Skip to main content

Improving Stroke Trace Classification Explainability Through Counterexamples

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13897))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1103 Accesses

Abstract

Deep learning process trace classification is proving powerful in several application domains, including medical ones; however, classification results are typically not explainable, an issue which is particularly relevant in medicine.

In our recent work we tackled this problem, by proposing trace saliency maps, a novel tool able to highlight what trace activities are particularly significant for the classification task. A trace saliency map is built by generating artificial perturbations of the trace at hand that are classified in the same class as the original one, called examples.

In this paper, we investigate the role of counterexamples (i.e., artificial perturbations that are classified in a different class with respect to the original trace) in refining trace saliency map information, thus improving explainability. We test the approach in the domain of stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alom, M.Z., et al.: A state-of-the-art survey on deep learning theory and architectures. Electronics 8(3), 292 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breuker, D., Matzner, M., Delfmann, P., Becker, J.: Comprehensible predictive models for business processes. MIS Q. 40, 1009–1034 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D.: A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(5), 1–4 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.E.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leonardi, G., Montani, S., Striani, M.: Explainable process trace classification: An application to stroke. J. Biomed. Informatics 126, 103981 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Makhzani, A., Shlens, J., Jaitly, N., Goodfellow, I., Frey, B.: Adversarial autoencoders (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Montani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Leonardi, G., Montani, S., Striani, M. (2023). Improving Stroke Trace Classification Explainability Through Counterexamples. In: Juarez, J.M., Marcos, M., Stiglic, G., Tucker, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13897. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34344-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34344-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34343-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34344-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics