Skip to main content

Abstract

Risk propagation encompasses a plethora of techniques for analyzing how risk “spreads” in a given system. Albeit commonly used in technical literature, the very notion of risk propagation turns out to be a conceptually imprecise and overloaded one. This might also explain the multitude of modeling solutions that have been proposed in the literature. Having a clear understanding of what exactly risk is, how it be quantified, and in what sense it can be propagated is fundamental for devising high-quality risk assessment and decision-making solutions. In this paper, we exploit a previous well-established work about the nature of risk and related notions with the goal of providing a proper interpretation of the different notions of risk propagation, as well as revealing and harmonizing the alternative semantics for the links used in common risk propagation graphs. Finally, we discuss how these results can be leveraged in practice to model risk propagation scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that we took COVER as primitive, which was itself subject to validation and proper comparison to the literature of risk in risk analysis and management at large (e.g., [6, 16, 17]).

  2. 2.

    From https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ and https://www.etymonline.com/.

  3. 3.

    [3] advances and ontology-based discussion on causation and event prevention.

References

  1. Aven, T., Renn, O., Rosa, E.A.: On the ontological status of the concept of risk. Saf. Sci. 49(8), 1074–1079 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Band, I., et al.: Modeling enterprise risk management and security with the archimate language - W172 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baratella, R., et al.: Understanding and modeling prevention. In: Guizzardi, R., Ralyté, J., Franch, X. (eds.) RCIS 2022, pp. 389–405. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cao, S., Bryceson, K., Hine, D.: An ontology-based Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhuri, A., et al.: Risk propagation and its impact on performance in food processing supply chain: a fuzzy interpretive structural modeling based approach. J. Model. Manag. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coso, I.: Enterprise risk management-integrated framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, vol. 2 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, X., et al.: Formation mechanism and coping strategy of public emergency for urban sustainability: a perspective of risk propagation in the sociotechnical system. Sustainability 10(2), 386 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng, X., et al.: Risk propagation mechanisms and risk management strategies for a sustainable perishable products supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 135, 1175–1187 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Engelberg, G., et al.: An ontology-driven approach for process-aware risk propagation. In: 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garvey, M.D., Carnovale, S.: The rippled newsvendor: a new inventory framework for modeling supply chain risk severity in the presence of risk propagation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 228, 107752 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garvey, M.D., et al.: An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: a Bayesian network approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243(2), 618–627 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. González-Rojas, O., et al.: Quantifying risk propagation within a network of business processes and it services. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(2), 129–143 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guarino, N.: On the semantics of ongoing and future occurrence identifiers. In: Mayr, H.C., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10650, pp. 477–490. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guizzardi, G., et al.: Ontological unpacking as explanation: the case of the viral conceptual model. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 356–366 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO: Risk Management - Vocabulary, ISO Guide 73:2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO: ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management - Guidelines (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang, J., et al.: Identifying propagation sources in networks: state-of-the-art and comparative studies. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19(1), 465–481 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kavallieratos, G., et al.: Cyber risk propagation and optimal selection of cybersecurity controls for complex cyberphysical systems. Sensors 21(5), 1691 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, M., et al.: Risk propagation analysis of urban rail transit based on network model. Alex. Eng. J. 59(3), 1319–1331 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Newman, M.: Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearl, J.: Graphical models for probabilistic and causal reasoning. In: Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision, pp. 367–389 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pearl, J.: Reverend bayes on inference engines: a distributed hierarchical approach. In: Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl, pp. 129–138 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 121–135. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin, K., et al.: Risk propagation based dynamic transportation route finding mechanism. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sunil, K., et al.: Message passing algorithm: a tutorial review. IOSR J. Comput. Eng. 2(3), 12–24 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was done in collaboration with Accenture Labs, Israel. The research conducted by Mattia Fumagalli is also supported by the “Dense and Deep Geographic Virtual Knowledge Graphs for Visual Analysis - D2G2” project, funded by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattia Fumagalli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fumagalli, M. et al. (2023). On the Semantics of Risk Propagation. In: Nurcan, S., Opdahl, A.L., Mouratidis, H., Tsohou, A. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science: Information Science and the Connected World. RCIS 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33080-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33080-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33079-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33080-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics