Abstract
In order to better understand smart home users’ preference for control methods, this study focused on user interaction with multiple smart home devices in daily home use scenarios. This study designed a within-subject experiment with control method as the independent variable and perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, intention to use, and satisfaction as dependent variables. The results showed that the centralized control method had a higher positive effect on users’ perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, intention to use, and attitude compared to the decentralized control method, but users were more satisfied with the decentralized control method. These findings provide implications for smart home design in terms of control methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Strese, H., Seidel, U., Knape, T., et al.: Smart home in deutschland: Untersuchung im rahmen der wissenschaftlichen begleitung zum programm next generation media (ngm) des bundesministeriums fĂĽr wirtschaft und technologie. Institut fĂĽr Innovation und Technik (iit), Berlin (2010)
Kim, K.J.: Interacting socially with the Internet of Things (IoT): effects of source attribution and specialization in human-IoT interaction. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 21(6), 420–435 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12177
Sundar, S.S.: The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative, Cambridge (2008)
Lee, B., Kwon, O., Lee, I., et al.: Companionship with smart home devices: the impact of social connectedness and interaction types on perceived social support and companionship in smart homes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 922–934 (2017)
Ischen, C., Araujo, T., van Noort, G., et al.: “I Am Here to Assist You Today”: the role of entity, interactivity and experiential perceptions in Chatbot persuasion. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 64(4), 615–639 (2020)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)
Coskun, A., Kaner, G., Bostan, İ: Is smart home a necessity or a fantasy for the mainstream user? A study on users’ expectations of smart household appliances. Int. J. Des. 12(1), 7–20 (2018)
Yu, N., Ouyang, Z., Wang, H., et al.: The effects of smart home interface touch button design features on performance among young and senior users. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(4), 2391 (2022)
Pliatsikas, P., Economides, A.A.: Factors influencing intention of Greek consumers to use smart home technology. Appl. Syst. Innov. 5(1), 26 (2022)
Hong, A., Nam, C., Kim, S.: What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services? Telecommun. Policy 44(2), 101867 (2020)
Robles, R.J., Kim, T.: Applications, systems and methods in smart home technology: A. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 15, 37–48 (2010)
Piyare, R., Lee, S.R.: Smart home-control and monitoring system using smart phone. ICCA, ASTL 24, 83–86 (2013)
Anthi, E., Williams, L., Słowińska, M., et al.: A supervised intrusion detection system for smart home IoT devices. IEEE Internet Things J. 6(5), 9042–9053 (2019)
Nicholls, L., Strengers, Y., Sadowski, J.: Social impacts and control in the smart home. Nat. Energy 5(3), 180–182 (2020)
Liu, Y., Xiao, L., Yao, G., et al.: Pricing-based demand response for a smart home with various types of household appliances considering customer satisfaction. IEEE Access 7, 86463–86472 (2019)
Gu, W., Bao, P., Hao, W., et al.: Empirical examination of intention to continue to use smart home services. Sustainability 11(19), 5213 (2019)
Rook, K.S.: Social support versus companionship: effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluations by others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52(6), 1132 (1987)
Mendelson, M.J., Aboud, F.E.: Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill friendship questionnaires. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 31(2), 130 (1999)
Lew, Z., Walther, J.B., Pang, A., et al.: Interactivity in online chat: conversational contingency and response latency in computer-mediated communication. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 23(4), 201–221 (2018)
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Philos. Rhetoric 10(2) (1977)
Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17(4), 460–469 (1980)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71901033).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shi, Y., Liu, N. (2023). Investigating Control Method of User Interaction with Multi-device in Smart Home. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35939-2_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35939-2_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35938-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35939-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)