Abstract
Humanoid/social robots have gained popularity in recent years as an integrative aid for teaching, learning, and evaluation in educational settings. These robots can interact with students in a more natural and human-like manner, providing a unique learning experience. However, the integration of humanoid/social robots in education is still a new concept, and further research is needed to understand their usage in educational settings. In this systematic literature review (SLR), we analyzed 36 relevant publications (out of 381 initially identified) on the use of pedagogical models with robots in various roles and educational settings. Results showed that different pedagogical models are used in various educational settings, depending on the age and level of students and the type of robot used. Clustering analysis using the k-means method was performed, with three clusters identified as the optimal number using the elbow method. Results suggest that non-human-like robots are used to implement the behaviorist model as tools for teachers in elementary schools, while human-like robots are used to implement the social constructivism and cognitivist models as teachers or assistants in higher grades. This systematic literature review highlights the need for continued research on the use of robots in education and the various pedagogical models that can be utilized to enhance the learning experience for students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cremin, T.A.: The Transformation of the School. Knopf, New York (1976)
Johal, W.: Research trends in social robots for learning. Curr. Robot. Rep. 1, 75–83 (2020)
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3(21) (2018)
Tanaka, F., Matsuzoe, S.: Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 1(1), 78–95 (2012)
Velentza, A.M., Ioannidis, S., Georgakopoulou, N., Shidujaman, M., Fachantidis, N.: Educational robot European cross-cultural design. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12763, pp. 341–353. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78465-2_26
Petraki, E., Herath, D.: Teaching and learning robotics: a pedagogical perspective. In: Herath, D., St-Onge, D. (eds.) Foundations of Robotics, pp. 43–62. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1983-1_2
Engelmann, S., Carnine, D.: Theory of Instruction: Principles and Applications. Irvington Publishers (1982)
Baxter, P., Kennedy, J., Ashurst, E., Belpaeme, T.: The effect of repeating tasks on performance levels in mediated child-robot interactions. In: Workshop on Robots for Learning at RoMAN 2016 (2016)
Barab, S.A., Squire, K.: Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 1–14 (2004)
Ali, S., Devasia, N.E., Breazeal, C.: Escape! bot: social robots as creative problem-solving partners. In Creativity and Cognition, pp. 275–283, June 2022
Bravo, F.A., Hurtado, J.A., González, E.: Using robots with storytelling and drama activities in science education (2021)
von Glasersfeld, E.: Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80(1), 121–140 (1989)
Keane, T., Chalmers, C., Boden, M., Williams, M.: Humanoid robots: learning a programming language to learn a traditional language. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 28(5), 533–546 (2019)
Keane, T., Chalmers, C., Williams, M., Boden, M.: The impact of humanoid robots on students' computational thinking. In: Australian Council for Computers in Education 2016 Conference: Refereed Proceedings, pp. 93–102. The Queensland Society for Information Technology in Education (QSITE) (2016)
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978). Harvard University Press
Bruner, J.S.: Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press (1966)
Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., Ghazisaedy, M.: Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. Int. J. Humanoid Rob. 11(03), 1450022 (2014)
Van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Van der Ven, S., Leseman, P.: Social robots for language learning: a review. Rev. Educ. Res. 89(2), 259–295 (2019)
American Psychological Association: APA Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. American Psychological Association (2006)
Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., Dong, J.J., Alqasimi, R.: A review of the applicability of robots in education. J. Technol. Educ. Learn. 1(2), 111–126 (2013)
Nasir, J., Bruno, B., Chetouani, M., Dillenbourg, P.: What if social robots look for productive engagement? Automated assessment of goal-centric engagement in learning applications. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–17 (2021)
Hashimoto, T., Verner, I.M., Kobayashi, H.: Human-like robot as teacher’s representative in a science lesson: an elementary school experiment. In: Kim, J.H., Matson, E., Myung, H., Xu, P. (eds.) Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 2012. AISC, vol 208, pp. 775–786. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37374-9_74
Guggemos, J., Seufert, S., Sonderegger, S., Burkhard, M.: Social robots in education: conceptual overview and case study of use. In: Ifenthaler, D., Isaías, P., Sampson, D.G. (eds.) Orchestration of Learning Environments in the Digital World. CELDA, pp. 173–195. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90944-4_10
Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, pp. 1–26. Keele University, Keele (2004)
Higgins, J.P., Green, S.: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (vol. 4). Wiley (2011)
Skinner, B.F.: Science and Human Behavior. Macmillan (1953)
Belpaeme, T., Tanaka, F.: Social robots as educators. OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021 Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots: Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots, 143 (2021)
Hattie, J.: Visible Learning: A synthesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge (2009)
Piaget, J.: Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Press (1970)
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.: Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. J. Learn. Sci. 1(1), 37–68 (1991)
Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., Chinn, C.A.: Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ. Psychol. 42(2), 99–107 (2007)
Kirschner, P.A., van Merriënboer, J.J.G.: Do learners really know best? Urban Legend Educ. Educat. Psychol. 48(3), 169–183 (2013)
Woo, H., LeTendre, G.K., Pham-Shouse, T., Xiong, Y.: The use of social robots in classrooms: a review of field-based studies. Educ. Res. Rev. 33, 100388 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leiba, M., Zulhian, T., Barak, I., Massad, Z. (2023). Designing Pedagogical Models for Human-Robot-Interactions – A Systematic Literature Review (SLR). In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34549-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34550-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)