Abstract
Due to an aging population, stressed caregivers within a stressed care sector as well as the wish of aging at home, there is an urgent need to provide solutions to cope with these challenges today and in the future. Finding technological, i.e., robotic, solutions is an interesting approach and is a highly frequented research topic. However, engineering social assistance robots (SARs) to a satisfying degree of usability and technology acceptance is challenging, because fulfilling user’s expectations – especially with older adults as key user group – means to implement naturally-feeling robotic behaviour which leads to emulate a semi-human-like task execution behaviour. Within our work, we addressed the scheduling of robotic activities based on aspects such as parallelisability for multi-task execution, user- and system-triggered commands, as well as task priorities to allow interruption or stopping of running activities or dismissing incoming commands. We assessed user’s expectations within a survey-based requirements analysis and derived a decision-making concept for scheduling incoming activities. We implemented the concept within a small app to evaluate the schema according to the acceptance of the resulting robotic behaviour. With this concept, we set a starting point to engineering well-accepted SARs from a behavioural perspective next to the finally implemented use cases and specific situations to use a SAR in the environment of older adults. This is crucial to move towards accepted technological solutions to the social challenges mentioned above that arise with an aging population.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World population ageing 2020 Highlights: living arrangements of older persons. United Nations, New York (2020)
Martinez-Martin, E., Escalona, F., Cazorla, M.: Socially assistive robots for older adults and people with autism: an overview. Electronics 9, 367 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020367
Thomas, G., Reddy, S., Oliel, S.: WHO | Global health workforce shortage to reach 12.9 million in coming decades. https://apps.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/health-workforce-shortage/en/index.html. Accessed 08 Feb 2023
Macis, D., Perilli, S., Gena, C.: Employing socially assistive robots in elderly care. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 130–138 (2022)
Yamazaki, K., et al.: Home-assistant robot for an aging society. Proc. IEEE 100, 2429–2441 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200563
Samaddar, S., Desideri, L., Encarnação, P., Gollasch, D., Petrie, H., Weber, G.: Robotic and virtual reality technologies for children with disabilities and older adults. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G., Mavrou, K., Manduchi, R., Covarrubias Rodriguez, M., Penáz, P. (eds.) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. LNCS, vol. 13342, pp. 203–210. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_24
Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.J.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, pp. 465–468 (2005)
Bradwell, H.L., Edwards, K.J., Winnington, R., Thill, S., Jones, R.B.: Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England. BMJ Open 9, e032468 (2019)
Bulgaro, A., Liberman-Pincu, E., Oron-Gilad, T.: Participatory design in socially assistive robots for older adults: bridging the gap between elicitation methods and the generation of design requirements. arXiv Prepr. arXiv:2206.10990 (2022)
Martín-García, A.V., Redolat, R., Pinazo-Hernandis, S.: Factors Influencing Intention to Technological Use in Older Adults. The TAM Model Aplication. Res Aging. 1640275211063797 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275211063797
Lindgren, H.: Younger and older adults’ perceptions on role, behavior, goal and recovery strategies for managing breakdown situations in human-robot dialogues. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3472307.3484679
Abdi, S., de Witte, L., Hawley, M.: Emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people: review of gray literature. JMIR Aging 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/17286
Huang, T., Huang, C.: Elderly’s acceptance of companion robots from the perspective of user factors. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 19(4), 935–948 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00692-9
Queirós, A., da Rocha, N.P.: Usability, Accessibility and Ambient Assisted Living. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91226-4
Gasteiger, N., et al.: Robot-delivered cognitive stimulation games for older adults. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. 10, 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3451882
Sauzéon, H., Edjolo, A., Amieva, H., Consel, C., Pérès, K.: An ambient assisted living platform for supporting aging in place of prefrail and frail older adults: rationale, HomeAssist plaform, quasiexperimental design, and baseline characteristics (2021)
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Lindefors, N.: Cognitive behavior therapy via the internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 12, 745–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.12.67
Vasudavan, H., Balakrishnan, S., Murugesan, R.K.: A study on activity recognition technology for elderly care. Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev. 13, 107–111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31782/ijcrr.2021.131225
Smith, R., Dragone, M.: A dialogue-based interface for active learning of activities of daily living. In: 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511130
Striegl, J., Gollasch, D., Loitsch, C., Weber, G.: Designing VUIs for social assistance robots for people with Dementia. Presented at the Mensch und Computer 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3473887
Getson, C., Nejat, G.: Socially assistive robots helping older adults through the pandemic and life after COVID-19. Robotics 10, 106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10030106
Song, Y., Yang, Y., Cheng, P.: The investigation of adoption of voice-user interface (VUI) in smart home systems among Chinese older adults. Sensors 22, 1614 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041614
Koebel, K., Lacayo, M., Murali, M., Tarnanas, I., Çöltekin, A.: Expert insights for designing conversational user interfaces as virtual assistants and companions for older adults with cognitive impairments. In: International Workshop on Chatbot Research and Design, pp. 23–38 (2021)
Murad, C., Munteanu, C., Cowan, B.R., Clark, L.: Revolution or evolution? Speech interaction and HCI design guidelines. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 18, 33–45 (2019)
Gollasch, D., Weber, G.: Age-related differences in preferences for using voice assistants. Presented at the Mensch und Computer 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3473889
Pollmann, K.: The modality card deck: co-creating multi-modal behavioral expressions for social robots with older adults. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 5, 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070033
Swoboda, D., Boasen, J., Léger, P.-M., Pourchon, R., Sénécal, S.: Comparing the effectiveness of speech and physiological features in explaining emotional responses during voice user interface interactions. Appl. Sci. 12, 1269 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031269
Zeng, D., et al.: SHECS: A Local Smart Hands-free Elderly Care Support System on Smart AR Glasses with AI Technology. arXiv:2110.13538v1 (2021)
Giri, G.S., Maddahi, Y., Zareinia, K.: An application-based review of haptics technology. Robotics 10, 29 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010029
Bardaro, G., Antonini, A., Motta, E.: Robots for elderly care in the home: a landscape analysis and co-design toolkit. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00816-3
Bradwell, H., Winnington, R., Thill, S., Jones, R.B.: Prioritising design features for companion robots aimed at older adults: stakeholder survey ranking results. In: Li, H., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 13086, pp. 774–779. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_70
Müller, S.: Realisierung nutzeradaptiven Interaktionsverhaltens für mobile Assistenzroboter (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gollasch, D., Weber, G. (2023). What to Do Next? An Activity Scheduling Schema for Social Assistance Robots for Older Adults. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14043. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34917-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34917-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34916-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34917-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)