Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Didactical Design Goes Rogue? Children’s Playful Explorations While Engaged in Scaffolded Coding Activities Supported by Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Games (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14047))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 862 Accesses

Abstract

Current society is characterized by rapid development and change, with technology being at the forefront in shaping the future. To accommodate this, it is crucial to equip the next generation with the critical skills and knowledge necessary to navigate in such a world. One way to achieve this is through the introduction and implementation of scaffolded coding activities supported by robots in primary education. In this paper we investigate how coding activities that include educational robots can be used in an educational setting with a class of Danish primary school children, aged 7–8 years old. The study draws from a socio-cultural approach to children’s learning and development, elaborating on the concepts of playfulness as a mediated action, the zone of proximal development, and scaffolding. The research questions posed in the study are: (1) How do primary school children adopt didactical instructions in a coding workshop supported by robots? (2) What kind of interactions unfold while children are engaged in coding activities supported by robots? The unit of analysis is children’s coding activities during an experimental coding-workshop supported by different robots carried out in a laboratory setting at a Danish university. The robots used in the workshop were Beebot/Bluebot, Dash and Ozobot. The results imply that scaffolding strategies such as task instructions and the design of the learning environment need to be closely connected and carefully considered to engage children in meaningful ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M.N., Jaccheri, L.: Exploring children’s learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 99, 415–427 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., Mondada, F.: Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving. Int. J. STEM Educ. 7, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, E., Sjöberg, J.: Playfulness and creativity as vital features when school children develop game-based designs. Des. Learn. 14(1), 137–150 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, E., Sjöberg, J.: Children’s programming of robots by designing Fairytales. In: Brooks, E., Dau, S., Selander, S. (eds.) Digital Learning and Collaborative Practices: Lessons from Inclusive and Empowering Participation with Emerging Technologies, pp. 158–174. Routledge, New York and London (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arfé, B., Vardanega, T., Montuori, C., Lavanga, M.: Coding in primary grades boosts children’s executive functions. Front. Psychol. 10, 2713 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bascou, N.A., Menekse, M.: Robotics in K-12 formal and informal learning environments: a review of literature. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malinverni, L., Valero, C., Schaper, M.M., de la Cruz, I.G.: Educational robotics as a boundary object: towards a research agenda. Int. J. Child Comput. Interact. 29, 100305 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barreto, F., Benitti, V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sjöberg, J., Brooks, E.: Understanding school children’s playful experiences through the use of educational robotics - the impact of open-ended designs. In: Fang, X. (ed.) HCI in Games, vol. 13334, pp. 456–468. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Major, L., Kyriacou, T., Brereton, O.P.: Systematic literature review: teaching novices programming using robots. In: 15th Annual Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011), Durham, pp. 21–30 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, D.P., Nourbakhsh, I.R., Siegwart, R.: Robots for education. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotic, pp. 1283–1301. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Xia, L., Zhong, B.: A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Comput. Educ. 127, 267–282 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Macrides, E., Miliou, O., Angeli, C.: Programming in early childhood education: a systematic review. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 32, 100396 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Popat, S., Starkey, L.: Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review. Comput. Educ. 128, 365–376 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Pizarro, C.: Coding in early years education: which factors influence the skills of sequencing and plotting a route, and to what extent? Int. J. Early Years Educ. 30(4), 969–985 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bers, M.U., González-González, C., Armas-Torres, M.B.: Coding as a playground: promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms. Comput. Educ. 138, 130–145 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moraiti, I., Fotoglou, A., Drigas, A.: Coding with block programming languages in educational robotics and mobiles, improve problem solving, creativity & critical thinking skills. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. (iJIM) 16(20), 59–78 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ioannou, A., Makridou, E.: Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: a summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Educ. Inf. Technol. 23(6), 2531–2544 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wertsch, J.V.: Mind as Action. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind and Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bruner, J.S.: The act of discovery. Harv. Educ. Rev. 31, 21–32 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brooks, E., Sjöberg, J.: A designerly approach as a foundation for school children’s computational thinking skills while developing digital games. In: IDC 2020: Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, pp. 87–95. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J., Tenenbaum, H.R.: Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J. Educ. Psychol. 103(1), 1–18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N.D., Spelke, E., Schulz, L.: The double-edged sword of pedagogy: instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition 120(3), 322–330 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Youell, B.: The importance of play and playfulness. Eur. J. Psychother. Couns. 10, 121–129 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Getzels, J.W., Jackson, P.W.: Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Wiley, Hoboken (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lucero, A., Arrasvuori, J.: The PLEX Cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness. Int. J. Arts Technol. 6(1), 22–43 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Proyer, R.T., Tandler, N., Brauer, K.: Playfulness and creativity: a selective review. In: Luria, S.R., Baer, J., Kaufman, J.C. (eds.) Creativity and Humor. A Volume in Explorations in Creativity Research, pp. 43–60. Academic Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rieber, R.W., Robinson, D.K.: The collective as a factor in the development of the abnormal child. In: Rieber, R.W., Robinson, D.K. (eds.) The Essential Vygotsky, pp. 201–219. Springer, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30600-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Holzman, L.: Without creating ZPDs there is no creativity. In: Connery, C.M., John-Steiner, V.P., Marjanovic-Shane, A. (eds.) Vygotsky and Creativity. A Cultural-Historical Approach to Play, Meaning Making, and the Arts, pp. 27–39. Peter Lang, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wood, D.J., Bruner, J., Ross, G.: The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 17(2), 89–100 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rogoff, B., Gardner, W.P.: Guidance in cognitive development: an examination of mother-child instruction. In: Rogoff, B., Lave, J. (eds.) Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context, pp. 95–116. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Newman, F., Holzman, L.: Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary Scientist. Routledge, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lobman, C.: Creating developmental moments: teaching and learning as creative activities. In: Connery, C.M., John-Steiner, V.P., Marjanovic-Shane, A. (eds.) Vygotsky and Creativity. A Cultural-Historical Approach to Play, Meaning Making, and the Arts, pp. 199–214. Peter Lang, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education, 7th edn. Routledge, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Knoblauch, H.: Videography: focused ethnography and video analysis. In: Knoblauch, H., Schnettler, B., Raab, J., Soeffner, H.-G. (eds.) Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, pp. 69–84. PeterLang, Frankfurt am Main (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Ministry of Higher Education and Research, Copenhagen, Denmark (2014). https://ufm.dk/en/publications/2014/files-2014-1/the-danish-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2021

  40. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fereday, J., Muir-Cochrane, E.: Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int. J. Qual. Methods 5(1), 80–92 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank all the participating children, teachers and workshop facilitators.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Halmstad University, Kristian IV:S Väg 3, 30118, Halmstad, Sweden

    Jeanette Sjoberg

  2. Aalborg University, Kroghstræde 3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark

    Eva Brooks

Authors
  1. Jeanette Sjoberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eva Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanette Sjoberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Xiaowen Fang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sjoberg, J., Brooks, E. (2023). Didactical Design Goes Rogue? Children’s Playful Explorations While Engaged in Scaffolded Coding Activities Supported by Robots. In: Fang, X. (eds) HCI in Games. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14047. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35978-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35979-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics