Skip to main content

A Simple Model of Influence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph (WAW 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13894))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 232 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a simple model of influence in a network, based on edge density. In the model vertices (people) follow the opinion of the group they belong to. The opinion percolates down from an active vertex, the influencer, at the head of the group. Groups can merge, based on interactions between influencers (i.e., interactions along ‘active edges’ of the network), so that the number of opinions is reduced. Eventually no active edges remain, and the groups and their opinions become static.

Our analysis is for G(nm) as m increases from zero to \(N={n \atopwithdelims ()2}\). Initially every vertex is active, and finally G is a clique, and with only one active vertex. For \(m\leqslant N/\omega \), where \(\omega = \omega (n)\) grows to infinity, but arbitrarily slowly, we prove that the number of active vertices a(m) is concentrated and we give w.h.p. results for this quantity. For larger values of m our results give an upper bound on \(\mathbb {E}\,a(m)\).

We make an equivalent analysis for the same network when there are two types of influencers. Independent ones as described above, and stubborn vertices (dictators) who accept followers, but never follow. This leads to a reduction in the number of independent influencers as the network density increases. In the deterministic approximation (obtained by solving the deterministic recurrence corresponding to the formula for the expected change in one step), when \(m=cN\), a single stubborn vertex reduces the number of influencers by a factor of \(\sqrt{1-c}\), i.e., from a(m) to \((\sqrt{1-c})\,a(m)\). If the number of stubborn vertices tends to infinity slowly with n, then no independent influencers remain, even if \(m=N/\omega \).

Finally we analyse the size of the largest influence group which is of order \((n/k) \log k\) when there are k active vertices, and remark that in the limit the size distribution of groups is equivalent to a continuous stick breaking process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: The dissemination of culture: a model with local convergence and global polarization. J. Conflict Resolut. 41(2), 203–226 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, P., Dudek, A.: A gentle introduction to the differential equation method and dynamic concentration. Discrete Math. 345(12), 113071 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. Volume I

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flache, A., Mäs, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., Lorenz, J.: Models of social influence: towards the next frontiers. JASSS 20(4) 2 (2017). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/20/4/2.html

  5. Freedman, D.A.: On tail probabilities for martingales. Ann. Probab. 3, 100–118 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Holst, L.: On the lengths of the pieces of a stick broken at random. J. Appl. Prob. 17, 623–634 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Moussaïd, M, Kä mmer, J.E., Analytis, P.P., Neth, H.: Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PLoS ONE 8(11), e78433 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mukhopadhyay, A., Mazumdar, R.R., Roy, R.: Voter and majority dynamics with biased and stubborn agents. J. Stat. Phys. 181(4), 1239–1265 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-020-02625-w

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pyke, R.: Spacings. JRSS(B) 27(3), 395–449 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pymar, R., Rivera, N.: On the stationary distribution of the noisy voter model. arXiv:2112.01478 (2021)

  11. Yildiz, E., Ozdaglar, A., Acemoglu, D., Saberi, A., Scaglione, A.: Binary opinion dynamics with stubborn agents. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 1(4), 19:1–19:30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Radzik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cooper, C., Kang, N., Radzik, T. (2023). A Simple Model of Influence. In: Dewar, M., Prałat, P., Szufel, P., Théberge, F., Wrzosek, M. (eds) Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph. WAW 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13894. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32296-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32296-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32295-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32296-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics