Skip to main content

The Impact of Technology Affordance of Short Videos on Users’ Health Information Acceptance: A Study Based on Chinese Short Video Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14034))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 700 Accesses

Abstract

Health communication, as an independent field under communication science, has now gained a huge attention from the society, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019. On the one hand, human society attaches more and more importance to health, and health information plays an important role in improving people’s wellness. On the other hand, with the development of media technology, the channels for health information communication have been constantly broadened. Short videos, as one of the major forms of new media, have been used to disseminate health information. Then, whether the media technology of short videos has an impact on users’ experience became the concern of this study. More specifically, this study investigated the correlation between the technological affordances of short videos and the acceptance of health information by Chinese users.

This study adopted a quantitative approach. Through data analysis and structural equation modeling, this study found a positively correlation between technology affordances of short videos and users’ experience of health information acceptance. Specifically, the association, visibility, and editability of short videos’ technology affordances positively influence users’ perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of health information, and further positively affect users’ continuous watching intention of health short videos. Based on these findings, this study suggested more targeted recommendations from a practical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parvis, L.: How to benefit from health communication.(Learning from Experience). J. Environmen. Health 65(1), 41–43 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, Y.: A retrospective of research in health communication. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Edn.) 25(5), 99–106 (2011). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers, E.M.: Up-to-date report. J. Health Commun. 1(1), 15–24 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, D.: A review and foresight of health communication research. Soc. Sci. Abroad 5, 49–52 (2006). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belle-Brown, J.B., Stewart, M., Ryan, B.L.: Out-comes of provider / patient interaction. In: Thompson, T., Dorsey, A., Miller, K., Parrott, R. (eds.) Handbook of Health Communication. Lawrence Erl-baum Associates, Mahway (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Noar, S.M.: A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here? J. Health Commun. 11(1), 21–42 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kline, K.N.: A decade of research on health content in the media: the focus on health challenges and sociocultural context and attendant informational and ideological problems. J. Health Commun. 11(1), 43–59 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petts, J., Niemeyer, S.: Health risk communication and amplification: learning from the MMR vaccination controversy. Health Risk Soc. 6(1), 7–23 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson, T.L.: Seventy-five (count’em—75!) issues of health communication: an analysis of emerging themes. Health Commun. 20(2), 117–122 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suggs, L.S.: A 10-year retrospective of research in new technologies for health communication. J. Health Commun. 11(1), 61–74 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. China Internet Network Information Center: The 50th Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development. http://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202212/P020221209344717199824.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2023

  12. Meng, W.: The hot spots, novelties and trends of new media research in 2021. Contemp. Commun. 1, 10–14+50 (2022). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, F.D., Venkatesh, V.: A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 45(1), 19–45 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mathieson, K.: Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 173–191 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Christopher, R.P., John, S.H., Vandenbosch, M.: Research report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(2), 208–222 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, p. 127. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, p. 239. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hjarvard, S.: Ian Hutchby: conversation and technology. From the telephone to the internet. MedieKultur J. Media Commun. Res. 18(34), 116–118 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chemero, A.: An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 15(2), 181–195 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vyas, D., Chisalita, C.M., Van Der Veer, G.C.: Affordance in interaction. In: Proceedings of the 13th Eurpoean Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Trust and Control in Complex Socio-Technical Systems, pp. 92–99 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jing, Y., Shen, J.: Introduction and expansion of the concept of new media affordance. Contemp. Commun. 1, 92–95 (2019). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chang, J.: The Internet, technological affordance and the emotional public. Youth J. 25, 92 (2019). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Majchrzak, A.: Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5), 1224–1239 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Treem, J.W., Leonardi, P.M.: Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36(1), 143–189 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G.C., Azad, B.: The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19(1), 38–55 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun, Y., Wang, C., Jeyaraj, A.: Enterprise social media affordances as enablers of knowledge transfer and creative performance: an empirical study. Telematics Inform. 51, 101402 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ellison, N.B., Gibbs, J.L., Weber, M.S.: The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: the role of organizational affordances. Am. Behav. Sci. 59(1), 103–123 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Evans, S.K., Pearce, K.E., Vitak, J., Treem, J.W.: Explicating affordances: a conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 22(1), 35–52 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oostervink, N., Agterberg, M., Huysman, M.: Knowledge sharing on enterprise social media: practices to cope with institutional complexity. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 21(2), 156–176 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pee, L.G.: Affordances for sharing domain-specific and complex knowledge on enterprise social media. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 43, 25–37 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leonardi, P.M.: Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition. MIS Q. 39(4), 747–762 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Van Osch, W., Steinfield, C.W.: Strategic visibility in enterprise social media: implications for network formation and boundary spanning. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 35(2), 647–682 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Walther, J.B.: Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western J. Commun. (Includes Commun. Rep.) 57(4), 381–398 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rice, R.E.: Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. J. Commun. 37(4), 65–94 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rice, R.E., Evans, S.K., Pearce, K.E., Sivunen, A., Vitak, J., Treem, J.W.: Organizational media affordances: operationalization and associations with media use. J. Commun. 67(1), 106–130 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hair, J.F., Gabriel, M., Patel, V.: AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Braz. J. Market. 13(2), 169–183 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Harman, H.H.: Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Arpaci, I., Baloğlu, M.: The impact of cultural collectivism on knowledge sharing among information technology majoring undergraduates. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 65–71 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nikou, S.: Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: an empirical assessment. Telematics Inform. 45, 101283 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 8 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Saadé, R., Bahli, B.: The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 42(2), 317–327 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tsai, J.P., Ho, C.F.: Does design matter? Affordance perspective on smartphone usage. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 113(9), 1248–1269 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mao, C.M., Hovick, S.R.: Adding affordances and communication efficacy to the technology acceptance model to study the messaging features of online patient portals among young adults. Health Commun. 37(3), 307–315 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schrock, A.R.: Communicative affordances of mobile media: portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. Int. J. Commun. 18(9), 1229–1246 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, M., Zeng, F.: Research on APP design of short video learning for the elderly based on user acceptance. Packag. Eng. 43(4), 203–209 (2022). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kui, Q., Wang, L., Liu, Y.: Study on the factors of short video’s influence on users’ willingness to purchase books. China Publish. J. 6, 8–14 (2020). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Guo, H., Zhao, Y., Shi, H.: Research of the influence of short-form video display on customers’ purchase intention on the E-commerce platform. Inf. Stud. Theory Appl. 42(5), 141–147 (2019). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Suh, A., Wagner, C.: How gamification of an enterprise collaboration system increases knowledge contribution: an affordance approach. J. Knowl. Manag. 21(2), 416–431 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chen, Y., Pan, P.: Investigation on factors influencing perception of information usefulness of health short videos. J. Mod. Inf. 41(11), 43–56 (2021). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, D., Chen, Y., Wang, M.: Expectation and confirmation: a preliminary study on the factors influencing the continuous use of short video platforms - based on SEM and fsQCA. Mod. Commun. (J. Commun. Univ. China) 289(9), 133–140 (2020). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao, X.: Research on the factors influencing users’ willingness to participate in advertising on short video platforms. China Market 1111(12), 27–30 (2022). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sundar, S.S.: The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J. (eds.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, pp. 73–100. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This Study Was Supported by the High-Level Talent Research Project of Xiamen University of Technology (YSK22019R).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunjie Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wei, W., Chen, Y. (2023). The Impact of Technology Affordance of Short Videos on Users’ Health Information Acceptance: A Study Based on Chinese Short Video Users. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35705-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35705-3_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35704-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35705-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics