Skip to main content

Torwards Trustworthy Machine Learning based systems: Evaluating breast cancer predictions interpretability using Human Centered Machine Learning and UX Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 Posters (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Although the use of Machine Learning techniques has been widely used in the literature in order to predict breast cancer. The focus of these works has been to improve the performance of classification algorithms for greater diagnostic accuracy. However, for these classification models to be used in a real environment, such as a cancer diagnosis assistance system in an oncology institution, in addition to high performance, models must also offer predictions that are easy to understand by radiologists who make the final diagnosis. In this work, we evaluate the level of trust from users in an AI-based system for breast cancer identification. This system uses computer vision and Deep Learning (DL) techniques to classify breast mammography and identify abnormalities associated with lumps or cancer tumors. The evaluation performed in this work focuses on the interpretability of the system and the explanations that are shown to users. To evaluate the interpretability of the model’s predictions, AI-based systems evaluation techniques from the Human-Centered Machine Learning (HCML) field were used, as well as classic usability and user experience (UX) techniques.

The results obtained show that users’ trust is related to the presentation of the explanations, that is, to how the system UI displays the predictions and shows the zones of the images used to calculate the predictions. In this sense, it was also possible to observe that the classic techniques of usability and UX have a relationship with the level of trust perceived by the users, which was measured with HCML evaluation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Usability heuristics for user interface design. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed 27 Feb 2023

  2. Hom, J.: http://www.sidar.org/recur/desdi/traduc/es/visitable/Herramientas.htm (1996). Accessed 27 Feb 2023

  3. Lovejoy, J.: Google. https://design.google/library/ux-ai/ (2018). Accessed 27 Feb 2023

  4. CHI 2016: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allugunti, V.R.: Breast cancer detection based on thermographic images using machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 4(1), 49–56 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlin, L.: Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. Am. J. Roentgenol. 189(3), 517–522 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bond, R.R., et al.: Human centered artificial intelligence: weaving UX into algorithmic decision making. In: RoCHI, pp. 2–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H., Gomez, C., Huang, C.M., Unberath, M.: Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review. npj Digital Medicine 5(1), 156 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Godoy, E., et al.: A named entity recognition framework using transformers to identify relevant clinical findings from mammographic radiological reports. In: 18th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis, vol. 12567, pp. 286–295. SPIE (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grau, X.F.: Principios básicos de usabilidad para ingenieros software. In: JISBD, pp. 39–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamed, G., Marey, M.A.E.-R., Amin, S.E.-S., Tolba, M.F.: Deep learning in breast cancer detection and classification. In: Hassanien, A.-E., Azar, A.T., Gaber, T., Oliva, D., Tolba, F.M. (eds.) AICV 2020. AISC, vol. 1153, pp. 322–333. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Humphrey, L.L., Helfand, M., Chan, B.K., Woolf, S.H.: Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the us preventive services task force. Ann. Internal Med. 137(5_Part_1), 347–360 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaluarachchi, T., Reis, A., Nanayakkara, S.: A review of recent deep learning approaches in human-centered machine learning. Sensors 21(7) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072514, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/7/2514

  14. Lindvall, M., Molin, J., Löwgren, J.: From machine learning to machine teaching: the importance of UX. Interactions 25(6), 52–57 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, C., et al.: Advances in breast cancer screening modalities and status of global screening programs. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 8(02), 112–123 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rautela, K., Kumar, D., Kumar, V.: A systematic review on breast cancer detection using deep learning techniques. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 29(7), 4599–4629 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). Int. J. Interact. Multimedia Artif. Intell. 4(6), 103–108 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shin, D.: User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system: perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 64(4), 541–565 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357

  19. Szynglarewicz, B., Matkowski, R., Kasprzak, P., Forgacz, J., Zolnierek, A., Halon, A., Kornafel, J.: Pain experienced by patients during minimal-invasive ultrasound-guided breast biopsy: vacuum-assisted vs core-needle procedure. Eur. J. Surgical Oncol. (EJSO) 37(5), 398–403 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798311000618

  20. Uchida, S., Fernández, G., T, M., Durán, M., Gálvez, T.: Characterization of lesions associated with microcalcifcations bi-rads 4a over a 11-year period of stereotactic breast biopsies. Revista Chilena de Radiologia 18, 30–35 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ueda, D., Yamamoto, A., Onoda, N., Takashima, T., Noda, S., Kashiwagi, S., Morisaki, T., Fukumoto, S., Shiba, M., Morimura, M., et al.: Development and validation of a deep learning model for detection of breast cancers in mammography from multi-institutional datasets. PLOS ONE 17(3), e0265751 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially founded by the Chilean ANID FONDEF 20i10332 Project and ANID-Millennium Science Initiative Program ICN2021-004. Also, J. Ugalde was partially funded by the Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, through grant No. 101.016/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Ugalde .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ugalde, J. et al. (2023). Torwards Trustworthy Machine Learning based systems: Evaluating breast cancer predictions interpretability using Human Centered Machine Learning and UX Techniques. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1836. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36004-6_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36004-6_73

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36003-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36004-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics