Skip to main content

Virtual Reality and the Interactive Design of Elevated Public Spaces: Cognitive Experience vs VR Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 Posters (HCII 2023)

Abstract

VR and visualization are visual aids, but can give much more than sight, such as a wider sensation of being in the 3D world. For the past ten years, researchers and organizations have been trying to find ways to get the public more involved in social project design and execution. Technologies such as Visual Simulation (VS) and Virtual Reality (VR) could make it possible to provide final stakeholders and consumers with closer access to the design and implementation processes of social projects. This paper analyzed two recent developments in London, Sky Garden and Crossrail Place. The study investigates how technologies such as VR can enhance the design experience of elevated urban spaces. The main aim of this study is to explore the difference and similarities between human interaction in the real cognitive experience and the virtual world. The method used in this study is walk-long interviews with the visitors of both gardens and a VR exploratory experiment, followed by semi-structured interviews with the participants. This methodology brings the participant as an active element of the project, able to explore the space and propose changes.

The paper discussed (i) the design quality of elevated social spaces such as accessibility, circulation, activities, design concerns and design features, (ii) the participant’s experience and behaviour during the study and (iii) the effectiveness of the design used tools. The results showed a positive impact on enhancing user involvement and allowed users to produce and test different design alternatives in real time. The research findings include a study of human activities in the physical and the virtual world, pedestrian modelling for the selected case studies, and an analysis of the potential need for new rules and regulations relating to the use of such spaces. The research also highlighted the limitations and potentials of using these new methods as a co-design approach for designing public and social spaces in the city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., Comber, R.: Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: app development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes. Environ. Plan. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 46(2), 286–302 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., Fava, N.: Towards smart sustainable cities: a review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 50, 101627 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, C., Zeng, W., Liu, L.: UrbanVR: an immersive analytics system for context-aware urban design. Comput. Graph. 99, 128–138 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolf, M., Söbke, H., Wehking, F.: Mixed reality media-enabled public participation in urban planning: a literature review. In: Jung, J., tom Dieck, M.C., Rauschnabel, P.A. (eds.) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality: Changing Realities in a Dynamic World, pp. 125–138. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Leeuwen, J.P., Hermans, K., Jylhä, A., Quanjer, A.J., Nijman, H.: Effectiveness of virtual reality in participatory urban planning: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, pp. 128–136 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Safikhani, S., Keller, S., Schweiger, G., Pirker, J.: Immersive virtual reality for extending the potential of building information modeling in architecture, engineering, and construction sector: systematic review. Int. J. Digit. Earth 15(1), 503–526 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, R., Gu, N., Lee, G., Khan, A.: A systematic review of architectural design collaboration in immersive virtual environments. Designs 6(5), 93 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Panya, D.S., Kim, T., Choo, S.: An interactive design change methodology using a BIM-based virtual reality and augmented reality. J. Build. Eng. 68, 106030 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Portman, M.E., Natapov, A., Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.: To go where no man has gone before: virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54, 376–384 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alizadehsalehi, S., Hadavi, A., Huang, J.C.: From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry. Autom. Constr. 116, 103254 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaker, R., Coloma, E.: Virtual reality-integrated workflow in BIM-enabled projects collaboration and design review: a case study. Visual. Eng. 6(1), 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-018-0065-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubio-Tamayo, J.L., Gertrudix Barrio, M., García García, F.: Immersive environments and virtual reality: systematic review and advances in communication, interaction and simulation. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 1(4), 21 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, S., Kim, J., Kim, B.: Immersive virtual reality-aided conjoint analysis of urban square preference by living environment. Sustainability 12(16), 6440 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meenar, M., Kitson, J.: Using multi-sensory and multi-dimensional immersive virtual reality in participatory planning. Urban Sci. 4(3), 34 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Y., Shakya, S., Odeleye, T.: Comparing the functionality between virtual reality and mixed reality for architecture and construction uses. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 13(1), 409–414 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sky-Garden. Sky Garden Visitor Rules & Regulations (2015). https://skygarden.london/terms-conditions/. Accessed 4 May 2020

  17. Bosetti, N., Brown, R., Belcher, E., Washington-Ihieme, M.: Public London: The Regulation, Management and Use of Public Spaces. Published by Centre for London, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schreier, M.: Varianten qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse: ein wegweiser im dickicht der Begrifflichkeiten. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 15, no. 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ehab, A., Burnett, G., Heath, T.: Enhancing public engagement in architectural design: a comparative analysis of advanced virtual reality approaches in building information modeling and gamification techniques. Buildings 13(5), 1262 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Ehab .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ehab, A., Heath, T., Burnett, G. (2023). Virtual Reality and the Interactive Design of Elevated Public Spaces: Cognitive Experience vs VR Experience. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1836. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36004-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36004-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36003-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36004-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics