Skip to main content

Preliminary Usability Evaluation of UpSkill@Mgmt 4.0: A Tool to Promote Competency and Career Management in Industry 4.0

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Promoting personal development and learning is increasingly a concern for organizations in retaining employees in what is a volatile paradigm and so heavily impacted by technology. Thus, this concern must be managed in an easy and agile way, where digital tools can be important enablers of these characteristics. Allied with digital tools, specifically their innovative character, arises the need for validations to avoid errors in advanced stages of development. Usability studies are a very important technique for this type of evaluation, often used to understand whether platforms meet users’ needs, and to evaluate and if possible, improve user experiences. In this regard, this paper aims to preliminarily assess the usability of an innovative tool, capturing some adjustments suggested by users, at the same time as perceiving the users’ receptiveness to its use. The application showed that it was very well accepted by users and good contributions to improve the platform were suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Choi, T.M., Kumar, S., Yue, X., Chan, H.L.: Disruptive technologies and operations management in the industry 4.0 era and beyond. Prod. Oper. Manag. 31(1), 9–31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leesakul, N., Oostveen, A.M., Eimontaite, I., Wilson, M.L., Hyde, R.: Workplace 4.0: exploring the implications of technology adoption in digital manufacturing on a sustainable workforce. Sustainability 14(6), 3311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063311

  3. Tsaramirsis, G., et al.: A modern approach towards an industry 4.0 model: from driving technologies to management. J. Sens. 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5023011

  4. El Baz, J., Tiwari, S., Akenroye, T., Cherrafi, A., Derrouiche, R.: A framework of sustainability drivers and externalities for industry 4.0 technologies using the best-worst method. J. Clean. Prod. 344, 130909 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastos, T., Salvadorinho, J., Vitória, A., Teixeira, L.: Competence management in industry 4.0: an innovative concept to support a Skill@Mgmt 4.0 tool (2022). https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022orlando/151.pdf

  6. Ciccarelli, M., Papetti, A., Germani, M., Leone, A., Rescio, G.: Human work sustainability tool. J. Manuf. Syst. 62, 76–86 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastos, T., Salvadorinho, J., Teixeira, L.: UpSkill@Mgmt 4.0 - a digital tool for competence management: conceptual model and a prototype. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. (2022). https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2022-4-315

  8. Salvadorinho, J., Vitória, A., Ferreira, C., Teixeira, L.: Designing an engagement’s technological tool: user needs and motivations in a humanized way. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds.) HCII 2022. LNCS, vol. 13320, pp. 266–279. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06018-2_19

  9. Altin Gumussoy, C., Pekpazar, A., Esengun, M., Bayraktaroglu, A.E., Ince, G.: Usability evaluation of tv interfaces: subjective evaluation vs. objective evaluation. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 38(7), 661–679 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1960093

  10. Guerino, G.C., et al.: User experience practices in software startups: a systematic mapping study. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9701739

  11. Quiñones, D., Rusu, C., Rusu, V.: A methodology to develop usability/user experience heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 59, 109–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kilis, B.M.H., et al.: Usability evaluation of the android operating system using use questionnaire. Int. J. 1(2), 16–23 (2022). http://ijite.jredu.id/index.php/ijite/article/view/34. https://ijite.jredu.id/index.php/ijite/article/download/34/20

  13. CossyLeon-Pereza, R., Gallardo-Vazqueza, B., Soaresb, M.: Usability test for a bank service website. In: Advances in Ergonomics In Design, Usability & Special Populations: Part II, p. 394 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alhadreti, O.: A comparison of synchronous and asynchronous remote usability testing methods. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 38(3), 289–297 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1938391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, Z., Yuan, S., Ma, J., Wang, Q.: The evolution of production scheduling from industry 3.0 through industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1–21 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ing, T.S., Lee, T.C., Chan, S.W., Alipal, J., Hamid, N.A.: An overview of the rising challenges in implementing industry 4.0. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 8(6), 1181–1188 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, V., Vrat, P., Shankar, R.: Factors influencing the implementation of industry 4.0 for sustainability in manufacturing. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 23, 453–478 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00312-1

  18. Brozzi, R., Forti, D., Rauch, E., Matt, D.T.: The advantages of industry 4.0 applications for sustainability: results from a sample of manufacturing companies. Sustainability 12(9), 3647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093647

  19. Molino, M., Cortese, C.G., Ghislieri, C.: The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: from personal resources to information and training. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(7), 2438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438

  20. Cimini, C., Lagorio, A., Pirola, F., Pinto, R.: Exploring human factors in logistics 4.0: empirical evidence from a case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(13), 2183–2188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kadir, B.A., Broberg, O., da Conceicao, C.S.: Current research and future perspectives on human factors and ergonomics in industry 4.0. Comput. Ind. Eng. 137, 106004 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kadir, B.A., Broberg, O.: Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0. Appl. Ergon. 92, 103334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ligarski, M.J., Rożałowska, B., Kalinowski, K.: A study of the human factor in industry 4.0 based on the automotive industry. Energies 14(20), 6833 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206833

  24. Koleva, N.: Conceptual framework to study the role of human factor in a digital manufacturing environment. Industry 4.0 4(2), 82–84 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Urrutia Pereira, G., de Lara Machado, W., Ziebell de Oliveira, M.: Organizational learning culture in industry 4.0: relationships with work engagement and turnover intention. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int., 1–21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2021.1976020

  26. Lartey, F.M.: Impact of career planning, employee autonomy, and manager recognition on employee engagement. J. Hum. Resour. Sustain. Stud. 09(02), 135–158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2021.92010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khairat, M.I.S.B., Priyadi, Y., Adrian, M.: Usability measurement in user interface design using heuristic evaluation severity rating (case study: mobile TA application based on MVVM). In: 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference, CCWC 2022, pp. 974–979 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC54503.2022.9720876

  28. Kushendriawan, M.A., Santoso, H.B., Putra, P.O.H., Schrepp, M.: Evaluating user experience of a mobile health application ‘Halodoc’ using user experience questionnaire and usability testing. J. Sist. Inf. 17(1), 58–71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v17i1.1063

  29. Ahmad, N.A.N., Hussaini, M.: A Usability testing of a higher education mobile application among postgraduate and undergraduate students. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 15(9), 88–102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i09.19943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fox, S., et al.: Co-design of a smartphone app for people living with dementia by applying agile, iterative co-design principles: development and usability study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 10(1), e24483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2196/24483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin, A., et al.: A mobile phone intervention to improve obesity-related health behaviors of adolescents across Europe: iterative co-design and feasibility study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8(3), e14118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/14118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khanbhai, M., et al.: Enriching the value of patient experience feedback: web-based dashboard development using co-design and heuristic evaluation. JMIR Hum. Factors 9(1), e27887 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2196/27887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The present study was developed in the scope of the Project Augmented Humanity [POCI-01-0247-FEDER-046103 e LISBOA-01-0247-FEDER-046103], financed by Portugal 2020, under the Competitiveness and Internationalization Operational Program, the Lisbon Regional Operational Program, and by the European Regional Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiago Bastos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bastos, T., Salvadorinho, J., Teixeira, L. (2023). Preliminary Usability Evaluation of UpSkill@Mgmt 4.0: A Tool to Promote Competency and Career Management in Industry 4.0. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14032. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35702-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35702-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35701-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35702-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics