Abstract
Lack of patient engagement has long been a problem in healthcare for chronic disease management. We report a study that explored the feasibility of applying Transactional Analysis theory to tailor health messages to the patient’s predominant ego state, assuming that messages with a complementary communication approach will be better comprehended and efficacious in triggering the targeted health behaviours. These personalized health messages were constructed by field experts in co-creation workshops and tested by chronic disease patients with various predominant ego states via interviews and a survey. Our experiment did not support the hypothesized superiority of complementary communication but revealed a general patient preference for supportive and professional communication styles. Future studies should explore the long-term efficacy of complementary communication considering also situational and cultural factors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization: Noncommunicable diseases country profile 2018 (2018). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274512
Berne, E.: Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. Grove Press (1961)
Lawrence, L.: Applying transactional analysis and personality assessment to improve patient counseling and communication skills. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 71, 1–5 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710481
Whitley-Hunter, B.L.: Validity of transactional analysis and emotional intelligence in training nursing students. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 2, 138–145 (2014)
Fisher, Y.: Physician-Patient Communication: Building a Better Relationship to Improve Medication Adherence. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/joursp/116/ (2016)
Hirsh, J.B., Kang, S.K., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychol. Sci. 23, 578–581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349
Anagnostopoulou, E., Magoutas, B., Bothos, E., Schrammel, J., Orji, R., Mentzas, G.: Exploring the links between persuasion, personality and mobility types in personalized mobility applications. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors, pp. 107–118. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0
Halko, S., Kientz, J.A.: Personality and persuasive technology: an exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) Persuasive Technology, pp. 150–161. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)
Alqahtani, F., Meier, S., Orji, R.: Personality-based approach for tailoring persuasive mental health applications (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-021-09289-5
Lawson, V.L., Bundy, C., Harvey, J.N.: The influence of health threat communication and personality traits on personal models of diabetes in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. Diabet. Med. 24, 883–891 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02155.x
Dutta-Bergman, M.J.: The linear interaction model of personality effects in health communication. Health Commun. 15, 101–116 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1501_5
York, V.K., Brannon, L.A., Miller, M.M.: Increasing the effectiveness of messages promoting responsible undergraduate drinking: tailoring to personality and matching to context. Health Commun. 27, 302–309 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.585450
Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E.: Adaptive persuasive systems: a study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2209310.2209313
Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., De Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Personalizing persuasive technologies: explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 38–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.004
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19, 123–205 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
Berne, E.: What Do You Say After You Say Hello? The Psychology of Human Destiny. Grove Press (1972)
Hough, M.: Counselling Skills and Theory 4th Edition. Hodder Education (2014)
Stewart, I., Joines, V.: TA Today: A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace (1987). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v3i1.390
Harris: I’m OK – You’re OK: A Practical Guide to Transactional Analysis. HarperCollins (2004)
Tao, M., Xie, X., Fang, Y., Zhao, X., Yin, B.: Ego-state focused patient profiling approach: validating the adapted and abbreviated version of ego state personality test. Philips Research China, Shanghai (2019). Unpublished internal company document
Updegraffa, J.A., Shermanb, D.K., Luystera, F.S., Mannc, T.L.: The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 249–257 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.01.007
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1988)
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A.-G.L.A.A.: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Rains, S.A., Levine, T.R., Weber, R.: Sixty years of quantitative communication research summarized: lessons from 149 meta-analyses. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 42, 105–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1446350
Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., West, R.: The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6, 42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Wobbrock, J.O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., Higgins, J.J.: The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 143–146. Association for Computing Machinery (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963
IBM Corp.: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (2017)
Booth, L.: Observations and reflections of communication in health care - could transactional analysis be used as an effective approach? Radiography 13, 135–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2006.01.010
Fu, P.P., Yukl, G.: Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the united states and china. Leadersh. Q. 11, 251–266 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00039-4
Attale, C., et al.: Therapeutic alliance and glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabetes Metab. 36, 499–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2010.08.003
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
Bickmore, T., Schulman, D.: Practical Approaches to Comforting. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007 Conference Human Factors Computing System, pp. 2291–2296 (2007)
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from the Zhejiang University-Philips-Eindhoven University of Technology Brain Bridge Program sponsored by Philips Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, X., Tao, M., Chen, Y., Yin, B., Markopoulos, P. (2023). Tailoring Persuasive Health Messages to the Predominant Ego State of Patients. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., Midden, C., Ham, J. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30932-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30933-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)