Skip to main content

A Method and Experimentation to Benchmark XR Technologies Enhancing Archeological Museum Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (HCII 2023)

Abstract

The use of eXtended Reality (XR) technologies, including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR), has become increasingly popular in museums to enhance the visitor experience. However, the impact of XR technologies on Learning Performance in the context of archeological museums needs to be better understood. This study aims to investigate the relationships between Usability, Presence and Learning Performance by developing XR experiences showcasing archeological artefacts and conducting user testing to evaluate their effectiveness. A laboratory test is conducted to compare a VR application with a mobile AR one, presenting the digital models of five archeological findings. Descriptive statistics are used to compare the two case studies, providing valuable insights into the impact of XR technologies on the visitor experience from a learning perspective. The study confirms that Usability has a more significant effect on learning than Presence and can help designers and museum managers better understand the factors contributing to a successful XR experience. The findings suggest that while Presence is an important factor in improving visitors’ experience, Usability should be the priority when designing XR experiences for museums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carrozzino, M., Bergamasco, M.: Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J. Cultural Heritage 11(4), 452–458 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noh, Z., Sunar, M.S., Pan, Z.: A review on augmented reality for virtual heritage system. In Learning by Playing. Game-based Education System Design and Development: 4th International Conference on E-Learning and Games, Edutainment 2009, Banff, Canada,9-11 August 2009. Proceedings 4, pp. 50-61. Springer Berlin, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03364-3_7

  3. Rua, H., Alvito, P.: Living the past: 3D models, virtual reality and game engines as tools for supporting archaeology and the reconstruction of cultural heritage-the case-study of the Roman villa of Casal de Freiria. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38(12), 3296–3308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He, Z., Wu, L., Li, X.R.: When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tourism Manag. 68, 127–139 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leopardi, A., Ceccacci, S., Mengoni, M.: Dynamic projection for the design of an adaptive museum guide. In: Rizzi, C., Andrisano, A.O., Leali, F., Gherardini, F., Pini, F., Vergnano, A. (eds.) ADM 2019. LNME, pp. 85–94. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3), 225–240 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burdea, G.C., Coiffet, P.: Virtual Reality Technology. John Wiley & Sons (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nilsson, N., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S.: Immersion revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Hum. Technol. 12(2), 108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowman, D.A., McMahan, R.P.: Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7), 36–43 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Generosi, A., Agostinelli, T., Mengoni, M., Ceccacci, S.: Augmented Reality for assembly operation training: does immersion affect the recall performance?. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE), pp. 58–63. IEEE (October 2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, H., Woo, D., Yu, S.: Virtual reality metaverse system supplementing remote education methods: Based on aircraft maintenance simulation. Appli. Sci. 12(5), 2667 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung, T., tom Dieck, M.C., Lee, H., Chung, N.: Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum. In: Inversini, A., Schegg, R. (eds.) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, pp. 621–635. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuemie, M.J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., Van Der Mast, C.A.: Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 4(2), 183–201 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pine, B. J., Gilmore, J.H.: Welcome to the experience economy, vol. 76(40), pp. 97–105. Harvard Business Review Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brooke, J., Bevan, N., Brigham, F., Harker, S., Youmans, D.: Usability statements and standardisation: Work in progress in ISO. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Third Interational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 357–361 (August 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schnack, A., Wright, M.J., Holdershaw, J.L.: Immersive virtual reality technology in a three-dimensional virtual simulated store: Investigating telepresence and usability. Food Res. Int. 117, 40–49 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Winter, C., Kern, F., Gall, D., Latoschik, M.E., Pauli, P., Käthner, I.: Immersive virtual reality during gait rehabilitation increases walking speed and motivation: a usability evaluation with healthy participants and patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilit. 18(1), 68 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rzeszewski, M., Orylski, M.: Usability of WebXR visualizations in urban planning. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform. 10(11), 721 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barbieri, L., Bruno, F., Muzzupappa, M.: Virtual museum system evaluation through user studies. J. Cultural Heritage 26, 101–108 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dow, S., Mehta, M., Harmon, E., MacIntyre, B., Mateas, M.: Presence and engagement in an interactive drama. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors In Computing Systems, pp. 1475–1484 (April 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schroeder, B.L., Bailey, S.K.T., Johnson, C.I., Gonzalez-Holland, E.: Presence and usability do not directly predict procedural recall in virtual reality training. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2017. CCIS, vol. 714, pp. 54–61. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58753-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Pallud, J.: Impact of interactive technologies on stimulating learning experiences in a museum. Inform. Manag. 54(4), 465–478 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluat. Indus. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Georgiou, Y., Kyza, E.A.: The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: an instrument for measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 98, 24–37 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Agostinelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Agostinelli, T., Generosi, A., Ceccacci, S., Pretaroli, R., Mengoni, M. (2023). A Method and Experimentation to Benchmark XR Technologies Enhancing Archeological Museum Experience. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35897-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35897-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35896-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35897-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics