Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Taxonomy of Styles, Strategies, and Tactics in E-Negotiations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Group Decision and Negotiation in the Era of Multimodal Interactions (GDN 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Negotiation are essential in every day’s life, increasingly via electronic media. Due to a huge amount of negotiation styles, strategies, and tactics presented in the literature, it is unclear which combinations of strategies and tactics for a concrete style can be applied in (electronic) negotiations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review identifying combinations of negotiation styles, strategies, and tactics in electronic negotiations. The findings were consolidated into a taxonomy and patterns of the combinations were generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal, M., Chari, K.: Learning negotiation support systems in competitive negotiations: a study of negotiation behaviors and system impacts. In: 5th International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, pp. 1–23 (2009). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=904619

  2. Al-Agtash, S.Y., Al-Fahoum, A.A.: An evolutionary computation approach to electricity trade negotiation. Adv. Eng. Softw. 36(3), 173–179 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2004.07.008

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Jaljouli, R., Abawajy, J., Hassan, M.M., Alelaiwi, A.: Secure multi-attribute one-to-many bilateral negotiation framework for e-commerce. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 11(2), 415–429 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2016.2560160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Awasthi, S.K., Vij, S., Mukhopadhyay, D., Agrawal, A.J.: Multi Strategy Selection in E- Negotiation. In: Second International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies, pp. 1–5. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905138

  5. Awasthi, S.K., Vij, S.R., Mukhopadhyay, D., Agrawal, A.J.: Multi-strategy Based Automated Negotiation. BGP Based Architecture. In: International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation, pp. 588–593. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2016.7813789

  6. Baarslag, T.: Exploring the Strategy Space of Negotiating Agents. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28243-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Baarslag, T., Gerding, E.H., Aydogan, R., Schraefel, M.C.: Optimal negotiation decision functions in time-sensitive domains. In: International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 190–197. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2015.161

  8. Baarslag, T., Hendrikx, M.J.C., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.: Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 30(5), 849–898 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-015-9309-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baytalskaya, N.: The Effects of Machiavellianism, Perspective Taking, and Emotional Intelligence Components on Negotiation Strategies and Outcomes. Master Thesis, Pennsylvania State University (2017). https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/8158

  10. Bichler, M., Kersten, G., Strecker, S.: Towards a structured design of electronic negotiations. Group Decis. Negot. 12(4), 311–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024867820235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brzostowski, J.W.: Predictive Decision-making Mechanisms Based on Off-line and On-line Reasoning. Dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cairo, O., Olarte, J.G., Rivera-Illingworth, F.: A Negotiation Strategy for Electronic Trade Using Intelligent Agents. In: IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 194–200. IEEE Comput. Soc (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2003.1241193

  13. Cao, M., Peng, L.: Enabling computer to negotiate with human in e-commerce: a strategy model. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 369–376. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.52

  14. Cao, M., Luo, X., Luo, X., et al.: Automated negotiation for e-commerce decision making: a goal deliberated agent architecture for multi-strategy selection. Decis. Support Syst. 73(1), 1–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.012

  15. Cao, M., Wang, G.A., Kiang, M.Y.: Modeling and prediction of human negotiation behavior in human-computer negotiation. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 50(4), 101099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carbonneau, R., Vahidov, R.: A multi-attribute bidding strategy for a single-attribute auction marketplace. Expert Syst. Appl. 43, 42–50 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carbonneau, R.A., Vahidov, R.M.: A utility concession curve data fitting model for quantitative analysis of negotiation styles. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(9), 4035–4042 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, E.: An Electronic Market for Agent-supported Business Negotiations. Master thesis, Concordia University (2003). https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/2420/

  19. Cheng, W.-K., Ch, H.-Y.: Conflict resolution in resource federation with intelligent agent negotiation. In: Xu, H. (ed.) Practical Applications of Agent-Based Technology. InTech (2012). https://doi.org/10.5772/36189

  20. Choi, H.R., Kim, H.S., Hong, S., Park, Y.J., Park, Y.-S.: Study on the automated negotiation methodology for solving multi attribute negotiation. In: PACIS 63 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. El-Fangary, L.M., Kholeif, S., Afify, G.M.: Automated Negotiation Decision Making Approaches: Experimental Study (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Etukudor, C., Couraud, B., Robu, V., Früh, W.-G., Flynn, D., Okereke, C.: Automated negotiation for peer-to-peer electricity trading in local energy markets. Energies 13(4), 920 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robot. Auton. Syst. 24(3–4), 159–182 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(98)00029-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using Similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artif. Intell. 142(2), 205–237 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00290-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujita, K.: Automated strategy adaptation for multi-times bilateral closed negotiations. In: Ana, B., Michael, H., Alessio, L., Paul, S. (eds.) Proceedings of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (ACM Digital Library), pp. 1509–1510, Richland, SC (2014). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2615731.2616036#d18537779e1

  26. Ganesan, S.: Negotiation strategies and the nature of channel relationships. J. Mark. Res. 30(2), p. 183 (1993).https://doi.org/10.2307/3172827

  27. Goldman, A.: Negotiation. Theory and Practice. Wolters Kluwer Law Inter-national, Alphen aan den Rijn (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gratch, J,. DeVault, D., Lucas, G.: The benefits of virtual humans for teaching negotiation. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P. et al. (eds.) Intelligent Virtual Agents, vol 10011, pp 283–294. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_25

  29. Greenwald, A., Jennings, N.R., Stone, P.: Agents and markets. IEEE Intell. Syst. 18(6), 12–14 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2003.1249164

  30. Haberland, V., Miles, S., Luck, M.: Adaptive negotiation for resource intensive tasks in grids. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 241st edn., pp. 125–136 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hernandez-Leal, P., Kaisers, M., Baarslag, T., Cote, E.M. de: A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments. Dealing with Non-Stationarity (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M., Tykhonov, D.: A Multi-agent environment for negotiation. In: El-Fallah-Seghrouchni, A., Dix, J., Dastani, M., Bordini, R.H. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming, pp. 333–363. Springer, Boston, MA (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89299-3_10

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Jia-hai, Y., Shun-kun, Y., Zhao-guang, H.: A multi-agent trading platform for electricity contract market. In: International Power Engineering Conference, 1024–1029, vol. 2. IEEE (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEC.2005.207058

  34. Kamath, S., D'Souza, R.: An ANN based classification scheme for QoS negotiation to achieve overall social benefit in cloud computing. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2262–2271 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kelman, H.C.: Negotiation as interactive problem solving. Int. Negot. 1(1), 99–123 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1163/157180696X00313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kersten, G.E., Lai, H.: Negotiation support and e-negotiation systems: an overview. Group Decis. Negot. 16(6), 553–586 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9095-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kersten, G.E., Vahidov, R., Gimon, D.: Concession-making in multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations: theory and experiments. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 12(3), 166–180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kiruthika, U., Somasundaram, T.S., Raja, S.K.S.: Lifecycle model of a negotiation agent: a survey of automated negotiation techniques. Group Decis. Negot. 29(6), 1239–1262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09704-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Köszegi, S., Kersten, G.: On-line/of-line: joint negotiation teaching in Montreal and Vienna. Group Decis. Negot. 12(4), 337–345 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024879603397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kowalczyk, R., van Bui, A.: FeNAs: a fuzzy e-negotiation agents system. In: IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering, pp. 26–29. IEEE (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFER.2000.844592

  41. Lai, K.R., Lin, M.-W.: Modeling agent negotiation via fuzzy constraints in e-business. Comput. Intell. 20(4), 624–642 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0824-7935.2004.00257.x

  42. Lai, K.R., Lin, M.W., Yu, T.J.: Learning opponent’s beliefs via fuzzy constraint-directed approach to make effective agent negotiation. Appl. Intell. 33(2), 232–246 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-009-0162-2

  43. Lewicki, R.J., Barry, B., Saunders, D.M.: Negotiation, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lewicki, R.J., Saunders, D.M., Barry, B.: Negotiation. Readings, Exercises and Cases, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lin, R., Oshrat, Y., Kraus, S.: Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people's negotiation skills. In: 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 345–352. IFAAMAS, Richland, SC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L.: Learning to negotiate. Novice and experienced negotiators. In: Thompson, L. (ed.) Negotiation Theory and Research, pp. 77–97 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lopes, F., Novais, A.Q., Mamede, N., Coelho, H.: Negotiation among autonomous agents. Experimental evaluation of integrative strategies. In: Purtuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 280–288. IEEE (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/EPIA.2005.341231

  48. Ludwig, S.A.: Agent-based assistant for e-negotiations. In: An, A., Matwin, S., Raś, Z.W., Ślęzak, D. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4994, pp. 514–524. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68123-6_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Luo, X., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N., Leung, H., Lee, J.H.: A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artif. Intell. 148(1–2), 53–102 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00041-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Masvoula, M., Kanellis, P., Martakos, D.: A review of learning methods enhanced in strategies of negotiating agents. In: 2nd ICEIS, pp. 212–219 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Melzer, P., Schoop, M.: The effects of personalised negotiation training on learning and performance in electronic negotiations. Group Decis. Negot. 25(6), 1189–1210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9481-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Meyer, M.: an explorative study of the usage of negotiation styles in higher education. In: UK Academy for Information Systems Conference (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Miller, O.: The negotiation style: a comparative study between the stated and in- practice negotiation style. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 124, 200–209 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mirzayi, S., Taghiyareh, F., Nassiri-Mofakham, F.: An opponent-adaptive strategy to increase utility and fairness in agents’ negotiation. Appl. Intell. 52(4), 3587–3603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02638-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A Method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 336–359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Paliwal, A., Nabil, A., Atluri, V. et al.: Electronic negotiation of government contracts through transducers. In: Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 1–6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Park, J., Rahman, H.A., Suh, J. et al.: A study of integrative bargaining model with argumentation-based negotiation. Sustainability 11(23), 6832 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Patel, D., Gupta, A.: An adaptive negotiation strategy for electronic transactions. In: 10th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 243–252. IEEE (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2006.14

  59. Patrikar, M., Vij, S., Mukhopadhyay, D.: An approach on multilateral automated negotiation. Proc. Comput. Sci. 49, 298–305 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rahwan, I., McBurney, P., Sonenberg, L.: Towards a theory of negotiation strategy (a preliminary report). In: 5th Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rahwan, I., Sonenberg, L., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P.: Stratum: a methodology for designing heuristic agent negotiation strategies. Appl. Artif. Intell. 21(6), 489–527 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839510701408971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D.: Negotiation Analysis. The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ross, L., Stillinger, C.: Barriers to conflict resolution. Negot. J. 7(4), 389–404 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1991.tb00634.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Schoop, M.: Support of complex electronic negotiations. In: Marc Kilgour, D., Eden, C. (eds.) Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation, pp. 409–423. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Schoop, M., Jertila, A., List, T.: Negoisst: a negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce. Data Knowl. Eng. 47(3), 371–401 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(03)00065-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Shi, B., Sim, K.M.: A Regression-based coordination for concurrent negotiation. In: International Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security, pp. 699–703. IEEE (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECS.2008.114

  67. Sim, K.M.: A survey of bargaining models for grid resource allocation. SIGecom Exch. 5(5), 22–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1124566.1124570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sim, K.M.: Unconventional Negotiation: Survey and New Directions. In: ICEB (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sim, K.M.: Grid resource negotiation: survey and new directions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (App. Rev.) 40(3), 245–257 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2037134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sim, K.M., Wang, S.Y.: Designing flexible negotiation agent with relaxed decision rules. In: IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 282–289. IEEE Computer Society (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/IAT.2003.1241080

  71. Thomas, K.W., Kilmann, R.H.: Thomas-kilmann conflict mode instrument. Group. Organ. Stud. 1(2), 249–251 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Thomas, K.W., Kilmann, R.H.: Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode. Profile and Interpretitive Report (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Thompson, L.L.: The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson, Harlow, England (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Vahidov, R., Kersten, G., Saade, R.: An experimental study of software agent negotiations with humans. Decis. Support Syst. 66(3), 135–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Vahidov, R., Saade, R., Yu, B.: Effects of negotiation tactics and task complexity in software agent. In: Ishida, T., et al. (eds.) 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce e-Commerce in Smart connected World, pp. 1–5. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2971603.2971620

  76. Vahidov, R., Kersten, G., Yu, B.: Human-agent negotiations. The impact agents’ concession schedule and task complexity on agreements. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Vahidov, R., Saade, R., Yu, B.: The effects of interplay between negotiation tactics and task complexity in software agent to human negotiations. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 26(3), 50–61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Vetschera, R., Kersten, G., Koeszegi, S.: User Assessment of internet-based negotiation support systems: an exploratory study. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 16(2), 123–148 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327744joce1602_3

  79. Vetschera, R., Filzmoser, M., Mitterhofer, R.: An analytical approach to offer generation in concession-based negotiation processes. Group Decis. Negot. 23(1), 71–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9329-z

  80. Vij, S.R., Mukhopadhyay, D., Agrawal, A.J.: Automated negotiation in e commerce: protocol relevance and improvement techniques. In: 61th Computers Materials & Continua, pp. 1009–1024 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant. On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants. In: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research. CAIS, vol. 37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03709

  83. Wachowicz, T., Wu, S.: Negotiators’ strategies and their concessions. In: Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation, pp. 254–259 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Walton, R.E., MacKersie, R.B.: A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. An Analysis of a Social Interaction System, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Westbrook, K.W.: Risk coordinative Maneuvers during buyer-seller negotiations. Ind. Mark. Manage. 25(4), 283–292 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(95)00130-1

  86. Yinping, Y., Singhal, S.: Designing an intelligent agent that negotiates tact-fully with human counterparts: a conceptual analysis and modeling frame-work. In: 42th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1–10. IEEE (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.149

  87. Zulkernine, F.H.: A Comprehensive Service Management Middleware for Autonomic Management of Composite Web Services-based Processes. Canadian theses. Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Zulkernine, F.H., Martin, P.: An adaptive and intelligent SLA negotiation system for web services. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 4(1), 31–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2010.44

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hohenheim, Schwerzstrasse 40, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany

    Marlene Meyer & Mareike Schoop

Authors
  1. Marlene Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mareike Schoop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlene Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Yu Maemura

  2. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Masahide Horita

  3. Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Liping Fang

  4. Toulouse University, Toulouse, France

    Pascale Zaraté

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Meyer, M., Schoop, M. (2023). Taxonomy of Styles, Strategies, and Tactics in E-Negotiations. In: Maemura, Y., Horita, M., Fang, L., Zaraté, P. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation in the Era of Multimodal Interactions. GDN 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 478. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33780-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33780-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33780-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics