Abstract
Agricultural work requires physical labor and often entails repetitive movements of the upper extremities, which can result in musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of utilizing an arm-support exoskeleton (ASE) on physical demands and task performance in simulated agricultural conditions. A group of 21 participants used a commercial arm-support exoskeleton to carry out brief simulated agricultural tasks at different height conditions, and the following outcomes were measured: muscle activity (%MVC) of the upper body muscles, task completion time, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). The results indicated that while the use of the ASE significantly reduced shoulder muscle activity at the shoulder and overhead work heights, participants spent more time performing the tasks and perceived higher exertion levels. In conclusion, ASE use has the potential as a new intervention for tasks that require arm elevation. Nevertheless, additional research is necessary to fully understand the benefits and limitations of this technology in the agricultural industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fathallah, F.A.: Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture. Appl. Ergon. 41, 738–743 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.003
Kirkhorn, S.R., Earle-Richardson, G., Banks, R.: Ergonomic risks and musculoskeletal disorders in production agriculture: recommendations for effective research to practice. J. Agromed. 15, 281–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2010.488618
Karttunen, J.P., Rautiainen, R.H., Leppälä, J.: Characteristics and costs of disability pensions in finnish agriculture based on 5-year insurance records. J. Agromed. 20, 282–291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2015.1042179
Rostamabadi, A., Jahangiri, M., Naderi Mansourabadi, B., Javid, M., Ghorbani, M., Banaee, S.: Prevalence of chronic diseases and occupational injuries and their influence on the health-related quality of life among farmers working in small-farm enterprises. J. Agromed. 24, 248–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2019.1592047
Da Costa, B.R., Vieira, E.R.: Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53, 285–323 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20750
Roquelaure, Y., et al.: Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Arthr. Care Res. Off. J. Am. Coll. Rheumatol. 55, 765–778 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22222
Gregorczyk, K.N., Hasselquist, L., Schiffman, J.M., Bensel, C.K., Obusek, J.P., Gu-tekunst, D.J.: Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage. Ergonomics 53, 1263–1275 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2010.512982
De Looze, M.P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Stadler, K.S., O’sullivan, L.W.: Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59, 671–681 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988
Romero, D., et al.: Towards an operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE46), Tianjin, China, pp. 29–31. (Year)
Kim, H.K., Seong, S., Park, J., Kim, J., Park, J., Park, W.: Subjective evaluation of the effect of exoskeleton robots for rehabilitation training. IEEE Access 9, 130554–130561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112263
Sakakibara, H., Miyao, M., Kondo, T.-A., Yamada, S.Y.: Overhead work and shoulder-neck pain in orchard farmers harvesting pears and apples. Ergonomics 38, 700–706 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925141
Kang, M.-Y., et al.: Musculoskeletal disorders and agricultural risk factors among Korean farmers. J. Agromed. 21, 353–363 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2016.1178612
Hyun, D.J., Bae, K., Kim, K., Nam, S., Lee, D.-h.: A light-weight passive upper arm assistive exoskeleton based on multi-linkage spring-energy dissipation mechanism for overhead tasks. Robot. Auton. Syst. 122, 103309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2019.103309
Sood, D., Nussbaum, M.A., Hager, K.: Fatigue during prolonged intermittent overhead work: reliability of measures and effects of working height. Ergonomics 50, 497–513 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130601133800
Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A.: Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation (1994)
Borg, G.A.: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. (1982). https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
Hermens, H.J., et al.: European recommendations for surface electromyography. Roessingh Res. Dev. 8, 13–54 (1999)
Perotto, A.O.: Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk. Charles C Thomas Publisher (2011)
De Luca, C.J.: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J. Appl. Biomech. 13, 135–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.13.2.135
Burden, A., Trew, M., Baltzopoulos, V.: Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 13, 519–532 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00082-8
Soderberg, G.L., Knutson, L.M.: A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Phys. Ther. 80, 485–498 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.5.485
Yin, P., Yang, L., Qu, S., Wang, C.: Effects of a passive upper extremity exoskeleton for overhead tasks. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 55, 102478 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102478
De Vries, A., De Looze, M.: The effect of arm support exoskeletons in realistic work activities: a review study. J. Ergon. 9, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35248/2165-7556.19.9.255
Rashedi, E., Kim, S., Nussbaum, M.A., Agnew, M.J.: Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work. Ergonomics 57, 1864–1874 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.952682
Huysamen, K., Bosch, T., de Looze, M., Stadler, K.S., Graf, E., O’Sullivan, L.W.: Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities. Appl. Ergon. 70, 148–155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.009
Kim, S., Nussbaum, M.A., Esfahani, M.I.M., Alemi, M.M., Alabdulkarim, S., Rashedi, E.: Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I–“expected” effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance. Appl. Ergon. 70, 315–322 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.025
McMillan, M., Trask, C., Dosman, J., Hagel, L., Pickett, W., Saskatchewan Farm Injury Cohort Study Team: Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among Saskatchewan farmers. J. Agromed. 20, 292–301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2015.1042611
Benos, L., Tsaopoulos, D., Bochtis, D.: A review on ergonomics in agriculture. Part I: manual operations. Appl. Sci. 10, 1905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10061905
Alabdulkarim, S., Nussbaum, M.A.: Influences of different exoskeleton designs and tool mass on physical demands and performance in a simulated overhead drilling task. Appl. Ergon. 74, 55–66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.004
Omoniyi, A., Trask, C., Milosavljevic, S., Thamsuwan, O.: Farmers’ perceptions of exoskeleton use on farms: finding the right tool for the work(er). Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 80, 103036 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103036
Kermavnar, T., de Vries, A.W., de Looze, M.P., O’Sullivan, L.W.: Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review. Ergonomics 64, 685–711 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1870162
Kim, S., Madinei, S., Alemi, M.M., Srinivasan, D., Nussbaum, M.A.: Assessing the potential for “undesired” effects of passive back-support exoskeleton use during a simulated manual assembly task: muscle activity, posture, balance, discomfort, and usability. Appl. Ergon. 89, 103194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103194
Howard, J., Murashov, V.V., Lowe, B.D., Lu, M.L.: Industrial exoskeletons: need for intervention effectiveness research. Am. J. Ind. Med. 63, 201–208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23080
Kim, H.K., Hussain, M., Park, J., Lee, J., Lee, J.W.: Analysis of active back-support exoskeleton during manual load-lifting tasks. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 41(5), 704–714 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-021-00644-w
Hussain, M., Park, J., Kim, N., Kim, H.K., Lee, J., Lee, J.: Effects of exoskeleton robot on human posture and lumbar pressure during manual lifting tasks. ICIC Express Lett. Part B Appl. 11, 439–445 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24507/icicelb.11.05.439
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01709902)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choi, B., Park, J. (2023). Examining Simulated Agricultural Tasks Using an Arm-Support Exoskeleton. In: Degen, H., Ntoa, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in HCI. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14050. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35890-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35891-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)