Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization Strategy of Guidance Methods of Online Education Information Transmission

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14033))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 550 Accesses

Abstract

The innovation of immersion tools and online platforms provides more possibilities for the development of online education. Information guidance is a key part of information translation for online education information providers and directly affects the information translation into the receiver, so a more profound discussion and design of guidance methods are needed to optimize the effectiveness of online education information transmission. This study expands the guidance methods by dividing them into traditional guidance and multidimensional guidance according to different interaction modes of online education. Forty subjects were screened by a basic information questionnaire and a two-factor intergroup experimental design with 2 guidance methods (traditional and multidimensional) × 2 digital media (smartphone and tablet) was conducted. Learners evaluated and provided feedback on the experimental material from cognitive and affective goals through questionnaires. The results of the questionnaire analysis showed that the effectiveness of online educational transfer Learners learn better when educators use multidimensional guidance; multidimensional guidance increases learner engagement, thus effectively improving the effectiveness of information transmission. Learners learn better when digital media with large screen sizes are used; educators always improve online learning satisfaction better when they use tablets as digital media when conducting instruction. This finding enriches the research on the influence of guidance methods and digital media on information delivery in synchronous online teaching, where the research on the innovation of guidance methods provides the basis for the innovation and application of interactive technologies in online education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hodges, C.B., Moore, S., Lockee, B.B., et al.: The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Picciano, A.G.: Theories and frameworks for online education: seeking an integrated model. Online Learn. 21(3) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qiyang, G., Peiyao, C., Yong, W., Runfeng, L.: The effect of teacher humor on learning engagement in online learning environments: a multilevel structural equation analysis. Psychol. Sci. 45(04), 879–887 (2022). https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20220415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer, R.E., Sobko, K., Mautone, P.D.: Social cues in multimedia learning: role of speaker’s voice. J. Educ. Psychol. 95(2), 419–425 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer, R.E.: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S.: Preparing for the digital university (2015). https://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf

  7. Verenikina, I., Jones, P.T., Delahunty, J.: The guide to fostering asynchronous online discussion in higher education (2017). http://www.fold.org.au/docs/TheGuide_Final.pdf

  8. Gourlay, L.: There is no ‘virtual learning’: the materiality of digital education. J. New Approach. Educ. Res. 9(2), 57 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, K.J., Sundar, S.S.: Can interface features affect aggression resulting from violent video game play? An examination of realistic controller and large screen size. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Newt. 16(5), 329–334 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthew, L., Theresa, D.: At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Computer-mediated Commun. 3(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Detenber, B.H., Reeves, B.: A bio-informational theory of emotion: motion and image size effects on viewers. J. Commun. 46(3), 66–84 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, M.: Looking over the horizon: new learning platforms, old technology debates. In: Mooney, B. (ed.) Education Matters: Shaping Ireland's Education Landscape, pp. 40–48. Educatio n Matters, Galway (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, M., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Junhong, I.: Five trends affecting online learning: a multi-focused perspective on possible future developments. China Dist. Educ. 569(06), 21–35+7677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2022.06.003

  14. Lasswell, H.D.: The structure and function of communication in society. In The Communication of Ideas; The Institute for Religious and Social Studies, New York (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qingguang, G.: Tutorial on Communication. People’s University of China Press, Beijing (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, M.G.: Three types of interaction. Am. J. Dist. Educ. 3(2), 1–7 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, T.: Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn. 4(2), 65 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer, R.E., Fiorella, L., Stull, A.: Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 68(3), 837–852 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M.W., Klatzky, R.: Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: a lesson in symmetry. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 28(2), 187–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, Y., Li, W., Liu, Y., Gu, D.: An eye-movement study on the effect of presentation of important and difficult points on learning effect in teaching videos. Telev. Technol. 42(03), 86–92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.16280/j.videoe.2018.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, L.: The effects of teacher gestures and gaze guidance on learners’ learning in instructional videos: the experience reversal effect. Huazhong Normal University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, D., Kim, D.J.: Effect of screen size on multimedia vocabulary learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(1), 62–70 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Joon, K.K.: Shape and size matter for smartwatches: effects of screen shape, screen size, and presentation mode in wearable communication. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2017(3), 124–140 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wibirama, S., Nugroho, H.A.: Towards understanding addiction factors of mobile devices: an eye tracking study on effect of screen size. In: International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, pp. 2454–2457. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Neisser, U.: Cognitive psychology. (Book Reviews: Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology). Science, 198, 816–817 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dochy, F.J.R.C., Alexander, P.A.: Mapping prior knowledge: a framework for discussion among researchers. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 10(3), 225–242 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalyuga, S.: Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19(4), 509–539 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Homer, B.D., Plass, J.L., Blake, L.: The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Comput. Human Behav. 24(3), 786–797 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gagnewrited, R.: The Conditions of Learnig, 3rd edn. Holt Rinehart and Winston, Austin (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wei, H.C., Chou, C.: Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter? (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong, Y., Wu, Q.: A survey on online learning satisfaction of secondary school students in the context of “no classes, no school”: a survey analysis of 27, 199 secondary school students. China Vocat. Tech. Educ. 753(29), 40–48 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hu, X.: Preliminary development of a learning satisfaction scale for elementary school students. Hunan Normal University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reeve, J.: A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. Springer, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Philp, J., Duchesne, S.: Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Ann. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 36, 50–72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lepper, M.R., Malone, T.W.: Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sun, C.Y., Rueda, R.: Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(2), 191–204 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., Gannaway, D.: Learner engagement in MOOCs: scale development and validation. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 2020(5), 1–18 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, X.: Research on the influence of information presentation and self-efficacy on learning effectiveness. Liaoning Normal University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Design Art, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China

    Jimiao Dong, Jian Wang, Jing Tan, Ziye Wang & Jiahao Sun

Authors
  1. Jimiao Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ziye Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiahao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimiao Dong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aaron Marcus and Associates, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Aaron Marcus

  2. World Usability Day and Bubble Mountain Consulting, Newton Center, MA, USA

    Elizabeth Rosenzweig

  3. Southern University of Science and Technology – SUSTech, Shenzhen, China

    Marcelo M. Soares

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dong, J., Wang, J., Tan, J., Wang, Z., Sun, J. (2023). Optimization Strategy of Guidance Methods of Online Education Information Transmission. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14033. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35708-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35708-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35707-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35708-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation