Skip to main content

Leveraging Nodal and Topological Information for Studying the Interaction Between Two Opposite Ego Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14026))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 602 Accesses

Abstract

The study of controversy in social media is not new, there are many previous studies aimed at identifying and characterizing controversial issues, mostly around political debates, but also for other topics. In this work, we aim to study the interaction between two ego networks around two influencers having opposite opinions on a given subject and its impact on opinion change and propagation within these two interconnected ego networks. We propose a method for detecting opinion modification in relation to several nodal and topological measures as the users centralities, the opinion of the community to witch belongs the users as well as textual information extracted from tweets. We firstly constructed a propagation network which is the union of 2-level opposite ego networks extracted from a set of collected tweets in relation to a given topic, where nodes are users and edges are tweets or replies. We then apply machine learning models to detect respectively: opinion change over time concerning users who are the authors of replies and opinion modification during the information propagation via an action of reply. The dataset contains nodal and topological information extracted from the propagation network.

We would like to warmly thank Charles-Philippe Frantz, Mohamed Sellami & Yvan Singuina students at CY Tech, speciality Data Science for helping us in the implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    H2O is an Open Source, Distributed, Fast & Scalable Machine Learning Platform.

References

  1. Arnaboldi, V., Conti, M., La Gala, M., Passarella, A., Pezzoni, F.: Ego network structure in online social networks and its impact on information diffusion. Comput. Commun. 76, 26–41 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Attal, J.-P., Malek, M., Zolghadri, M.: Overlapping community detection using core label propagation algorithm and belonging functions. Appl. Intell. 51(11), 8067–8087 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02250-4

  3. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Experiment 2008(10), 10008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ye, M., Anderson, B.D.O.: Recent advances in the modelling and analysis of opinion dynamics on influence networks (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Das, A., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. In: Carterette, B., Diaz, F., Castillo, C., Metzler, D. (eds.) Seventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2014, New York, NY, USA, 24–28 February 2014, pp. 403–412. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De, A., Bhattacharya, S., Ganguly, N.: Shaping opinion dynamics in social networks. In: André, E., Koenig, S., Dastani, M., Sukthankar, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, 10–15 July 2018, pp. 1336–1344. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Richland, SC, USA/ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Folly, K., Malek, M., Kotzinos, D.: Social networks analysis for opinion model extraction. In: Networks 2021: first combined meeting of the International Network for Social Network Analysis (Sunbelt XLI), and the Network Science Society (NetSci 2021), Indiana, United States, July 2021

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., Mathioudakis, M.: Quantifying controversy in social media. In: Bennett, P.N., Josifovski, V., Neville, J., Radlinski, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 22–25 February 2016, pp. 33–42. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gu, Q., Santos Jr., E., Santos, E.E.: Modeling opinion dynamics in a social network. In: 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2013, 17–20 November 2013, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 9–16. IEEE Computer Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, K.S.: A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J. Documentation 60(5), 493–502 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mathapati, S., Manjula, S.H., VenugopalK, R.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining from social media: a review. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammadinejad, A.: Consensus opinion model in online social networks based on the impact of influential users. (Modèle d’avis de consensus dans les réseaux sociaux en ligne basé sur l’impact des utilisateurs influents). Ph.D. thesis, Telecom & Management SudParis, Évry, France (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Monti, C., De Francisci Morales, G., Bonchi, F.: Learning opinion dynamics from social traces. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, August 2020

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adi Prasetya, H., Murata, T.: Modeling the co-evolving polarization of opinion and news propagation structure in social media. In: Aiello, L.M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L.M. (eds.) COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. SCI, vol. 813, pp. 314–326. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05414-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, B.: An approach to opinion mining in community graph using graph mining techniques. Int. J. Synth. Emot. 9(2), 94–110 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stavrianou, A., Velcin, J., Chauchat, J.-H.: A combination of opinion mining and social network techniques for discussion analysis. In: Poncelet, P., Roche, M. (eds.) Fouille de Données d’Opinions. RNTI, vol. E-17, pp. 25–44. Cépaduès-Éditions (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ureña, R., Kou, G., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks. Inf. Sci. 478, 461–475 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu, L., He, Y., Zhou, D.: Neural opinion dynamics model for the prediction of user-level stance dynamics. Inf. Process. Manag. 57(2), 102031 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Malek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Folly, K., Boughaba, Y., Malek, M. (2023). Leveraging Nodal and Topological Information for Studying the Interaction Between Two Opposite Ego Networks. In: Coman, A., Vasilache, S. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35927-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35927-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35926-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35927-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics