Abstract
Digital technology is increasingly part of people's daily lives, including education. Thus, with growing interest in the educational use of robotics, one of the observed barriers is the incorporation of this content into schools. Because this inclusion cannot be guaranteed by technology access alone, it requires contextual development, critical and interactive. The context of educational robotics requires complexity at different school levels and creativity to solve problems. Therefore, the playful presentation of this content proves to be an excellent choice, especially for children, as it promotes children's logical thinking and physical and social skills through playful activities. Based on this context, this paper takes interaction design principles to evaluate the use of gamification artifacts to support introductory programming courses for children. In this study, the Roboquedo interaction test was evaluated. Its principles, in addition to using free technology with the potential for collaboration, are low-cost projects and a methodological approach based on social constructivist epistemology. Based on the interaction analysis, any adjustments needed to improve the applied principles and deliverables of interaction design and other possibilities of educational robotics and digital inclusion may be reflected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
PET (Tutorial Education Program) groups are formed by university students under the tutelage of professors with the objective of offering students actions to carry out activities included in the pillars of research, teaching and extension, aiming at a differentiated training of its members.
- 2.
The concept of "open access" for Swan, [16]: "Must be available for download, copy, distribution, print, search or link to the full texts of these papers, crawl for indexing, pass them as data to a software, or use for any other lawful purpose”.
- 3.
Research Project Approved by the Research Ethics Committee under number CAAE 35555420.7.0000.5547. Implementation period: 2020 to 2022.
References
Alimisis, D., Kynigos, C.: Constructionism and robotics in education. In: Teacher Education on Robotic-Enhanced Constructivist Pedagogical Methods, pp. 11–26 (2009)
de Almeida, D., Riccio, N.C.R: Autonomia, liberdade e software livre: algumas reflexões. Inclusão digital (2011)
Almeida, P.: Educação lúdica: técnicas e jogos pedagógicos. São Paulo (2003)
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR NM 300–1: Segurança de Brinquedos, (2004)
Barros, G., et al.: Learning interactions: robotics supporting the classroom. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCI International 2021 - Posters. CCIS, vol. 1421, pp. 3–10. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_1
Bonilla, M.H.S., De Luca, N.: Inclusão digital: polêmica contemporânea. EDUFBA (2011). https://doi.org/10.7476/9788523212063
Brasil. Ministério da Educação (MEC): Secretaria de Educação Básica. Base Nacional Comum Curricular (2017). http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br. Accessed 07 Jan 2023
Dallabona, S.R., Mendes, S.M.S.: O lúdico na educação infantil: jogar, brincar, uma forma de educar. Revista de divulgação técnico-científica do ICPG 1(4), 107–112 (2004)
Freire, P., Pedagogia do oprimido. rev. e atual. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, pp. 95–101 (2011)
Montero, M.: Introducción a la psicología comunitaria: Desarrollo, conceptos y procesos. Paidós (2004)
Projeto de Pesquisa Aprovado no Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa sob número CAAE 35555420.7.0000.5547. Período de realização: 2020 a 2022
Raabe, A., Brackmann, C. P., Campos, F.R.: Currículo de referência em tecnologia e computação: da educação infantil ao ensino fundamental. Centro de Inovação para a Educação Básica-CIEB (2018)
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Indianapolis (2011)
Santos, S.M.P.: O lúdico na formação do educador. Vozes, Petrópolis (1997)
Silveira, S.A.: Exclusão digital: a miséria na era da informação. Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo (2001)
Swan, A.: Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, França (2012)
Vygotsky, L.S.: Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Sov. Psychol. 5(3), 6–18 (1967)
Acknowledgements
To Tutorial Education Program – Connections of Knowledge – Ministry of Education (MEC), Secretariat of Higher Education (SESu) and Secretariat of Continuing Education, Literacy and Diversity (SECAD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Oliveira, M., Paschoalin, L., Teixeira, V., Amaral, M., Almeida, L. (2023). Thinking Open and Ludic Educational Robotics: Considerations Based on the Interaction Design Principles. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34549-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34550-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)