Abstract
This study is focused on Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm in the context of solving continuous bound-constrained optimization problems. The mutation operator involved in DE might lead to infeasible elements, i.e. one or all of their components exceed the lower or upper bound. The infeasible components become the subject of a correction method, that deflects the algorithm from its canonical behavior. The repairing strategy considered in this work is a stochastic variant of the projection to bounds strategy, known as “exponentially confined”. The main aim of this study is to determine the analytical expression of the bound violation probability of components generated by mutation operator in conjunction with “exponentially confined”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali, M.M., Fatti, L.P.: A differential free point generation scheme in the differential evolution algorithm. J. Global Optim. 35(4), 551–572 (2006)
Arabas, J., Szczepankiewicz, A., Wroniak, T.: Experimental comparison of methods to handle boundary constraints in differential evolution. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds.) PPSN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6239, pp. 411–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_42
Gandomi, A.H., Kashani, A.R., Zeighami, F.: Retaining wall optimization using interior search algorithm with different bound constraint handling. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 41, 1304–1331 (2017)
Helwig, S., Wanka, R.: Particle swarm optimization in high-dimensional bounded search spaces. In: IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 198–205 (2007)
Kashani, A.R., Chiong, R., Dhakal, S., Gandomi, A.H.: Investigating bound handling schemes and parameter settings for the interior search algorithm to solve truss problems. In: Engineering Reports, 3(10), p. e12405 (2021)
Kreischer, V., Magalhaes, T.T., Barbosa, H.J., Krempser, E.: Evaluation of bound constraints handling methods in differential evolution using the cec2017 benchmark. In: XIII Brazilian Congress on Computational Intelligence (2017)
van Stein, B., Caraffini, F., Kononova, A.V.: Emergence of structural bias in differential evolution. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 1234–1242 (2021)
Kononova, A.V., Caraffini, F., Bäck, T.: Differential evolution outside the box. Inf. Sci. 581, 587–604 (2021)
Padhye, N., Mittal, P., Deb, K.: Feasibility preserving constraint-handling strategies for real parameter evolutionary optimization. Comput. Optim. Appl. 62(3), 851–890 (2015)
Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 11(4), 341–359 (1997)
Zaharie, D., Micota, F.: Revisiting the analysis of population variance in Differential Evolution algorithms. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1811–1818 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mitran, MA. (2023). A Theoretical Analysis on the Bound Violation Probability in Differential Evolution Algorithm. In: Georgiev, I., Datcheva, M., Georgiev, K., Nikolov, G. (eds) Numerical Methods and Applications. NMA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32412-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32412-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32411-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32412-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)