Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the Impact of Anthropomorphic Framing and Product Value on User Acceptance of Delivery Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14048))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Delivery robots can contribute to efficient transportation and handover of goods in urban areas. To realize the full potential of this technology, users need to accept these novel systems. One possibility to increase acceptance is adapting the design of robots. The design of delivery robots, which are meant to function as tools but also interact closely with humans during transportation and delivery, presents both challenges and opportunities for increasing user acceptance. Specifically, anthropomorphic framing, or ascribing human-like characteristics to the robot, may influence acceptance. In addition, the type of goods being transported by the robot may also affect user acceptance. We used a video-based online experiment, to investigate how anthropomorphic framing and product value affect the individual and general acceptance and intention to use robots for transporting goods. In addition, we operationalized the perceived value of the robot’s service through the willingness to pay for this delivery service. The data of 189 participants were retrieved in our between-subjects online study. The study revealed no differences in general acceptance, intention to use, and willingness to pay for the service robot. However, anthropomorphic framing and the prize of the transported goods mattered for the individual acceptance of the delivery robots. In particular, anthropomorphically framed robots and robots transporting inexpensive goods were accepted significantly more. As the services of transporting inexpensive products were accepted more, the successful implementation and actual usage could lead to an extension of the acceptance of more expensive goods transportation. This result could be the basis for a gradual market entry strategy that starts with low-cost product transportation like food delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrar, M.M., Islam, R., Shanto, M.A.H.: An autonomous delivery robot to prevent the spread of coronavirus in product delivery system. In: 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), pp. 0461–0466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298108

  2. Darling, K., Nandy, P., Breazeal, C.: Empathic concern and the effect of stories in human-robot interaction. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 770–775. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A.: G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2), 175–191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feil-Seifer, D., Haring, K.S., Rossi, S., Wagner, A.R., Williams, T.: Where to next? The impact of Covid-19 on human-robot interaction research (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feuerberg, B.V., Bahner, J.E., Manzey, D.: Interindividuelle unterschiede im umgang mit automation-entwicklung eines fragebogens zur erfassung des complacency-potentials. In: In L. Urbas and C. Steffens (Hrsg.), Zustandserkennung und Systemgestaltung. 6. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme. (Reihe 22, Fortschrittberichte VDI, Nr. 22) (S. 199–202). Düsseldorf: VDI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Figliozzi, M., Jennings, D.: Autonomous delivery robots and their potential impacts on urban freight energy consumption and emissions. Transport. Res. Procedia 46, 21–28 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, K.: Tracking anthropomorphizing behavior in human-robot interaction. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 11(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442677

  8. Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C.: Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the Roomba vacuum in the home. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 258–265 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Proceedings. ROMAN 2003, pp. 55–60. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang, J., Choe, J.Y.J.: Exploring perceived risk in building successful drone food delivery services. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jung, S., Kim, H.: Analysis of amazon prime air UAV delivery service. J. Knowl. Inf. Technol. Syst. 12(2), 253–266 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, M.J., Kohn, S., Shaw, T.: Does long-term exposure to robots affect mind perception? An exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 64, pp. 1820–1824. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kopp, T., Baumgartner, M., Kinkel, S.: How linguistic framing affects factory workers’ initial trust in collaborative robots: the interplay between anthropomorphism and technological replacement. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 158, 102730 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, D., Rau, P.L., Li, Y.: A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(2), 175–186 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, H., Chi, O.H., Gursoy, D.: Antecedents of customers’ acceptance of artificially intelligent robotic device use in hospitality services. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 29(5), 530–549 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mims, C.: The scramble for delivery robots is on and startups can barely keep up. Wall Street J. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nijssen, S.R., Müller, B.C., Baaren, R.B.v., Paulus, M.: Saving the robot or the human? Robots who feel deserve moral care. Soc. Cogn. 37(1), 41–S2 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Onnasch, L., Hildebrandt, C.L.: Impact of anthropomorphic robot design on trust and attention in industrial human-robot interaction. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. (THRI) 11(1), 1–24 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Onnasch, L., Roesler, E.: Anthropomorphizing robots: the effect of framing in human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 63, pp. 1311–1315. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Onnasch, L., Roesler, E.: A taxonomy to structure and analyze human-robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(4), 833–849 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Richards, G.: Starship Campus Delivery Service with Robots (2019). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ftc0AVQEF6s

  22. Roesler, E., Manzey, D., Onnasch, L.: A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Sci. Robot. 6(58), eabj5425 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roesler, E., Manzey, D., Onnasch, L.: Embodiment matters in social HRI research: effectiveness of anthropomorphism on subjective and objective outcomes. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roesler, E., Naendrup-Poell, L., Manzey, D., Onnasch, L.: Why context matters: the influence of application domain on preferred degree of anthropomorphism and gender attribution in human-robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roesler, E., Onnasch, L., Majer, J.I.: The effect of anthropomorphism and failure comprehensibility on human-robot trust. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 64, pp. 107–111. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shanee, H.S., Dror, K., Tal, O.G., Yael, E.: The influence of following angle on performance metrics of a human-following robot. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 593–598. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sheridan, T.B.: Human-robot interaction: status and challenges. Hum. Factors 58(4), 525–532 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D.J., Shell, D.A., Mataric, M.J.: The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. In: ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 117–122. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., Epley, N.: Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5(3), 219–232 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Eileen Roesler & Johannes Pickl

  2. DTU Kopenhagen, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Felix W. Siebert

Authors
  1. Eileen Roesler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johannes Pickl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix W. Siebert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen Roesler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany

    Heidi Krömker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roesler, E., Pickl, J., Siebert, F.W. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Anthropomorphic Framing and Product Value on User Acceptance of Delivery Robots. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14048. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35678-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35678-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35677-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35678-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation