Skip to main content

A Two-Step Process for Analysing Teacher’s Behaviors Using a Scenario-Based Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technologies and Systems (ICWL 2022, SETE 2022)

Abstract

In this paper, we present research aiming to understand usage behaviors of elementary school teachers when using a scenario-based platform dedicated to the teaching of Computational Thinking concepts. In order to understand their behavior, we have defined a two-step analysis process to identify usage patterns on the platform. The first step consists of performing a clustering algorithm and the second one consists of characterizing each obtained cluster by a pattern mining algorithm. On the one hand, the k-means algorithm allows us to identify four significant clusters of teachers using the platform. On the other hand, the sequential pattern mining algorithm allows to characterize precisely the usage behaviors of each cluster. Thus, this two-step analysis process was evaluated with teachers data. We carried out an experimental study during two workshops with 29 teachers. Teachers interaction’s data were collected from ScenoClasse, resulting in a data-set of 498 traces. As a result, we identify different usage behaviors for teachers while using ScenoClasse. Based on their behaviors, teachers can be adapters, explorers, viewers, or beginners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://hourofcode.com/fr consulted on March 20, 2022.

  2. 2.

    https://www.scratchjr.org/ consulted on March 20, 2022.

  3. 3.

    https://fondation-lamap.org/projet/123-codez consulted on March 20, 2022.

  4. 4.

    https://scenoclasse.lip6.fr/.

  5. 5.

    Didapro9 is a colloquium that explores themes around teaching and learning of computer science: https://www.didapro.org/9/.

References

  1. Aslan, S., et al.: The impact of argumentation-based teaching and scenario-based learning method on the students’ academic achievement. J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 18(2), 171–183 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron, G.L., Drot-Delange, B.: L’informatique comme objet d’enseignement à l’école primaire française? mise en perspective historique. Revue française de pédagogie. Recherches en éducation (195), 51–62 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brunet, O., Yessad, A., Muratet, M., Carron, T.: Vers un modèle de scénarisation pour l’enseignement de la pensée informatique à l’école primaire. In: Didapro 8-DidaSTIC (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Lucas, E.P.: Discovering usage behaviors and engagement in an educational virtual world. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 18–25 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P.: Technology for classroom orchestration. In: New Science of Learning, pp. 525–552. Springer, Cham (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_26

  6. Han, J., Pei, J., Yin, Y.: Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. ACM Sigmod Rec. 29(2), 1–12 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hursen, C., Fasli, F.G.: Investigating the efficiency of scenario based learning and reflective learning approaches in teacher education. Eur. J. Contemp. Educ. 6(2), 264–279 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loughran, J.: Is teaching a discipline? implications for teaching and teacher education. Teachers Teach.: Theory Pract. 15(2), 189–203 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacQueen, J.: Classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: 5th Berkeley Symposium Mathematics Statistics Probability, pp. 281–297 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meldrum, K.: Preparing pre-service physical education teachers for uncertain future (s): a scenario-based learning case study from australia. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy 16(2), 133–144 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Özçınar, H.: Mapping teacher education domain: a document co-citation analysis from 1992 to 2012. Teach. Teacher Educ. 47, 42–61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pal, K.: Evaluation of a scenario-based Socratic style of teaching and learning practice. In: Enhancing Teaching and Learning With Socratic Educational Strategies: Emerging Research and Opportunities, pp. 121–144. IGI Global (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Séjourné, A., Voulgre, E., Reffay, C., Muratet, M.: Anr ie-care: Analyse d’un dispositif de formation initiale pour professeurs d’école stagiaires (pes) en informatique. communication du 13 octobre 2021 au symposium ie-care du colloque de l’université de cergy, l’école primaire au 21e siècle, france. In: L’école primaire au 21e siècle (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Selby, C., Woollard, J.: Computational thinking: the developing definition (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shih, A., Schrader, P.: Scenario based learning approach in teaching statics. In: 2004 Annual Conference, pp. 9–1083 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sorin, R.: Scenario-based learning: transforming tertiary teaching and learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th QS-APPLE Conference, Bali, pp. 71–81. James Cook University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Veznedaroğlu, M.: The effects of scenario based learning on attitudes and self efficacy beliefs of teacher candidates’ towards teacher proficiency. Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has been funded by the ANR IECARE. We thank Mathieu Muratet, Pierre Jean Lainé and Arnauld séjourné for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amel Yessad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kanaan, M., Yessad, A. (2023). A Two-Step Process for Analysing Teacher’s Behaviors Using a Scenario-Based Platform. In: González-González, C.S., et al. Learning Technologies and Systems. ICWL SETE 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13869. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33022-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33023-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics