Skip to main content

Risk Management in the Clinical Pathology Laboratory: A Bayesian Network Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2022)

Abstract

The tests performed at clinical pathology laboratories play an important role in medical decision-making. This paper describes the application of a risk assessment framework to the clinical pathology laboratory of a hospital in the north of Portugal. The study involved a scoping literature review, focus groups and Bayesian Networks. Noisy-OR Canonical model was used to determine the conditional probabilities of Bayesian Networks. The approach can easily be adapted for other clinical laboratories. The study presents a new, simple and easy to understand alternative to the traditional Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) for risk management that: 1) facilitates the global visualization of the interdependencies between risk events; 2) obtains the likelihoods of the risks; and 3) allows simulations of risk mitigation strategies. The framework and its outcomes were well accepted by clinical pathology laboratory professionals since they considered it suitable to contextualize the risk network structure to the specific reality of the laboratory and the resulting model was useful to raise awareness about the latent risks at the laboratory. Moreover, some risks not referred in the literature were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayot, M.L., Brannan, G.D., Naidoo, P.: Clinical laboratory. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Njoroge, S.W., Nichols, J.H.: Risk management in the clinical laboratory. Ann. Lab. Med. 34(4), 274–278 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISO/IEC, Safety aspects - Guidelines for their inclusion in standards. ISO/IEC Guide 51, International Organization for Standardization Geneva (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, J., Yoo, S.J., Kim, S.: Development and application of computerized risk registry and management tool based on FMEA and FRACAS for total testing process. Medicina (Kaunas) 57(5), 477 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia, Y., et al.: Risk assessment of the total testing process based on quality indicators with the Sigma metrics. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 58(8), 1223–1231 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Plebani, M., Sciacovelli, L., Aita, A.: Quality indicators for the total testing process. Clin. Lab. Med. 37(1), 187–205 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan, M., et al.: National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 57(2), 195–203 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng, Y., et al.: Establishment of risk quality control charts based on risk management strategies. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 59(4), 288–295 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janssens, P.M., van der Horst, A.: Improved prospective risk analysis for clinical laboratories compensated for the throughput in processes. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 56(11), 1878–1885 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Plebani, M., et al.: Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a preliminary consensus. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 52(7), 951–958 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keckler, M.S., et al.: Development and implementation of evidence-based laboratory safety management tools for a public health laboratory. Saf. Sci. 117, 205–216 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crispim, J., Fernandes, J., Rego, N.: Customized risk assessment in military shipbuilding. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197, 106809 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lehoux, P., Poland, B., Daudelin, G.: Focus group research and “the patient’s view.” Soc. Sci. Med. 63(8), 2091–2104 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alaeddini, A., Dogan, I.: Using Bayesian networks for root cause analysis in statistical process control. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(9), 11230–11243 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, L., et al.: Towards a fuzzy bayesian network based approach for safety risk analysis of tunnel-induced pipeline damage. Risk Anal. 36(2), 278–301 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Plebani, M.: Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 44(6), 750–759 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tricco, A.C., et al.: PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169(7), 467–473 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Assarroudi, A., et al.: Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J. Res. Nurs. 23(1), 42–55 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2

  21. Cárdenas, I.C., et al.: Using prior risk-related knowledge to support risk management decisions: lessons learnt from a tunneling project. Risk Anal. 34(10), 1923–1943 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Gerven, M.A.J., Lucas, P.J.F., van der Weide, T.P.: A generic qualitative characterization of independence of causal influence. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 48(1), 214–236 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Carraro, P., Plebani, M.: Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin. Chem. 53(7), 1338–1342 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. James, H.N.: Risk management for point-of-care testing. Ejifcc 25(2), 154–161 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jairaman, J., Sakiman, Z., Li, L.S.: Sunway medical laboratory quality control plans based on six sigma, risk management and uncertainty. Clin. Lab. Med. 37(1), 163–176 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Crispim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Crispim, J., Martins, A., Rego, N. (2023). Risk Management in the Clinical Pathology Laboratory: A Bayesian Network Approach. In: Abraham, A., Pllana, S., Casalino, G., Ma, K., Bajaj, A. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 717. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35510-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics