Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tailoring Persuasive Health Messages to the Predominant Ego State of Patients

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13832))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 650 Accesses

Abstract

Lack of patient engagement has long been a problem in healthcare for chronic disease management. We report a study that explored the feasibility of applying Transactional Analysis theory to tailor health messages to the patient’s predominant ego state, assuming that messages with a complementary communication approach will be better comprehended and efficacious in triggering the targeted health behaviours. These personalized health messages were constructed by field experts in co-creation workshops and tested by chronic disease patients with various predominant ego states via interviews and a survey. Our experiment did not support the hypothesized superiority of complementary communication but revealed a general patient preference for supportive and professional communication styles. Future studies should explore the long-term efficacy of complementary communication considering also situational and cultural factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization: Noncommunicable diseases country profile 2018 (2018). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274512

  2. Berne, E.: Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. Grove Press (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrence, L.: Applying transactional analysis and personality assessment to improve patient counseling and communication skills. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 71, 1–5 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitley-Hunter, B.L.: Validity of transactional analysis and emotional intelligence in training nursing students. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 2, 138–145 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, Y.: Physician-Patient Communication: Building a Better Relationship to Improve Medication Adherence. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/joursp/116/ (2016)

  6. Hirsh, J.B., Kang, S.K., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychol. Sci. 23, 578–581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anagnostopoulou, E., Magoutas, B., Bothos, E., Schrammel, J., Orji, R., Mentzas, G.: Exploring the links between persuasion, personality and mobility types in personalized mobility applications. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors, pp. 107–118. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0

  8. Halko, S., Kientz, J.A.: Personality and persuasive technology: an exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) Persuasive Technology, pp. 150–161. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Alqahtani, F., Meier, S., Orji, R.: Personality-based approach for tailoring persuasive mental health applications (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-021-09289-5

  10. Lawson, V.L., Bundy, C., Harvey, J.N.: The influence of health threat communication and personality traits on personal models of diabetes in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. Diabet. Med. 24, 883–891 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02155.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dutta-Bergman, M.J.: The linear interaction model of personality effects in health communication. Health Commun. 15, 101–116 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1501_5

  12. York, V.K., Brannon, L.A., Miller, M.M.: Increasing the effectiveness of messages promoting responsible undergraduate drinking: tailoring to personality and matching to context. Health Commun. 27, 302–309 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.585450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E.: Adaptive persuasive systems: a study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2209310.2209313

  14. Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., De Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Personalizing persuasive technologies: explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 38–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19, 123–205 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berne, E.: What Do You Say After You Say Hello? The Psychology of Human Destiny. Grove Press (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hough, M.: Counselling Skills and Theory 4th Edition. Hodder Education (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, I., Joines, V.: TA Today: A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace (1987). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v3i1.390

  19. Harris: I’m OK – You’re OK: A Practical Guide to Transactional Analysis. HarperCollins (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tao, M., Xie, X., Fang, Y., Zhao, X., Yin, B.: Ego-state focused patient profiling approach: validating the adapted and abbreviated version of ego state personality test. Philips Research China, Shanghai (2019). Unpublished internal company document

    Google Scholar 

  21. Updegraffa, J.A., Shermanb, D.K., Luystera, F.S., Mannc, T.L.: The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 249–257 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A.-G.L.A.A.: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

  24. Rains, S.A., Levine, T.R., Weber, R.: Sixty years of quantitative communication research summarized: lessons from 149 meta-analyses. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 42, 105–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1446350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., West, R.: The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6, 42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wobbrock, J.O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., Higgins, J.J.: The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 143–146. Association for Computing Machinery (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963

  27. IBM Corp.: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Booth, L.: Observations and reflections of communication in health care - could transactional analysis be used as an effective approach? Radiography 13, 135–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2006.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu, P.P., Yukl, G.: Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the united states and china. Leadersh. Q. 11, 251–266 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00039-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Attale, C., et al.: Therapeutic alliance and glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabetes Metab. 36, 499–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2010.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bickmore, T., Schulman, D.: Practical Approaches to Comforting. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007 Conference Human Factors Computing System, pp. 2291–2296 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Zhejiang University-Philips-Eindhoven University of Technology Brain Bridge Program sponsored by Philips Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philips Research, Shanghai, China

    Xinying Zhao, Mengzhe Tao & Bin Yin

  2. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Xinying Zhao & Panos Markopoulos

  3. Philips Design, Shanghai, China

    Yingting Chen

Authors
  1. Xinying Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengzhe Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yingting Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Panos Markopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinying Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Alexander Meschtscherjakov

  2. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Cees Midden

  3. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Jaap Ham

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Tao, M., Chen, Y., Yin, B., Markopoulos, P. (2023). Tailoring Persuasive Health Messages to the Predominant Ego State of Patients. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., Midden, C., Ham, J. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30932-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30933-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation