Abstract
The tests performed at clinical pathology laboratories play an important role in medical decision-making. This paper describes the application of a risk assessment framework to the clinical pathology laboratory of a hospital in the north of Portugal. The study involved a scoping literature review, focus groups and Bayesian Networks. Noisy-OR Canonical model was used to determine the conditional probabilities of Bayesian Networks. The approach can easily be adapted for other clinical laboratories. The study presents a new, simple and easy to understand alternative to the traditional Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) for risk management that: 1) facilitates the global visualization of the interdependencies between risk events; 2) obtains the likelihoods of the risks; and 3) allows simulations of risk mitigation strategies. The framework and its outcomes were well accepted by clinical pathology laboratory professionals since they considered it suitable to contextualize the risk network structure to the specific reality of the laboratory and the resulting model was useful to raise awareness about the latent risks at the laboratory. Moreover, some risks not referred in the literature were identified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayot, M.L., Brannan, G.D., Naidoo, P.: Clinical laboratory. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing (2022)
Njoroge, S.W., Nichols, J.H.: Risk management in the clinical laboratory. Ann. Lab. Med. 34(4), 274–278 (2014)
ISO/IEC, Safety aspects - Guidelines for their inclusion in standards. ISO/IEC Guide 51, International Organization for Standardization Geneva (1999)
Chang, J., Yoo, S.J., Kim, S.: Development and application of computerized risk registry and management tool based on FMEA and FRACAS for total testing process. Medicina (Kaunas) 57(5), 477 (2021)
Xia, Y., et al.: Risk assessment of the total testing process based on quality indicators with the Sigma metrics. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 58(8), 1223–1231 (2020)
Plebani, M., Sciacovelli, L., Aita, A.: Quality indicators for the total testing process. Clin. Lab. Med. 37(1), 187–205 (2017)
Duan, M., et al.: National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 57(2), 195–203 (2019)
Zeng, Y., et al.: Establishment of risk quality control charts based on risk management strategies. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 59(4), 288–295 (2022)
Janssens, P.M., van der Horst, A.: Improved prospective risk analysis for clinical laboratories compensated for the throughput in processes. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 56(11), 1878–1885 (2018)
Plebani, M., et al.: Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a preliminary consensus. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 52(7), 951–958 (2014)
Keckler, M.S., et al.: Development and implementation of evidence-based laboratory safety management tools for a public health laboratory. Saf. Sci. 117, 205–216 (2019)
Crispim, J., Fernandes, J., Rego, N.: Customized risk assessment in military shipbuilding. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197, 106809 (2020)
Lehoux, P., Poland, B., Daudelin, G.: Focus group research and “the patient’s view.” Soc. Sci. Med. 63(8), 2091–2104 (2006)
Alaeddini, A., Dogan, I.: Using Bayesian networks for root cause analysis in statistical process control. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(9), 11230–11243 (2011)
Zhang, L., et al.: Towards a fuzzy bayesian network based approach for safety risk analysis of tunnel-induced pipeline damage. Risk Anal. 36(2), 278–301 (2016)
Plebani, M.: Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 44(6), 750–759 (2006)
Tricco, A.C., et al.: PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169(7), 467–473 (2018)
Assarroudi, A., et al.: Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J. Res. Nurs. 23(1), 42–55 (2018)
Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)
Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
Cárdenas, I.C., et al.: Using prior risk-related knowledge to support risk management decisions: lessons learnt from a tunneling project. Risk Anal. 34(10), 1923–1943 (2014)
van Gerven, M.A.J., Lucas, P.J.F., van der Weide, T.P.: A generic qualitative characterization of independence of causal influence. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 48(1), 214–236 (2008)
Carraro, P., Plebani, M.: Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin. Chem. 53(7), 1338–1342 (2007)
James, H.N.: Risk management for point-of-care testing. Ejifcc 25(2), 154–161 (2014)
Jairaman, J., Sakiman, Z., Li, L.S.: Sunway medical laboratory quality control plans based on six sigma, risk management and uncertainty. Clin. Lab. Med. 37(1), 163–176 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Crispim, J., Martins, A., Rego, N. (2023). Risk Management in the Clinical Pathology Laboratory: A Bayesian Network Approach. In: Abraham, A., Pllana, S., Casalino, G., Ma, K., Bajaj, A. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 717. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35510-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35510-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35509-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35510-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)