Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Older Drivers’ Cognitive Ability and Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14042))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 792 Accesses

Abstract

In takeover process of conditionally automated driving, cognitive abilities, especially the executive function abilities, are found to play a significant role in driver’s performance. During the automated driving period, engaging in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) also significantly affects takeover performance; moreover, different attributes of NDRT such as different task modalities were found to have different influences on takeover performance. This study aims to explore the relationship between the influence of different modalities of NDRT and the corresponding executive function abilities in older drivers during conditionally automated driving. We designed computerized cognitive experiments to evaluate older drivers’ executive function abilities in different modalities, a simulated driving experiment to evaluate older drivers’ takeover performance, and then investigated their relationship by a correlation study. Twenty-four participants were recruited in this experiment. The results showed that instant lateral stability of takeover performance tends to be better when engaged in auditory n-back task than visual SuRT, and longer continuous lateral control was most unstable without any NDRT. The results from correlation analysis indicated that older drivers with worse executive function abilities in either auditory or visual modality would perform less stable takeover behavior when engaged in NDRTs requiring the same cognitive modality. Overall, these findings verified the correlation between takeover performance and executive function abilities, and provide understanding of the correlation between modalities of NDRTs and corresponding cognitive abilities of older drivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Practice 77, 167–181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellet, T., Paris, J.-C., Marin-Lamellet, C.: Difficulties experienced by older drivers during their regular driving and their expectations towards Advanced Driving Aid Systems and vehicle automation. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 52, 138–163 (2018). doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.014

  3. SAE International: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, H., Feng, J.: Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 106, 468–479 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Körber, M., Gold, C., Lechner, D., Bengler, K.: The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 39, 19–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, S., Blythe, P., Guo, W., Namdeo, A.: Investigating the effects of age and disengagement in driving on driver’s takeover control performance in highly automated vehicles. Transp. Plan. Technol. 42, 470–497 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2019.1609221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stutts, J.C., Stewart, J.R., Martell, C.: Cognitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population. Accid. Anal. Prev. 30, 337–346 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00108-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anstey, K.J., Wood, J.: Chronological age and age-related cognitive deficits are associated with an increase in multiple types of driving errors in late life. Neuropsychology 25, 613–621 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daigneault, G., Joly, P., Frigon, J.-Y.: Executive functions in the evaluation of accident risk of older drivers. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 24, 221–238 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.2.221.993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adrian, J., Postal, V., Moessinger, M., Rascle, N., Charles, A.: Personality traits and executive functions related to on-road driving performance among older drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 1652–1659 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mäntylä, T., Karlsson, M.J., Marklund, M.: Executive control functions in simulated driving. Appl. Neuropsychol. 16, 11–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280802644086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adrian, J., Moessinger, M., Charles, A., Postal, V.: Exploring the contribution of executive functions to on-road driving performance during aging: a latent variable analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 127, 96–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerrier, J.H., Manivannan, P., Nair, S.N.: The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search, and reaction time in the left turn performance of older female drivers. Appl. Ergon. 30, 109–119 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00017-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldock, M.R.J., Mathias, J., McLean, J., Berndt, A.: Visual attention as a predictor of on-road driving performance of older drivers. Aust. J. Psychol. 59, 159–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701458035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, Q., Wu, Y., Qie, N., Iwaki, S.: Age-related effects of executive function on takeover performance in automated driving. Sci Rep. 12, 5410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08522-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, S., Blythe, P., Guo, W., Namdeo, A.: Investigation of older drivers’ requirements of the human-machine interaction in highly automated vehicles. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62, 546–563 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, S.C., Yoon, S.H., Ji, Y.G.: Effects of non-driving-related task attributes on takeover quality in automated vehicles. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 37, 211–219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1815361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon, S.H., Lee, S.C., Ji, Y.G.: Modeling takeover time based on non-driving-related task attributes in highly automated driving. Appl. Ergon. 92, 103343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, Y., Kihara, K., Takeda, Y., Sato, T., Akamatsu, M., Kitazaki, S.: Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: a simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 124, 202–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K.: How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. Ann. Meeting 58, 2063–2067 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, Y., Kihara, K., Takeda, Y., Sato, T., Akamatsu, M., Kitazaki, S.: Assessing the mental states of fallback-ready drivers in automated driving by electrooculography. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 4018–4023 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917029

  22. ISO/T. 14198: Road vehicles — Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems — Calibration tasks for methods which assess driver demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A.: A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 597, pp. 525–537. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Dumontheil, I., Klingberg, T.: Brain activity during a visuospatial working memory task predicts arithmetical performance 2 years later. Cereb. Cortex 22, 1078–1085 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woodman, G.F., Luck, S.J.: Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 269–274 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johannsdottir, K.R., Herdman, C.M.: The role of working memory in supporting drivers’ situation awareness for surrounding traffic. Hum Factors 52, 663–673 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810385427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roche, F., Somieski, A., Brandenburg, S.: Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in highly automated driving: effects of the takeover-request design and the nondriving-related task modality. Hum Factors 61, 839–849 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818814963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum Factors. 37, 381–394 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779064555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: Is take-over time all that matters? the impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 230–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Salubre, K.J., Nathan-Roberts, D.: Takeover request design in automated driving: a systematic review. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meeting 65, 868–872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the JSPS Grant #17H01758.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunao Iwaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peng, Q., Wu, Y., Sato, T., Iwaki, S. (2023). The Relationship Between Older Drivers’ Cognitive Ability and Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14042. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34865-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34866-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics