Skip to main content

A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Identify the Intervention Priority Level of Covid-19 Patients in the Emergency Department: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14029))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 711 Accesses

Abstract

Several efforts have been made by hospital administrators to provide high-quality care for Covid-19-infected patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). Estimating the intervention priority level of Covid-19 patients is pivotal to underpin this process. However, diagnoses vary from one doctor to another considering various factors including experience, intuition, and education level. This problem is even more sharpened especially in absence of patient background and medical records. In addition, there is a large volume of infected persons requiring emergency care and a wide range of health and socio-personal particularities that need to be considered when deciding if these patients will be only treated at the ED, hospitalized, or returned home. Therefore, this study proposes a new integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach to identify the intervention priority level of Covid-19 infected patients. First, the Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (TNF-AHP) method was implemented to calculate the criteria and sub-criteria weights considering uncertainty and knowledge level. Second, the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Compromise Combined Solution (IF-CoCoSo) was applied to estimate the intervention priority level of Covid-19 patients and define actions to improve their health condition. The proposed approach was validated in a Mexican public hospital. As a result, an MCDM model comprising 5 criteria and 27 sub-criteria was designed to support this decision. Specifically, "Socio-personal characteristics" (overall weight = 0.195), "Hypogeusia" (overall weight = 0.0812), and "Chronic lung disease" (overall weight = 0.089) were found to be the most important decision elements in defining the intervention priority level of Covid-19 patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Peng, X., Yuan, H., Yang, Y.: Pythagorean fuzzy information measures and their applications. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32(10), 991–1029 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ortiz Barrios, M., Felizzola Jimenez, H., Nieto Isaza, S.: Comparative analysis between ANP and ANP-DEMATEL for six sigma project selection process in a healthcare provider (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pedrycz, W., Ekel, P., Parreiras, R.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: Models, methods and applications. In: Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: Models, Methods and Applications, pp. 1–338 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470974032

  4. Glaize, A., Duenas, A., Di Martinelly, C., Fagnot, I.: Healthcare decision-making applications using multicriteria decision analysis: a scoping review. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 26(1–2), 62–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ortíz-Barrios, M.A., Alfaro-Saíz, J.-J.: Methodological approaches to support process improvement in emergency departments: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(8), 2664 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, C., et al.: Early prediction of mortality risk among patients with severe COVID-19, using machine learning. Int. J. Epidemiol. 49(6), 1918–1929 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortíz-Barrios, M., Arias-Fonseca, S., Ishizaka, A., Barbati, M., Avendaño-Collante, B., Jiménez-Navarro, E.: Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the covid-19 pandemic: a case study. J. Bus. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Killerby, M.E., et al.: Characteristics associated with hospitalization among patients with covid-19 - metropolitan atlanta, georgia, march-april 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 69(25), 790–794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15585/MMWR.MM6925E1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, A., Das, A., Bera, U.K., Lee, G.M.: Prediction of transportation costs using trapezoidal neutrosophic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural networks. IEEE Access 9, 103497–103512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3098657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ortiz-Barrios, M., Silvera-Natera, E., Petrillo, A., Gul, M., Yucesan, M.: A multicriteria approach to integrating occupational safety & health performance and industry systems productivity in the context of aging workforce: a case study. Saf. Sci. 152, 105764 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Albahri, A.S., Hamid, R.A., Albahri, O.S., Zaidan, A.A.: Detection-based prioritisation: framework of multi-laboratory characteristics for asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers based on integrated Entropy–TOPSIS methods. Artif. Intell. Med. 111, 101983 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Özkan, B., Özceylan, E., Kabak, M., Dikmen, A.U.: Evaluation of criteria and COVID-19 patients for intensive care unit admission in the era of pandemic: a multi-criteria decision making approach. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 209, 106348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Darehmiraki, M.: A solution for the neutrosophic linear programming problem with a new ranking function. In: Optimization Theory Based on Neutrosophic and Plithogenic Sets, pp. 235–259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819670-0.00011-1

  14. Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Turskis, Z.: A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Manag. Decis. 57(9), 2501–2519 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz-Barrios, M., Gul, M., Yucesan, M., Alfaro-Sarmiento, I., Navarro-Jiménez, E., Jiménez-Delgado, G.: A fuzzy hybrid decision-making framework for increasing the hospital disaster preparedness: the colombian case. Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct. 72, 102831 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. García-Azorín, D., et al.: Frequency and phenotype of headache in covid-19: a study of 2194 patients. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94220-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akhavan, A.R., et al.: Risk stratification of covid-19 patients using ambulatory oxygen saturation in the emergency department. West. J. Emerg. Med. 21(6), 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5811/WESTJEM.2020.8.48701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jain, V., Yuan, J.-M.: Predictive symptoms and comorbidities for severe COVID-19 and intensive care unit admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Public Health 65(5), 533–546 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01390-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Galloway, J.B., et al.: A clinical risk score to identify patients with COVID-19 at high risk of critical care admission or death: an observational cohort study. J. Infect. 81(2), 282–288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng, C., Shao, W., Chen, X., Zhang, B., Wang, G., Zhang, W.: Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 114, 252–260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao, W., et al.: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in real-world: a literature review and meta-analysis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11(1), 2383–2392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2122582

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Alrasheedi, M., Mardani, A., Mishra, A.R., Streimikiene, D., Liao, H., Al-nefaie, A.H.: Evaluating the green growth indicators to achieve sustainable development: a novel extended interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-combined compromise solution approach. Sustain. Dev. 29(1), 120–142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando Perez-Aguilar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perez-Aguilar, A., Ortiz-Barrios, M., Pancardo, P., Orrante-Weber-Burque, F. (2023). A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Identify the Intervention Priority Level of Covid-19 Patients in the Emergency Department: A Case Study. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35747-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35748-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics