Skip to main content

Designing Two-Stage Warning Systems: The Effect of Hazard Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Design (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14023))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 735 Accesses

Abstract

Warning system design is critical to road safety in the automated driving takeover process. Two-stage warning system had been proposed to be an optimal solution to achieve better takeover performance. However, the two-stage warning system design needs further verification and validation. The primary purpose of this study is to explore the effect of warning content on takeover performance during the automated driving takeover process with a two-stage warning system design. Trust evaluations for the warning systems were also examined to validate the user experience with the alarm design. A within-subject design was used in this study. The within-subject factor was the warning content related to hazard information with two levels: warning with content and warning without content. A driving simulation experiment was conducted, and 32 participants (16 males, 16 females) drove two sessions with the two kinds of warning system design. The results showed that providing warning content to the TOR stage in the two-stage warning system design could result in slower reaction time and shorter TTCwpll. With or without warning content design did not influence drivers’ trust evaluation for the two-stage warning system. This finding suggested that warning content should not be provided to the TOR stage when designing the two-stage warning system, which may result in traffic incidents due to an untimely takeover. This study helps design takeover warning systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boggs, A.M., Arvin, R., Khattak, A.J.: Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements. Accid. Anal. Prev. 136, 105406 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A.: Driving performance after self-regulated control transitions in highly automated vehicles. Hum. Factors 59(8), 1233–1248 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wan, J., Wu, C.: The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 34(11), 987–998 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arvin, R., Khattak, A.J., Kamrani, M., Rio-Torres, J.: Safety evaluation of connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic with conventional vehicles at intersections. J. Intell. Trans. Syst. 25(2), 170–187 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. SAE International: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (Technical report No. J3016) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gold, C., Happee, R., Bengler, K.: Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 116, 3–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gold, C., Berisha, I., Bengler, K.: Utilization of drivetime–performing non-driving related tasks while driving highly automated. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1666–1670.  SAGE Publications, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bazilinskyy, P., de Winter, J.C.: Analyzing crowdsourced ratings of speech-based take-over requests for automated driving. Appl. Ergon. 64, 56–64 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morales-Alvarez, W., Sipele, O., LĂ©beron, R., Tadjine, H.H., Olaverri-Monreal, C.: Automated driving: A literature review of the take over request in conditional automation. Electronics 9(12), 2087 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonald, A.D., et al.: Toward computational simulations of behavior during automated driving takeovers: a review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Hum. Factors 61(4), 642–688 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, B., de Winter, J., Varotto, S., Happee, R., Martens, M.: Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 64, 285–307 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weaver, B.W., DeLucia, P.R.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of takeover performance during conditionally automated driving. Human factors 0018720820976476 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ma, S., Zhang, W., Shi, J., Yang, Z.: The human factors of the take-over process in conditional automated driving based on cognitive mechanism. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 28(1), 150 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, H., Wu, C., Lyu, N., Li, J.: Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 171, 106647 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, X., Zhang, Y.: The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers’ situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 168, 106593 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen-Lazry, G., Katzman, N., Borowsky, A., Oron-Gilad, T.: Directional tactile alerts for take-over requests in highly-automated driving. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 65, 217–226 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gruden, T., TomaĹľiÄŤ, S., Sodnik, J., Jakus, G.: A user study of directional tactile and auditory user interfaces for take-over requests in conditionally automated vehicles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 174, 106766 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, Q., Guo, G., Zhang, Z., Zhang, B., Wu, Y.: Olfactory facilitation of takeover performance in highly automated driving. Hum. Factors 63(4), 553–564 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bazilinskyy, P., Petermeijer, S.M., Petrovych, V., Dodou, D., de Winter, J.C.: Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 56, 82–98 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Walch, M., Woide, M., Mühl, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Cooperative overtaking: Overcoming automated vehicles' obstructed sensor range via driver help. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 144–155. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, W., Kim, J., Kim, H.S., Lee, S.J., Yoon, D.: A study on the driver’s response performance according to modality of planned TOR in automated driving. In: 2019 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 1471–1473. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geitner, C., Biondi, F., Skrypchuk, L., Jennings, P., Birrell, S.: The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 65, 23–33 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoon, S.H., Kim, Y.W., Ji, Y.G.: The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 123, 150–158 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, S., et al.: Take over gradually in conditional automated driving: the effect of two-stage warning systems on situation awareness, driving stress, takeover performance, and acceptance. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 37(4), 352–362 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, W., et al.: Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality. Front. Psychol. 157 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wright, T.J., Agrawal, R., Samuel, S., Wang, Y., Zilberstein, S., Fisher, D.L.: Effects of alert cue specificity on situation awareness in transfer of control in level 3 automation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2663(1), 27–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu, Z., Happee, R., Cabrall, C.D., Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J.C.: Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 43, 183–198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu, Z., Zhang, B., Feldhütter, A., Happee, R., Martens, M., De Winter, J.C.: Beyond mere take-over requests: The effects of monitoring requests on driver attention, take-over performance, and acceptance. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 63, 22–37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, B., Lu, Z., Happee, R., de Winter, J., Martens, M.: Compliance with monitoring requests, biomechanical readiness, and take-over performance: Video analysis from a simulator study. In: 13th ITS European Congress, pp. ITS-1977 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winkler, S., Werneke, J., Vollrath, M.: Timing of early warning stages in a multi stage collision warning system: Drivers’ evaluation depending on situational influences. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 36, 57–68 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Epple, S., Roche, F., Brandenburg, S.: The sooner the better: Drivers’ reactions to two-step take-over requests in highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1883–1887. SSAGE Publications, age CA: Los Angeles, CA: (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., Huestegge, L.: Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 109, 18–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ji, W., Liu, R., Lee, S.: Do drivers prefer female voice for guidance? An interaction design about information type and speaker gender for autonomous driving car. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 208–224. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Du, N., Zhou, F., Tilbury, D., Robert, L.P., Yang, X.J.: Designing Alert Systems in Takeover Transitions: The Effects of Display Information and Modality. In: 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 173–180 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wan, J., Wu, C., Zhang, Y.: Effects of lead time of verbal collision warning messages on driving behavior in connected vehicle settings. J. Safety Res. 58, 89–98 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jian, J.Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4(1), 53–71 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronggang Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y., Ma, Q., Qu, J., Zhou, R. (2023). Designing Two-Stage Warning Systems: The Effect of Hazard Information. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35939-2_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35939-2_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35938-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35939-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics