Skip to main content

Research on Chinese Font Size of Automobile Central Control Interface Driving

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14049))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 413 Accesses

Abstract

This paper constructs a Chinese font size evaluation index of the vehicle central control interface combined with subjective and objective data, which makes up for the lack of ignoring objective data related to driving safety in previous studies, and improves the reliability of font size recommendations. Based on the experimental design method of single factor repeated measurement, the driving data, subjective scale data and task response data are collected. Through correlation analysis and mean value comparison, the reasonable recommended value of Chinese font size is obtained. The results show that there is a significant correlation between the visual subjective score, usability, workload, task response time and speed standard deviation and the font size. The visual subjective score shows that 5.5 mm–7.5 mm is the most suitable font size, and some subjects can also accept 9.5 mm. The usability is positively correlated with the font size within a certain range, and the workload, speed standard deviation and task response time are negatively correlated with the font size, but this negative correlation trend tends to flatten after the font size is greater than 7.5 mm. Therefore, 5.5 mm–7.5 mm is a more appropriate subtitle and text size, and 9.5 mm can be used for first-class titles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Huang, S.-M.: Effects of font size and font style of traditional Chinese characters on readability on smartphones. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 69, 66–72 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, A., Lee, P.: Effect of display factors on Chinese reading times, comprehension scores and preferences. Behav. Inf. Technol. 24, 81–91 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jin, X., Li, L., Yang, Y., Fu, M., Li, Y., You, F.: Touch key of in-vehicle display and control screen based on vehicle HMI evaluation. Package. Eng. 42, 151–158 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dobres, J., Wolfe, B., Chahine, N., Reimer, B.: The effects of visual crowding, text size, and positional uncertainty on text legibility at a glance. Appl. Ergon. 70, 240–246 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Née, M., Contrand, B., Orriols, L., Gil-Jardiné, C., Galéra, C., Lagarde, E.: Road safety and distraction, results from a responsibility case-control study among a sample of road users interviewed at the emergency room. Accid. Anal. Prev. 122, 19–24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, J., Gong, Z., Tan, J., Zhang, Q., Zuo, Y.: Assessing the driving distraction effect of vehicle HMI displays using data mining techniques. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 69, 235–250 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujikake, K., Hasegawa, S., Omori, M., Takada, H., Miyao, M.: Readability of character size for car navigation systems. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) Human Interface 2007. LNCS, vol. 4558, pp. 503–509. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73354-6_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Muslim, E., Moch, B.N., Lestari, R.A., Shabrina, G., Ramardhiani, R.: Ergonomic design of electric vehicle instrument panel: a study case on Universitas Indonesia’s national electric car. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, p. 012109. IOP Publishing (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wittmann, M., et al.: Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Appl. Ergon. 37, 187–199 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusumawati, R.E., Muslim, E., Nugroho, D.: Usability testing on touchscreen based electronic kiosk machine in convenience store. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, p. 040027. AIP Publishing LLC (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jakus, G., Dicke, C., Sodnik, J.: A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles. Appl. Ergon. 46, 184–192 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. You, F., Yang, Y.-F., Fu, M.-T., et al.: Design guidelines for the size and length of Chinese characters displayed in the intelligent vehicle’s central console interface. Information. 12(5), 213 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reid, G.B., Nygren, T.E.: The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. Adv. Psychol. 52, 185–218 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakano, K., Zheng, R., Ishiko, H., et al.: Gaze measurement to evaluate safety in using vehicle navigation systems. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO 24509:2019. Ergonomics—a method for estimating minimum legible font size for people at any age. Accessible design, p. 37 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly, M.J.: United States. Federal Highway Administration (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crundall, E., Large, D.R., Burnett, G.: A driving simulator study to explore the effects of text size on the visual demand of in-vehicle displays. Displays 43, 23–29 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Conradi, J.: Influence of letter size on word reading performance during walking. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, F (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Faulkner, L.: Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav. Res. Meth. Instr. Comput. 35(3), 379–383 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, X., Liu, S., Cai, B., et al.: Application of driving simulator for freeway design safety evaluation: a sample size study. In: Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanlong Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shao, J., Yang, Z., Li, Y., Li, X., Huang, Y., Deng, J. (2023). Research on Chinese Font Size of Automobile Central Control Interface Driving. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14049. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35908-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35908-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35907-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35908-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics