Skip to main content

Decision Tree Approaches to Select High Risk Patients for Lung Cancer Screening Based on the UK Primary Care Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2023)

Abstract

Lung cancer has the highest cancer mortality rate in the UK. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage because common symptoms for lung cancer such as cough, pain, dyspnoea and anorexia are also present in other diseases. This partly attributes towards the low survival rate. Therefore, it is crucial to screen high risk patients for lung cancer at an early stage through computed tomography (CT) scans. As shown in a previous study, for patients who were screened for lung cancer and were identified with stage I lung cancer, the estimated survival rate was 88% compared to only 5% who have stage IV lung cancer. This paper aims to build tree-based machine learning models for predicting lung cancer risk by extracting significant factors associated with lung cancer. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data was used in this study which are anonymised patient data collected from 945 general practices across the UK. Two tree-based models (decision trees and random forest) are developed and implemented. The performance of the two models is compared with a logistic regression model in terms of accuracy, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity, and both achieve better results. However, as for interpretability, it was found that, unlike coefficients in logistic regression, the default feature importance is non-negative in random forests and decision trees. This makes tree-based models less interpretable than logistic regression.

Supported by Nottingham Trent University Medical Technologies and Advanced Materials Strategic Research Theme. Teena Rai is funded by NTU VC PhD studentship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Briggs, E., de Kamps, M., Hamilton, W., Johnson, O., McInerney, C.D., Neal, R.D.: Machine learning for risk prediction of Oesophago-gastric cancer in primary care: comparison with existing risk-assessment tools. Cancers 14(20), 5023 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassidy, A., et al.: The LLP risk model: an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer 98(2), 270–276 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Doll, R., Peto, R., Boreham, J., Sutherland, I.: Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ 328(7455), 1519 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Durham, A.L., Adcock, I.M.: The Relationship between COPD and Lung Cancer. Lung Can. 90(2), 121–127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gould, M.K., Huang, B.Z., Tammemagi, M.C., Kinar, Y., Shiff, R.: Machine learning for early lung cancer identification using routine clinical and laboratory data. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 204(4), 445–453 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202007-2791OC

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, X.-Y., Wu, J., Zhou, Z.-H.: Exploratory undersampling for class-imbalance learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 39(2), 539–550 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2007853

  7. Raji, O.Y., et al.: Predictive accuracy of the liverpool lung project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Ann. Int. Med. 157(4), 242–250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00004

  8. Sagi, O., Rokach, L.: Explainable decision forest: transforming a decision forest into an interpretable tree. Inf. Fusion 61, 124–138 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen, Y., et al.: A logistic regression approach to a joint classification and feature selection in lung cancer screening using CPRD data. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Health Informatics (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tammemägi, M.C., et al.: Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 368(8), 728–736 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tammemägi, M.C., et al.: Development and validation of a multivariable lung cancer risk prediction model that includes low-dose computed tomography screening results: a secondary analysis of data from the national lung screening trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2(3), e190204 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teena Rai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rai, T. et al. (2023). Decision Tree Approaches to Select High Risk Patients for Lung Cancer Screening Based on the UK Primary Care Data. In: Juarez, J.M., Marcos, M., Stiglic, G., Tucker, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13897. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34344-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34344-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34343-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34344-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics