: eGovernment Benchmark 2020: eGovernment that works for the people (2020). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2020-egovernment-works-people

  8. Wu, J.C.T., Tsai, H.T., Shih, M.H., Fu, H.H.: Government performance evaluation using a balanced scorecard with a fuzzy linguistic scale. Serv. Ind. J. 30(3), 449–462 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802248017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim, S.: web-based accountability disclosure: understanding performance and practices in the Malaysian states government, no. 04, pp. 678–699 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AG7SY

  10. Shuja, J., Alanazi, E., Alasmary, W., Alashaikh, A.: COVID-19 open source data sets: a comprehensive survey. Appl. Intell. 1296–1325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20107532

  11. Manley, L., Ariss, A., Gurin, J.: Sustainable development goals and open data. Digital Development (2015). https://blogs.worldbank.org/digital-development/sustainable-development-goals-and-open-data

  12. Charalabidis, Y., Flak, L.S., Pereira, G.V.: Scientific foundations of digital governance and transformation (2022). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-92945-9.pdf

  13. Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., Todorovski, L., Aristovnik, A.: A review of digital era governance research in the first two decades: a bibliometric study. Futur. Internet 14(5) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14050126

  14. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Mcclure, C.R.: Citizen-centered E-government services: benefits, costs, and research needs, pp. 137–142 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lourdestorres, V.A.: Public administration - 2011 - torres - performance measurement in Spanish local governments a cross‐case comparison study.pdf (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rehman, M., Kamal, M.M., Esichaikul, V.: Adoption of e-government services in Pakistan: a comparative study between online and offline users. Inf. Syst. Manag. 33(3), 248–267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2016.1188570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Irawan, B., Hidayat, M.N.: evaluating local government website using a synthetic website evaluation model. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Manag. 20(1), 449–470 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A.: Transparency-by-design: what is the role of open data portals? Telemat. Inform. 61(March), 101605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101605

  19. Suri, P.K., Sushil: Effectiveness of strategy implementation and e-governance performance. Eval. Program Plann. 92(December 2021), 102063 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102063

  20. Gonzalo, J., Ruiz, R., Antonio, J., Zarate, A.: Electronic government and digital literacy: temporal comparison in the use of electronic government and digital literacy : temporal comparison in the use of technology in Mexico, no. July (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E.: A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 26(1–2), 41–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bello, O., Akinwande, V., Jolayemi, O., Ibrahim, A.: Open data portals in Africa: an analysis of open government data initiatives. Afr. J. Libr. Arch. Inf. Sci. 26(2), 97–106 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rizun, N., Ciesielska, M., Pereira, G.V., Alexopoulos, H.C.: Mapping determinants of unintended negative consequences of disruptive technologies use in smart cities. In: Twenty-Ninth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A series of individual studies entiled: Pillars of Good Governance – Focus on State Audit Office of Hungary as a Supreme Audit Institution. State Audit Office of Hungary (2016). https://www.asz.hu/en/pillars-of-good-governance

  25. T. International the global coalition against Corruption: corruption perceptions index (2021). https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021/

  26. European Commission: The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Policies (2021). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi

  27. Ciesielska, M., Rizun, N., Chabik, J.: Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: a framework and case study. Telecomm. Policy 46(7), 102316 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C.: Designing, implementing, and evaluating user-centered and citizen-centered e-government. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 6(2), 1–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2010040101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saleh, A.A., Alyaseen, I.F.T.: E-governance system key successful implementation factors. Int. J. Perceptive and Cognitive Computin 8(1), 40–46 (2022). https://journals.iium.edu.my/kict/index.php/IJPCC/article/view/267%0A, https://journals.iium.edu.my/kict/index.php/IJPCC/article/download/267/163

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsan Ali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ali, M., Zlatinis, I., Alexopoulos, C., Charalabidis, Y., Euripidis, L. (2023). A Comprehensive Framework for Measuring Governments’ Digital Initiatives Including Open Data. In: Papadaki, M., Rupino da Cunha, P., Themistocleous, M., Christodoulou, K. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 464. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30693-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30694-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics