Skip to main content

Using the Experience Sampling Method to Find the Pattern of Individual Quality of Life Perceptions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions (HCII 2023)

Abstract

In recent years, with the spread of smart cities, which comprehensively tackle the social experimentation and implementation of new technologies, countries worldwide are emphasizing the importance of development focusing on the well-being and quality of life (QoL) of citizens. One issue is that provider-driven projects in smart cities often need to push development forward in the minimum amount of time. If a project is carried out without fully determining whether the community and its citizens really need them, and if dialog with citizens is neglected, it is unlikely that useful services would be created. Therefore, to make human-centered improvements, we need a method to grasp whether the experiences of existing urban service and urban space help increase people’s QoL as well as the characteristics of people whose QoL increases versus those whose QoL does not. Therefore, this research aims to develop a tool named ActiveQoL-ESM for measuring the satisfaction of each daily activity based on the experience sampling method (ESM), a classical method for continuously collecting personal subjective data that significantly change dynamically during daily life. Moreover, we propose a method for evaluating urban service and spatial experiences and for analyzing how to improve these experiences from the data gathered through the ESM. Through an experiment using ActiveQoL-ESM, we find suitable evaluation methods for capturing individual QoL perceptions. We show it is possible that the methods could help clarify the meaning of the word “citizens,” not only from the attribute and personality data collected from the preliminary questionnaire but also from the contextual data gathered from Fitbit and smartphones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khayal, I.S., Farid, A.M.: Designing smart cities for citizen health & well-being. In: 2017 IEEE First Summer School on Smart Cities (S3C), pp. 120–125. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. The WHOQOL Group: The Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley, J., Kuyken, W. (eds.) Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_4

  3. Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  4. Hektner, J.M., Schmidt, J.A., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission: Urban Audit. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/urban-development/audit/. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  6. OECD Better Life Index. https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  7. European Commission: Quality of life in European cities. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/maps/quality_of_life. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  8. Gross Arakawa Happiness: GAH. https://rilac.or.jp/?page_id=307. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  9. Smart City Institute Japan Liveable Well-Being City Indicator. https://www.sci-japan.or.jp. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  10. The Australian Prevention Partnership Center: Liveability indicators. https://preventioncentre.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/03-Liveability-Indicators.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  11. Energy Lab: Area Quaria Indicator (in japanese), http://datastock.sub.jp/fiacs/area-qualia-index20221014-1.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., Prescott, S.: The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. J. Youth Adolesc. 6(3), 281–294 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrett, L.F., Barrett, D.J.: An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 19(2), 175–185 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. mEMA-Sense. https://apps.apple.com/jp/app/mema-sense/id1457623580. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  15. Better Evaluation: MetricWire. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/metricwire. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  16. Idealab: ESpecialy Me (in japanese). http://esm.life/howto. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  17. JESMA: Exkuma (in japanese). https://www.jesma.jp/exkuma. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  18. Qualtrics CoreEX. https://www.qualtrics.com/jp/core-xm/. Accessed 18 Mar 2023

  19. Hastie, T.J., Tibshirani, R.J., Friedman, J.H.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining Inference and Prediction. 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7

  20. Brooke, J.: SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, London, UK (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. From, W.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hussam, R., Rabbani, A., Reggiani, G., Rigol, N.: Rational habit formation: experimental evidence from handwashing in India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 14(1), 1–41 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

. The authors would like to thank all participants of the experiment using ActiveQoL-ESM in the long term. Especially, we would like to thank Deguchi and Warisawa Laboratory, and Hitachi and U-Tokyo Lab for cooperating with recruiting participants. This work was supported by the Habitat Innovation Project of H-UTokyo Lab, which is an industry-academia joint project between Hitachi, Ltd. And The University of Tokyo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyo Sasao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sasao, T., Tai, M., Suzuki, K., Warisawa, S., Deguchi, A. (2023). Using the Experience Sampling Method to Find the Pattern of Individual Quality of Life Perceptions. In: Streitz, N.A., Konomi, S. (eds) Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14036. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34668-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34668-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34667-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34668-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics