Skip to main content

Segmentation and Classification Networks for Corn/Weed Detection Under Excessive Field Variabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition (MCPR 2023)

Abstract

The control of weeds at earlier stages is one of the most relevant tasks in agriculture. However, the detection of plants in environments with uncontrolled conditions is still a challenge. Hence, a deep learning-based approach to address this problem has been proposed in this work. On the one hand, a CNN model based on the UNet architecture has been used to segment plants. On the other hand, a MobileNetV2-based architecture has been implemented to classify different types of plants, in this case, corn, monocotyledon weed species, and dicotyledon weed species. For training the models, a large image dataset was first created and manually annotated. The performance of the segmentation network achieves a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 84.27% and a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 74.21%. The performance of the classification model obtained an accuracy, precision, recall, and \(F_1\)-score of 96.36%, 96.68%, 96.34%, and 96.34%, respectively. Then, as the results indicated, the proposed approach is an advantageous alternative for farmers since it provides a way for crop/weed detection in natural field conditions.

No financial organization to declare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das, M., Bias, A.: DeepVeg: deep learning model for segmentation of weed, canola, and canola flea beetle damage. IEEE Access 9, 119367–119380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3108003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L. J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L.: ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 248–255. IEEE, Miami (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fawakherji, M., Youssef, A., Bloisi, D.D., Pretto, A., Nardi, D.: Crop and weed classification using pixel-wise segmentation on ground and aerial images. Int. J. Rob. Comput. 2(1), 39–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35708/RC1869-126258

  4. Gianessi, L.P.: The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production. Pest Manag. Sci. 69(10), 1099–1105 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, J., French, A.P., Pound, M.P., He, Y., Pridmore, T.P., Pieters, J.G.: Deep convolutional neural networks for image-based Convolvulus sepium detection in sugar beet fields. Plant Methods 19, 29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00570-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haralick, R.M., Shapiro, L.G.: Computer and Robot Vision, vol. 1, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., Boston (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hashemi-Beni, L., Gebrehiwot, A., Karimoddini, A., Shahbazi, A., Dorbu, F.: Deep convolutional neural networks for weeds and crops discrimination from UAS imagery. Front. Remote Sens. 3, 755939 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.755939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu, C., Sapkota, B.B., Thomasson, J.A., Bagavathiannan, M.V.: Influence of image quality and light consistency on the performance of convolutional neural networks for weed mapping. Remote Sens. 13, 2140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hussain, N., et al.: Design and development of a smart variable rate sprayer using deep learning. Remote Sens. 12, 4091 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy, H.J., et al.: Crop signal markers facilitate crop detection and weed removal from lettuce and tomato by an intelligent cultivator. Weed Technol. 34, 342–350 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Milioto, A., Lottes, P., Stachniss, C.: Real-time semantic segmentation of crop and weed for precision agriculture robots leveraging background knowledge in CNNs. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2229–2235. IEEE, Brisbane (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460962

  12. Nedeljković, D., Knežević, S., Božić, D., Vrbničanin, S.: Critical time for weed removal in Corn as influenced by planting pattern and PRE herbicides. Agriculture 11, 587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Partel, V., Kakarla, S.C., Ampatzidis, Y.: Development and evaluation of low-cost and smart technology for precision weed management utilizing artificial intelligence. Comput. Electron. Agric. 157, 339–350 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Picon, A., San-Emeterio, M.G., Bereciartua-Perez, A., Klukas, C., Eggers, T., Navarro-Mestre, R.: Deep learning-based segmentation of multiple species of weeds in corn crop using synthetic and real image datasets. Comput. Electron. Agric. 194, 106719 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Quan, L., Wu, B., Mao, S., Yang, C., Li, H.: An instance segmentation-based method to obtain the leaf age and plant centre of weeds in complex field environments. Sensors 21, 3389 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., Chen, L-C.: MobileNetV2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pp. 4510–4520 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474

  18. Wang, H., Liu, W., Zhao, K., Yu, H., Zhang, J., Wang, J.: Evaluation of weed control efficacy and crop safety of the new HPPD-inhibiting herbicide-QYR301. Sci. Rep. 8, 7910 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26223-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, A., Zhang, W., Wei, X.: A review on weed detection using ground-based machine vision and image preprocessing techniques. Comput. Electron. Agric. 158, 226–240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Garibaldi-Márquez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garibaldi-Márquez, F., Flores, G., Valentín-Coronado, L.M. (2023). Segmentation and Classification Networks for Corn/Weed Detection Under Excessive Field Variabilities. In: Rodríguez-González, A.Y., Pérez-Espinosa, H., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F., Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A., Olvera-López, J.A. (eds) Pattern Recognition. MCPR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13902. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33783-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33783-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33782-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33783-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics