Skip to main content

Do People Tend to Select a Delayed Item?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14012))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1020 Accesses

Abstract

Dark patterns that lead users to unintentionally harmful behaviors are often used in e-commerce and social media, and consumer troubles are frequent. Dark patterns are also seen in choice situations, where some attempt to induce the user's behavior by making specific options prominent. Focusing on user interfaces that seem fair at first glance, but induce users to make a choice, we investigated the effect of delayed display of options for inducing users to make a choice. Specifically, we conducted a crowdsourcing experiment based on the hypothesis that when only one choice is delayed, the delayed choice is more likely to be selected. The experimental results showed no tendency for the delayed option to be chosen more often overall. However, we found that the effect of the delayed display of alternatives on choice varied from person to person. Specifically, it was suggested that a delayed display of the option in the upper left corner of the screen with a delay time of 0.1 s for early choosers and a delayed display of the choice in the center of the screen with a delay time of 0.2 s for late choosers might induce their choice behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brignull, H.: DECEPTIVE DESIGN, https://www.deceptive.design/. Accessed 2022/11/10

  2. Yokoyama, K., Nakamura, S., Yamanaka, S.: Do animation direction and position of progress bar affect selections? In: Ardito, C., et al. (eds.) INTERACT 2021. LNCS, vol. 12936, pp. 395–399. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray, M., C., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J., Toombs, L., A.: The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, no. 534, pp. 1–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mathur, A., Acar, G., Friedman, J.M., Lucherini, E., Mayer, J., Chetty, M., Narayanan, A.: Dark patterns at scale: Findings from a crawl of 11K shopping websites. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), pp. 1–32, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geronimo, D.L., Braz, L., Fregnan, E., Palomba, F., Bacchelli, A.: UI Dark Patterns and Where to Find Them: A Study on Mobile Applications and User Perception. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gunawan, J., Pradeep, A., Choffnes, D., Hartzog, W., Wilson C.: A comparative study of dark patterns across mobile and web modalities. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 1–29 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luguri, J., Strahilevitz, L.: Shining a light on dark patterns. Public Law Working Paper, no. 719 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, T.D., Nisbett, R.E.: The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluation and behavior. Soc. Psychol. 41(2), 118–131 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Valenzuela, A., Raghubir, P.: Position-based beliefs: the centerstage effect. J. Consum. Psychol. 19(2), 185–196 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosoya, M., Yamaura, H., Nakamura, S., Nakamura, M., Takamatsu, E., Kitaide, Y.: Does the pop-out affect the product selection of signage vending machine? In: 17th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2019), vol. 11747, pp. 24–32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maljkovic, V., Nakayama, K.: Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory Cogn. 22, 657–672 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Danziger, S., Levev, J., Avnaim-Pesso, L.: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(17), 6889–6892 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yahoo! Crowdsourcing. https://crowdsourcing.yahoo.co.jp/. Accessed 2022/11/18

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K12135.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichiro Kinoshita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kinoshita, Y., Sekiguchi, Y., Ueki, R., Yokoyama, K., Nakamura, S. (2023). Do People Tend to Select a Delayed Item?. In: Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35599-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35599-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35598-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35599-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics