Skip to main content

News Articles on Social Media: Showing Balanced Content Adds More Credibility Than Trust Badges or User Ratings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Since digital media has become an important vehicle for news consumption, users are inevitably faced with a plethora of different news sources to choose from. Whether or not news is credible is often decided by recognition, intuition, and habits. However, it has become increasingly difficult for users to accurately assess the credibility of news articles. To understand how users evaluate credibility when seeing news on Facebook, we examine the interplay of the opinion of an article with additional credibility cues. To determine their utility, we use a novel conjoint-based research approach. In our experiment (n=178) we study four cues: Facebook reactions, a user rating, an institutional badge, and links to related content. In the last case, this content can either support or contradict the original news. We found that different cues have significantly different effects on credibility evaluation. We see that related content creates higher credibility than the other cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://osf.io/89mrw/.

References

  1. Urt. v. 24.11.2017 507 Ds 501 Js 15031/15 AG Giessen. Informationen über Schwangerschaftsabbrüche auf der ärztlichen Website als strafbare Werbungi.S.d. §219a StGB. Medizinrecht, vol. 37(1), pp. 77–79 (2019). ISSN 1433–8629

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almoqbel, M.Y., Wohn, D.Y., Hayes, R.A., Cha, M.: Understanding facebook news post comment reading and reacting behavior through political extremism and cultural orientation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 100, 118–126 (2019). ISSN 07475632

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anspach, N.M.: The new personal influence: How our facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Commun. 34(4), 590–606 (2017). ISSN 1058–4609, 1091–7675

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beierlein, C., Kemper, C.J., Kovaleva, A., Rammstedt, B.: Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen - Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS). GESIS Working Papers 18(2012) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bentley, F., Quehl, K., Wirfs-Brock, J., Bica, M.: Understanding online news behaviors. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery (2019). ISBN 9781450359702

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bode, L., Vraga, E.K.: In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. J. Commun. 65(4), 619–638 (2015). ISSN 00219916

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borah, P.: Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Commun. 30(3), 456–473 (2013). ISSN 10584609

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braun, K.: From ethical exceptionalism to ethical exceptions: The rule and exception model and the changing meaning of ethics in german bioregulation. Dev. World Bioeth. 17(3), 146–156 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brock, A., Dunlap, A.: Normalising corporate counterinsurgency: engineering consent, managing resistance and greening destruction around the Hambach coal mine and beyond. Political Geogr. 62, 33–47 (2018). ISSN 0962–6298

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bundesamt, S.: Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung - Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2017 -. Technical report, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M.: Believability of news. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds.) IEA 2018. AISC, vol. 822, pp. 469–477. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Chrzan, K., Orme, B.: An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Softw. Res. Paper Ser. 98382(360), 1–22 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coggio, T., Gustafson, T.: When the exit?: the difficult politics of german coal. German Politics Soc. 37(1), 47–65 (2019). ISSN 1558–5441, 1045–0300

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diehl, I., Weeks, B.E., de Zúñiga, H.G.: Political persuasion on social media: tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media Soc. 18(9), 1875–1895 (2016). ISSN 1461–4448

    Google Scholar 

  15. Douglas, S., Raine, R.B., Maruyama, M., Semaan, B., Robertson, S.P.: Community matters: how young adults use facebook to evaluate political candidates. Inform. Polity 20(2–3), 135–150 (2015). ISSN 18758754

    Google Scholar 

  16. Douglas, S., Maruyama, M., Semaan, B., Robertson. S.P.: Politics and young adults: The effects of facebook on candidate evaluation. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 196–204. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014). ISBN 9781450329019

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elejalde, E., Ferres, L., Herder, E.: On the nature of real and perceived bias in the mainstream media. PLoS ONE 13(3) (2018). ISSN 19326203

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fang, I.: A History of Mass Communication. Routledge, New York (1997). 9780080508160

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: Trusting expert- versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1626–1634 (2013). ISSN 0747–5632

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fletcher, R., Nielsen, R.S.: Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? a comparative analysis. New Media Soc. 20(7), 2450–2468 (2018). ISSN 1461–4448

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gao, M., Do, H.J., Fu, W.T.: Burst your bubble! an intelligent system for improving awareness of diverse social opinions. In: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI, pp. 371–383. Association for Computing Machinery (2018). ISBN 9781450349451

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garrett, R.K., Carnahan, D., Lynch, E.K.: A turn toward avoidance? selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behav. 35(1), 113–134 (2013). ISSN 01909320

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gedikli, F., Jannach, D., Ge, M.: How should i explain? a comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 72(4), 367–382 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., Logan, D.: Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. J. Stud. 13(5–6), 815–824 (2012). ISSN 1461670X

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaiser, J., Keller, T.R., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K.: Incidental news exposure on facebook as a social experience: The influence of recommender and media cues on news selection. Commun. Res., 009365021880352 (2018). ISSN 0093–6502

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kalogeropoulos, A., Suiter, J., Udris, L., Eisenegger, M.: News media trust and news consumption: factors related to trust in news in 35 countries. Int. J. Commun. 13, 22 (2019). ISSN 1932–8036

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karlsson, M., Klein, T.J., Ziebarth, N.R.: Skewed, persistent and high before death: medical spending in germany: medical spending in Germany. Fiscal Studies 37(3–4), 527–559 (2016). ISSN 01435671

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, A., Moravec, P., Dennis, A.R.: Behind the stars: The effects of news source ratings on fake news in social media. SSRN Elect. J. (2018). ISSN 1556–5068

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, C., Yang, S.-U.: Like, comment, and share on facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relat. Rev. 43(2), 441–449 (2017). ISSN 0363–8111

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klein, J., von dem Knesebeck, O.: Social disparities in outpatient and inpatient care: An overview of current findings in Germany. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 59(2), 238–244 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Meng, J.J.: Looking the other way. Commun. Res. 36(3), 426–448 (2009). ISSN 0093–6502

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koroleva, K., Krasnova, H., Stimac, V., Kunze, D.: I like it because i(’m) like you - measuring user attitudes towards information on facebook. In: International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011, vol. 2, pp. 1223–1241 (2011). ISBN 9781618394729

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krolzik-Matthei, K.: Abtreibungen in der Debatte in Deutschland und Europa. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (20) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C.: Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German debate on the future of coal. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 40, 190–204 (2018). ISSN: 22146296

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liao, Q.V., Fu, W.T.: Beyond the filter bubble: Interactive effects of perceived threat and topic involvement on selective exposure to information. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 2359–2368 (2013). ISBN 9781450318990

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liao, Q.V., Fu, W.T.: Expert voices in echo chambers: Effects of source expertise indicators on exposure to diverse opinions. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 2745–2754. Association for Computing Machinery (2014). ISBN 9781450324731

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lottridge, D., Bentley, F.R.: Let’s hate together: How people share news in messaging, social, and public networks. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, vol. 2018. Association for Computing Machinery (April 2018). ISBN 9781450356206

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maruyama, M., Robertson, S.P., Douglas, S., Semaan, B., Faucett, H.: Hybrid media consumption: How tweeting during atelevised political debate influences the vote decision. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, pp. 1422–1432. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014). ISBN 9781450325400

    Google Scholar 

  39. Melican, D.B., Dixon, T.L.: News on the net: credibility, selective exposure, and racial prejudice. Commun. Res. 35(2), 151–168 (2008). ISSN 00936502

    Google Scholar 

  40. Metzger, M.J., Hartsell, E.H., Flanagin, A.J.: Cognitive dissonance or credibility? Commun. Res., 009365021561313 (2015). ISSN 0093–6502

    Google Scholar 

  41. Min, S.J., Wohn, D.Y.: All the news that you don’t like: Cross-cutting exposure and political participation in the age of social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 83, 24–31 (2018). ISSN 07475632

    Google Scholar 

  42. Molyneux, L.: Mobile news consumption: A habit of snacking. Digital J. 6(5), 634–650 (2018). ISSN 2167082X

    Google Scholar 

  43. Munson, S.A., Resnick, P.: Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 1457–1466. ACM Press, New York (2010). ISBN 9781605589299

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nelimarkka, M., Laaksonen, S.M., Semaan, B.: Social media is polarized, social media is polarized: Towards a new design agenda for mitigating polarization. In: DIS 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 957–970. Association for Computing Machinery Inc. (2018). ISBN 9781450351980

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., DeVoss, C.L.: Who posted that story? processing layered sources in facebook news posts. J. Mass Commun. Q., 107769901985767 (2019). ISSN 1077–6990

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., Sundar, S.S.: Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav. 44, 240–249 (2015). ISSN 07475632

    Google Scholar 

  47. Orme, B.: Interpreting the results of conjoint analysis. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, pp. 77–88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G., Collins, E., Rand, D.G.: Assessing the effect of ’disputed’ warnings and source salience on perceptions of fake news accuracy. SSRN Electron. J. (2017). ISSN 1556–5068

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pieper, C.: Use your illusion: Televised discourse on journalistic ethics in the united states, 1992–1998. Soc. Semiotics 10(1), 61–79 (2000). ISSN 10350330

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C.S., Klein, M., Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A.: A short scale for assessing the big five dimensions of personality: 10 item big five inventory (bfi-10). Methods Data Anal. 7(2), 17 (2017). ISSN 2190–4936

    Google Scholar 

  51. Saha, K.: Social media as a passive sensor in longitudinal studies of human behavior and wellbeing. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery (2019). ISBN 9781450359719

    Google Scholar 

  52. Semaan, B., Robertson, S.P., Douglas, S., Maruyama, N.: Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: Towards depolarization. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, pp. 1409–1421. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014). ISBN 9781450325400

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stroud, N.J.: Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behav. 30(3), 341–366 (2008). ISSN 01909320

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sülflow, M., Schäfer, S., Winter, S.: Selective attention in the news feed: An eye-tracking study on the perception and selection of political news posts on facebook. New Media Soc. 21(1), 168–190 (2019). ISSN 1461–4448

    Google Scholar 

  55. Shyam Sundar, S., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Hastall, M.R.: News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 58(3), 366–378 (2007). ISSN 15322882

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sundmacher, L., Ozegowski, S.: Regional distribution of physicians: the role of comprehensive private health insurance in Germany. Europ. J. Health Econ. 17(4), 443–451 (2016). ISSN 1618–7598, 1618–7601

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: A survey of explanations in recommender systems. In: 2007 IEEE 23rd international conference on data engineering workshop, pp. 801–810. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R.M., Pingree, R.J.: News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking 20(5), 520–535 (2015). ISSN 10836101

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vaidya, T., Votipka, D., Mazurek, M.L., Sherr, M.: Does being verified make you more credible? In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2019, pp. 1–13. ACM Press, New York (2019). ISBN 9781450359702

    Google Scholar 

  60. Westerman, D., Spence, P.R., Van Der Heide, B.: Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 19(2), 171–183 (2014). ISSN 10836101

    Google Scholar 

  61. Winter, S., Krämer, N.C.: A question of credibility - Effects of source cues and recommendations on information selection on news sites and blogs. Communications 39(4), 435–456 (2014). ISSN 1613–4087

    Google Scholar 

  62. Winter, S., Krämer, N.C.: Who’s right: The author or the audience? effects of user comments and ratings on the perception of online science articles. Communications 41(3) (2016). ISSN 0341–2059

    Google Scholar 

  63. Winter, S., Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J.: Selective use of news cues: A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. J. Commun. 66(4), 669–693 (2016). ISSN 00219916

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wolf, C., Schnauber, A.: News consumption in the mobile era: The role of mobile devices and traditional journalism’s content within the user’s information repertoire. Digital J. 3(5), 759–776 (2015). ISSN 2167082X

    Google Scholar 

  65. Xu, Q.: Social recommendation, source credibility, and recency. J. Mass Commun. Q. 90(4), 757–775 (2013). ISSN 1077–6990

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yang, J.: Effects of popularity-based news recommendations “most-viewed” on users’ exposure to online news. Media Psychol. 19(2), 243–271 (2016). ISSN 1521–3269

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yu, R.P., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C.: Facebook use and its role in shaping access to social benefits among older adults. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 62(1), 71–90 (2018). ISSN 15506878

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank our participants for taking part in the study. This work was supported by the Digital Society research program funded by the Ministry of Culture and Science of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia under Grant 005-1709-0006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Calero Valdez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Halbach, P., Burbach, L., Ziefle, M., Calero Valdez, A. (2023). News Articles on Social Media: Showing Balanced Content Adds More Credibility Than Trust Badges or User Ratings. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35747-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35748-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics