Abstract
In takeover process of conditionally automated driving, cognitive abilities, especially the executive function abilities, are found to play a significant role in driver’s performance. During the automated driving period, engaging in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) also significantly affects takeover performance; moreover, different attributes of NDRT such as different task modalities were found to have different influences on takeover performance. This study aims to explore the relationship between the influence of different modalities of NDRT and the corresponding executive function abilities in older drivers during conditionally automated driving. We designed computerized cognitive experiments to evaluate older drivers’ executive function abilities in different modalities, a simulated driving experiment to evaluate older drivers’ takeover performance, and then investigated their relationship by a correlation study. Twenty-four participants were recruited in this experiment. The results showed that instant lateral stability of takeover performance tends to be better when engaged in auditory n-back task than visual SuRT, and longer continuous lateral control was most unstable without any NDRT. The results from correlation analysis indicated that older drivers with worse executive function abilities in either auditory or visual modality would perform less stable takeover behavior when engaged in NDRTs requiring the same cognitive modality. Overall, these findings verified the correlation between takeover performance and executive function abilities, and provide understanding of the correlation between modalities of NDRTs and corresponding cognitive abilities of older drivers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Practice 77, 167–181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
Bellet, T., Paris, J.-C., Marin-Lamellet, C.: Difficulties experienced by older drivers during their regular driving and their expectations towards Advanced Driving Aid Systems and vehicle automation. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 52, 138–163 (2018). doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.014
SAE International: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles
Clark, H., Feng, J.: Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 106, 468–479 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.027
Körber, M., Gold, C., Lechner, D., Bengler, K.: The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 39, 19–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.03.002
Li, S., Blythe, P., Guo, W., Namdeo, A.: Investigating the effects of age and disengagement in driving on driver’s takeover control performance in highly automated vehicles. Transp. Plan. Technol. 42, 470–497 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2019.1609221
Stutts, J.C., Stewart, J.R., Martell, C.: Cognitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population. Accid. Anal. Prev. 30, 337–346 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00108-5
Anstey, K.J., Wood, J.: Chronological age and age-related cognitive deficits are associated with an increase in multiple types of driving errors in late life. Neuropsychology 25, 613–621 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023835
Daigneault, G., Joly, P., Frigon, J.-Y.: Executive functions in the evaluation of accident risk of older drivers. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 24, 221–238 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.2.221.993
Adrian, J., Postal, V., Moessinger, M., Rascle, N., Charles, A.: Personality traits and executive functions related to on-road driving performance among older drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 1652–1659 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.023
Mäntylä, T., Karlsson, M.J., Marklund, M.: Executive control functions in simulated driving. Appl. Neuropsychol. 16, 11–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280802644086
Adrian, J., Moessinger, M., Charles, A., Postal, V.: Exploring the contribution of executive functions to on-road driving performance during aging: a latent variable analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 127, 96–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.010
Guerrier, J.H., Manivannan, P., Nair, S.N.: The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search, and reaction time in the left turn performance of older female drivers. Appl. Ergon. 30, 109–119 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00017-9
Baldock, M.R.J., Mathias, J., McLean, J., Berndt, A.: Visual attention as a predictor of on-road driving performance of older drivers. Aust. J. Psychol. 59, 159–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701458035
Peng, Q., Wu, Y., Qie, N., Iwaki, S.: Age-related effects of executive function on takeover performance in automated driving. Sci Rep. 12, 5410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08522-4
Li, S., Blythe, P., Guo, W., Namdeo, A.: Investigation of older drivers’ requirements of the human-machine interaction in highly automated vehicles. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62, 546–563 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.009
Lee, S.C., Yoon, S.H., Ji, Y.G.: Effects of non-driving-related task attributes on takeover quality in automated vehicles. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 37, 211–219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1815361
Yoon, S.H., Lee, S.C., Ji, Y.G.: Modeling takeover time based on non-driving-related task attributes in highly automated driving. Appl. Ergon. 92, 103343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103343
Wu, Y., Kihara, K., Takeda, Y., Sato, T., Akamatsu, M., Kitazaki, S.: Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: a simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 124, 202–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.013
Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K.: How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. Ann. Meeting 58, 2063–2067 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581434
Wu, Y., Kihara, K., Takeda, Y., Sato, T., Akamatsu, M., Kitazaki, S.: Assessing the mental states of fallback-ready drivers in automated driving by electrooculography. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 4018–4023 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917029
ISO/T. 14198: Road vehicles — Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems — Calibration tasks for methods which assess driver demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems (2012)
Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A.: A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 597, pp. 525–537. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_52
Dumontheil, I., Klingberg, T.: Brain activity during a visuospatial working memory task predicts arithmetical performance 2 years later. Cereb. Cortex 22, 1078–1085 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr175
Woodman, G.F., Luck, S.J.: Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 269–274 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196569
Johannsdottir, K.R., Herdman, C.M.: The role of working memory in supporting drivers’ situation awareness for surrounding traffic. Hum Factors 52, 663–673 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810385427
Roche, F., Somieski, A., Brandenburg, S.: Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in highly automated driving: effects of the takeover-request design and the nondriving-related task modality. Hum Factors 61, 839–849 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818814963
Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum Factors. 37, 381–394 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779064555
Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: Is take-over time all that matters? the impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 230–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002
Salubre, K.J., Nathan-Roberts, D.: Takeover request design in automated driving: a systematic review. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meeting 65, 868–872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651296
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the JSPS Grant #17H01758.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Peng, Q., Wu, Y., Sato, T., Iwaki, S. (2023). The Relationship Between Older Drivers’ Cognitive Ability and Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14042. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34865-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34866-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)