Skip to main content

Mobile English Learning: A Meta-analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technologies and Systems (ICWL 2022, SETE 2022)

Abstract

The advantages of mobile learning (m-learning) in English education have been widely described in previous research; however, there is little evidence of its effects on student outcomes. To fill this research gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of 54 empirical studies to measure its impact on student achievement. In addition, we estimated the moderating effects of the pedagogical approach, the learning environment, the education level, the control treatment, and the mobile device. The results indicate that m-learning has a large impact \((g=0.94)\) on students’ achievement. This effect is influenced by the pedagogical approach, the education level, and the control treatment, but not by the learning environment or the mobile device. Finally, we explain the nature of these results in light of learning theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. West, M., Vosloo, S.: Policy Guidelines for Mobile Learning. UNESCO, UNESCO Publishing, Paris (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. UNESCO: Global Education Coalition. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/globalcoalition

  3. Thomas, N., Bowen, N.E.J.A., Reynolds, B.L., Osment, C., Pun, J.K.H., Mikolajewska, A.: A systematic review of the core components of language learning strategy research in Taiwan. English Teach. Learn. 45, 355–374 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00095-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qiu, J.: A preliminary study of english mobile learning model based on constructivism. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 9, 1167–1172 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Orak, S.D., Al-Khresheh, M.H.: In between 21st century skills and constructivism in ELT: designing a model derived from a narrative literature review. World J. English Lang. 11, 166–176 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klimova, B.: Evaluating impact of mobile applications on EFL university learners’ vocabulary learning - a review study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 184, 859–864 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Santos, J., Figueiredo, A.S., Vieira, M.: Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: an integrative literature review. Nurse Educ. Today 72, 12–17 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., Rothstein, H.R.: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Talan, T.: The effect of mobile learning on learning performance: a meta-analysis study. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 20, 79–103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.1.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Güler, M., Bütüner, S.Ö., Danişman, Ş, Gürsoy, K.: A meta-analysis of the impact of mobile learning on mathematics achievement. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27, 1725–1745 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burden, K., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Hall, T.: Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school-aged students: a systematic literature review. Comput. Educ. 138, 83–100 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, J.H., Park, H.: Effects of smartphone-based mobile learning in nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Nurs. Res. (Korean. Soc. Nurs. Sci). 13, 20–29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sung, Y.T., Yang, J.M., Lee, H.Y.: The effects of mobile-computer-supported collaborative learning: meta-analysis and critical synthesis. Rev. Educ. Res. 87, 768–805 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, K., Lee, S., Joo, M.H., Becker, B.J.: The effects of using mobile devices on student achievement in language learning: a meta-analysis. Educ. Sci. 8, 13–15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., An, H.: The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 68(4), 1769–1789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, J.J., Lin, H.: Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 32, 878–919 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, M.L.: The impact of mobile learning on the effectiveness of english teaching and learning - a meta-analysis. IEEE Access. 10, 38324–38334 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., Stewart, G.: Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 555, 175–182 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pigott, T.D., Polanin, J.R.: Methodological guidance paper: high-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Rev. Educ. Res. 90, 24–46 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garzón, J., Kinshuk, Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., Pavón, J.: How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educ. Res. Rev. 31, 1–19 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glass, G.V.: Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ. Res. 5, 3–8 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris, S.B.: Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ. Res. Methods. 11, 364–386 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glass, G.V., Smith, M.L., McGaw, B.: Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Page, M.J., et al.: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 10, 1–11 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge, London (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedges, L.V., Olkin, I.: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Thalheimer, W., Cook, S.: How to calculate effect sizes from published research: a simplified methodology. Work. Res. 1–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.078915

  29. Hainey, T., Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., Wilson, A., Razak, A.: A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Comput. Educ. 102, 202–223 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Aubusson, P.: Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Comput. Educ. 121, 30–58 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. UNESCO: International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 2011. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Garzón, J., Acevedo, J.: Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning effectiveness. Educ. Res. Rev. 27, 244–260 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zakian, M., Xodabande, I., Valizadeh, M., Yousefvand, M.: Out-of-the-classroom learning of English vocabulary by EFL learners: investigating the effectiveness of mobile assisted learning with digital flashcards. Asian-Pac. J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ. 7, 1–16 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lipsey, M.W., Wilson, D.B.: Practical Meta-Analysis. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huedo-Medina, T.B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., Botella, J.: Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol. Methods. 11, 193–206 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Duval, S., Tweedie, R.: Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56, 455–463 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Schneider, M., Minder, C.: Bias in meta­analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenthal, R.: Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. (eds.) The Handbook of Research Synthesis, pp. 231–244 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Afreen, R.: Bring your own device (BYOD) in higher education: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Technol. Comput. Sci. 3, 233–236 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Garzón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garzón, J., Lampropoulos, G., Burgos, D. (2023). Mobile English Learning: A Meta-analysis. In: González-González, C.S., et al. Learning Technologies and Systems. ICWL SETE 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13869. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33022-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33023-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics