Skip to main content

Using the ITS Components in Improving the Q-Learning Policy for Instructional Sequencing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Augmented Intelligence and Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13891))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1028 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to optimize the sequencing of learning activities using the Q-learning, a reinforcement learning method. The Q-learning agent decides each time which activity to propose to the student. The sequencing policy we propose is guided by the aim to improve efficiently the student knowledge state. Thus, the Q-learning learns a mapping of the student knowledge states to the optimal activity to perform in that state.

In this paper, we tackle two main issues in implementing the Q-learning off-policy: the combinatorial explosion of the student knowledge states and the definition of the reward function allowing to improve efficiently the student knowledge state. We rely on the student model and the domain model to answer these two challenges.

We carried out a study to evaluate the approach we propose on simulated students. We show that our approach is more efficient since it achieves better learning gain with fewer activities than a random policy or an expert based policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E.A., Glenn, R.A., Koedinger, K.R.: Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. In: Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, vol. 2, pp. 522–560 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bassen, J., et al.: Reinforcement learning for the adaptive scheduling of educational activities. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clement, B., Roy, D., Oudeyer, P.Y., Lopes, M.: Multi-armed bandits for intelligent tutoring systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.3174 (2013)

  4. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 4, 253–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doroudi, S., Aleven, V., Brunskill, E.: Where’s the reward? Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 29(4), 568–620 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Efremov, A., Ghosh, A., Singla, A.: Zero-shot learning of hint policy via reinforcement learning and program synthesis. In: EDM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mandel, T., Liu, Y.E., Levine, S., Brunskill, E., Popovic, Z.: Offline policy evaluation across representations with applications to educational games. In: AAMAS, vol. 1077 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sen, A., et al.: Machine beats human at sequencing visuals for perceptual-fluency practice. International Educational Data Mining Society (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singla, A., Rafferty, A.N., Radanovic, G., Heffernan, N.T.: Reinforcement learning for education: opportunities and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08828 (2021)

  10. Sondik, E.J.: The optimal control of partially observable Markov decision processes. PhD thesis, Stanford University (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tessler, C., Mankowitz, D.J., Mannor, S.: Reward constrained policy optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11074 (2018)

  12. VanLehn, K.: Regulative loops, step loops and task loops. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26, 107–112 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3), 279–292 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Learning from delayed rewards (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yudelson, M.V., Koedinger, K.R., Gordon, G.J.: Individualized Bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amel Yessad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yessad, A. (2023). Using the ITS Components in Improving the Q-Learning Policy for Instructional Sequencing. In: Frasson, C., Mylonas, P., Troussas, C. (eds) Augmented Intelligence and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32883-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32883-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32882-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32883-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics